Fieldnotes and situational analysis in environmental education research: experiments in new materialism

References

• Banerjee, B., and M. Blaise. 2013. “There’s Something in the Air: Becoming-with Research Practices.” Cultural Studies, Critical Methodologies 13 (4):240–245. doi:10.1177/1532708613487867.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Half Way: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, S. 2015. “Human and Nonhuman Agency in Deleuze”. In Deleuze and the Non/Human, edited by Stark, H. and J. Roffe. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges-Rhoads, S. 2015. “Writing Paralysis in (Post) Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 21 (8):704–710. doi:10.1177/1077800414566690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges-Rhoads, S. 2017. “Philosophical Fieldnotes.” Qualitative Inquiry. doi:10.1177/1077800417733498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S. 2014. “Doing Without Data.” Qualitative Inquiry 20 (6):720–725. doi:10.1177/1077800414530254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, J. D. 2000. Ethnography. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Childers, S. M. 2013. “The Materiality of Fieldwork: An Ontology of Feminist Becoming.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26 (5):599–609. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.786845.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E. 2005. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E., C. Friese, and R. Washburn. 2015. Situational Analysis in Practice: Mapping Research with Grounded Theory. Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E., C. Friese, and R. Washburn. 2017. Situational Analysis: grounded Theory after the Interpretive Turn. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. A. G., and J. Mcphie. 2014. “Becoming Animate in Education: immanent Materiality and Outdoor Learning for Sustainability.” Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning 14 (3):198–216. doi:10.1080/14729679.2014.919866.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. A. G., and J. Mcphie. 2016. “From Places to Paths: Learning for Sustainability, Teacher Education and a Philosophy of Becoming.” Environmental Education Research 22 (7):1002–1024. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1057554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. 2002. Understanding Deleuze. Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Coole, D., and S. Frost. 2010. “Introducing the new materialisms”. In New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency and Politics, edited by Coole, D. and S. Frost. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1990. The Logic of Sense. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desmond, M. 2014. “Relational Ethnography.” Theory and Society 43 (5):547–579. doi:10.1007/s11186-014-9232-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1938. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: H. Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., R. I. Fretz, and L. L. Shaw. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., S. Doyle, M. K. Michael, and J. Scoles. 2015. “Matters of Learning and Education: Sociomaterial Approaches in Ethnographic Research”. In MultiPluriTrans in Educational Ethnography: Approaching the Multimodality, Plurality and Translocality of Educational Realities, edited by Bollig, S., M-S. Honig, S. Neumann and C. Seele. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag/Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, N. J., and P. Alldred. 2015. “New Materialist Social Inquiry: Designs, Methods and the Research-Assemblage.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18 (4):399–414. doi:10.1080/13645579.2014.921458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, N. J., and P. Alldred. 2018. “Mixed Methods, Materialism and the Micropolitics of the Research-Assemblage.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 21 (2):191–204. doi:10.1080/13645579.2017.1350015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulson, D. 2014. A Sting in the Tale: My Adventures with Bumblebees. London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M., and I. Duhn. 2015. “The Force of Gardening: Investigating Children’s Learning in a Food Garden.” Australian Journal of Environmental Education 31 (01):60–73. doi:10.1017/aee.2014.45.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. 2018. “What Is Ethnography? Can It Survive? Should It?” Ethnography and Education 13 (1):1–17. doi:10.1080/17457823.2017.1298458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 1983. Ethnology: Principles in Practice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, P., R. Nicol, and H. Ross. 2006. “Teachers’ Approaches and Attitudes to Engaging with the Natural Heritage Through the Curriculum.” PDF file. http://www.docs.hss.ed.ac.uk/education/outdoored/teachers_approaches_snh.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, K., and H. Lenz Taguchi. 2010. “Challenging Anthropocentric Analysis of Visual Data: A Relational Materialist Methodological Approach to Educational Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 23 (5):525–542. doi:10.1080/09518398.2010.500628.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y. 2013. “Posthumanist Ethnography of Mangling Practices.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26 (6):741–748. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788762.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. 1993. “Fertile Obsession: Validity after Poststructuralism.” The Sociological Quarterly 34 (4):673–693. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00112.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. 2000. “Against Empathy, Voice and Authenticity.” Women, Gender and Research 4:16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. 2016. “Top Ten + List: (Re) Thinking Ontology in (Post) Qualitative Research.” Cultural Studies, Critical Methodologies 16 (2):125–131. doi:10.1177/1532708616634734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learning through Landscapes (LtL). 2014. Polli:Nation Activity Plan 2015–18. Winchester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H. 2012. “A Diffractive and Deleuzian Approach to Analysing Interview Data.” Feminist Theory 13 (3):265–281. doi:10.1177/1464700112456001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, N. C., C. Woodsong, K. M. MacQueen, G. Guest, and F. Namey. 2005. Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector’s Field Guide. Family Health International.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. 2013a. “Researching without Representation? Language and Materiality in Post-Qualitative Methodology.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26 (6):658–667. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788755.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. 2013b. “Classification or wonder? Coding as an analytic practice in qualitative research”. In Deleuze and Research Methodologies, edited by Coleman, R. and J. Ringrose. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mannion, G., A. Fenwick, and J. Lynch. 2013. “Place-Responsive Pedagogy: Learning from Teachers’ Experiences of Excursions in Nature.” Environmental Education Research 19 (6):792–809. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.749980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannion, G. 2019. “Re-Assembling Environmental and Sustainability Education: orientations from New Materialism.” Environmental Education Research :1. doi:10.1080/13504622.2018.1536926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathar, T. 2008. “Review Essay: Making a Mess with Situational Analysis?” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9 (2). doi:10.17169/fqs-9.2.432.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. A. 2014. “Beyond an Easy Sense: A Diffractive Analysis.” Qualitative Inquiry 20 (6):742–746. doi:10.1177/1077800414530257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, L. A., B. Hall, and K. Tanita. 2013. “Animals, Plants, People, and Things: A Review of Multispecies Ethnography.” Environment and Society 4 (1):5–24. doi:10.3167/ares.2013.040102.
   Google Scholar
• Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., A. Taylor, and M. Blaise. 2016. “Decentring the human in multispecies ethnographies”. In Posthuman Research Practices in Education, edited by Taylor, C. and C. Hughes. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, E. B. 2018. “‘Data Found Us’: A Critique of Some New Materialist Tropes in Educational Research.” Research in Education 101 (1):5–16. doi:10.1177/0034523718792161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2009. Doing Sensory Ethnography. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L., and E. A. St. Pierre. 2005. “Writing: A method of inquiry”. In SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Denzin, N.K and Y. S. Lincoln (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M., C. Lundholm, and N. Hopwood. 2009. Environmental Learning: Insights from Research into the Student Experience. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Semetsky, I. 2015. “Deleuze’s philosophy for education”. In Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, edited by Peters, M. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Situational Analysis. 2018. “Frequently Asked Questions”. Accessed October 15 2018. http://clarkessituationalanalysis.blogspot.com/
   Google Scholar
• Springgay, S., and S. E. Truman. 2018. “On the Need for Methods beyond Proceduralism: Speculative Middles, (in) Tensions, and Response-Ability in Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 24 (3):203–214. doi:10.1177/1077800417704464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. 2011. “Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after”. In Sage Handbook of Qualitative Inquiry, edited by Denzin, N. K. and Y. S. Lincoln. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. 2014. “A Brief and Personal History of Post Qualitative Research: Toward ‘Post Inquiry.” Journal of Curriculum Theorizing 30 (2):2–19.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A., and A. Y. Jackson. 2014. “Qualitative Data Analysis after Coding.” Qualitative Inquiry 20 (6):715–719. doi:10.1177/1077800414532435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. 2017. “Writing Post Qualitative Inquiry.” Qualitative Inquiry. doi:10.1177/1077800417734567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. 2018. “Post Qualitative Inquiry in an Ontology of Immanence.” Qualitative Inquiry. doi:10.1177/1077800418772634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strom, K. J. 2018. “‘That’s Not Very Deleuzian’: Thoughts on Interrupting the Exclusionary Nature of ‘High Theory’.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (1):104–113. doi:10.1080/00131857.2017.1339340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., and V. Pacini-Ketchabaw. 2015. “Learning with Children, Ants, and Worms in the Anthropocene: Towards a Common World Pedagogy of Multispecies Vulnerability.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 23 (4):507–529. doi:10.1080/14681366.2015.1039050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A. 2016. “Edu-crafting a Cacophonous Ecology: Posthumanist Research Practices for Education”. In Posthuman Research Practices in Education, edited by Taylor, C.A and Hughes, C. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. 2017. “Beyond Stewardship: Common World Pedagogies for the Anthropocene.” Environmental Education Research 23 (10):1448–1461. doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1325452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. 2013. “More-than-Human Sociality”. In Anthropology and Nature, edited by Hastrup, K. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vannini, P. 2015. “Non-Representational Ethnography: New Ways of Animating Lifeworlds.” Cultural Geographies 22 (2):317–327. doi:10.1177/1474474014555657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar