Argumentation-supported educational comics as a teaching tool for environmental education

References

• Affeldt, F., D. Meinhart, and I. Eilks. 2018. “The Use of Comics in Experimental İnstructions in a Non-Formal Chemistry Learning Context.” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology 6 (1): 93–104. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.380620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afrilyasanti, R., and Y. Basthomi. 2011. “Adapting Comics and Cartoons to Develop 21st Century Learners.” Language in India 11 (11): 552–568.
   Google Scholar
• Akbas, Y., İ. F. Sahin, and E. Meral. 2019. “Implementing Argumentation-Based Science Learning Approach in Social Studies: Academic Achievement and Students’ Views.” Review of International Geographical Education Online 9 (1): 209–245.
   Google Scholar
• Ario, B. C., E. B. Oladumiye, and T. I. Ibiwoye. 2020. “Adopting Comic-Style Illustrations for Promoting Environmental Sustainability.” International Journal of Innovative Research and Development 9 (3): 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Aydın Yalcin, G. 2019. The Effect of Argumentation Based Science Learning Approach on Academic Success and Motivation of 9th Grade Students in a Physics Course. Atatürk University. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/.
   Google Scholar
• Aydogdu, Z. 2017. Investigation of Effects the Argumentation Based Science Teaching on the Academic Success, Motivation, İnterest and Attitudes towards Science. Sakarya University. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/.
   Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., N. Dunbar, D. Rodriguez, and S. J. Liu. 2011. “A Review of Humor in Educational Settings: Four Decades of Research.” Communication Education 60 (1): 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2010.496867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeve-de Pauw, J., and P. Van Petegem. 2017. “Because My Friends İnsist or Because İt Makes Sense? Adolescents’ Motivation towards the Environment.” Sustainability 9 (5): 750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton-Gary, C. 2012. “Connecting through Comics: Expanding Opportunities for Teaching and Learning.” US-China Education Review B (4): 389–395. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED533545.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bossley, J. P. 2016. Environmental İmpact from Outdoor/Environmental Education Programs: Effects of Frequent Stream Classes on Aquatic Macroinvertebrates. Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, J. 2012. “Information Comics: An Overview.” in Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 1–7. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=6408645&tag=1.
   Google Scholar
• Cheesman, K. 2006. “Using Comics in the Science Classroom.” Journal of College Science Teaching 35 (4): 48–51. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42991806.
   Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, A., and K. Korfiatis. 2019. “Children’s İnterest in School Garden Projects, Environmental Motivation and İntention to Act: A Case Study from a Primary School of Cyprus.” Applied Environmental Education & Communication 18 (1): 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2017.1419104
   Google Scholar
• Çiçek Şentürk, Ö. 2020. The Effect of Argumentation-Supported Educational Comics on Students’ Environmental İnterests, Motivation, and Academic Achievements and Student Experiences. Gazi University. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/.
   Google Scholar
• Çiçek Şentürk, Ö., and E. Sarac. 2017. “Science Teachers’ Opinions about Experience in out of School Learning Environments.” Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty 18 (3): 504–522.
   Google Scholar
• Çiçek Şentürk, Ö., and M. Selvi. 2021. “Science Course "Human and Environment" Unit Academic Achievement Test Development: Reliability and Validity Study.” Gazi University Journal of Gazi Education Faculty 41 (2): 601–630.
   Google Scholar
• Çiçek Şentürk, Ö., and M. Selvi. 2022. “Developing a Scale to Determine Secondary School Students’ Interests in the Environment.” Journal of Muallim Rıfat Faculty of Education (JMRFE) 4 (2): 219–233.
   Google Scholar
• Çiçek Şentürk, Özge, and Mahmut Selvi. 2019. “The Development of Environmental Motivation Scale at Secondary Schools and Analysis of Different Variables of Students’ Motivation towards Environment.” Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 14 (4): 218–236. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2019.220.13
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1992. “Statistical Power Analysis.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 1 (3): 98–101. . https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, K., J. Murdoch, S. Rayback, A. Seidl, and K. Wallin. 2017. “Students’ Understanding of Sustainability and Climate Change across Linked Service-Learning Courses.” Journal of Geoscience Education 65 (2): 158–167. https://doi.org/10.5408/16-168.1
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approach. 2nd ed. Callifornia: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 4th ed. MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. L. Plano Clark. 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Darnhofer, I. 2018. “Using Comic-Style Posters for Engaging Participants and for Promoting Researcher Reflexivity.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 17 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918804716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilber-Ozer, Z., and Z. N. Baysal. 2022. “Learning Places, Teaching Methods, Techniques and Materials Used in General Studies (Sachunterricht) Lesson by Teachers in German Primary Schools’ Third Grade.” Education 50 (7): 934–953. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1926527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis, J., and D. Jacobs. 2021. “Making Environmental Education Accessible for All Students: İnclusion of Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities.” Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities 24 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14448/jsesd.13.0004
   Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., S. Ashtarian, and G. Zamani. 2020. “Exploring Arguments Presented in Predatory Journals Using Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation.” Journal of Academic Ethics 18 (4): 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09346-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faize, F. A., and M. Akhtar. 2020. “Addressing Environmental Knowledge and Environmental Attitude in Undergraduate Students through Scientific Argumentation.” Journal of Cleaner Production 252: 119928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faize, F. A., W. Husain, and F. Nisar. 2017. “A Critical Review of Scientific Argumentation in Science Education.” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14 (1): 475–483. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, S. C. 2021. “The Pro-Environmental Behavior Patterns of College Students Adapting to Climate Change.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 20 (5): 700–715. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, W. T., A. A. Hassan, and B. A. LePage. 2022. “Introduction to Environmental Education.” In The Living Environmental Education: Sound Science toward a Cleaner, Safer, and Healthier Future, 3–24. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Fettahlıoglu, P., and M. Aydogdu. 2020. “Developing Environmentally Responsible Behaviours through the İmplementation of Argumentation-and Problem-Based Learning Models.” Research in Science Education 50 (3): 987–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingold Seaman, L. 2017. Exploring Student Engagement and Middle-School Students’ Perceptions of Humor Used as a Teaching Tool. Northcentral University. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1906693008?pq-origsite=gscholar.
   Google Scholar
• González-Howard, M., and K. L. McNeill. 2019. “Teachers’ Framing of Argumentation Goals: Working Together to Develop İndividual versus Communal Understanding.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 56 (6): 821–844. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C., V. J. Caracelli, and W. F. Graham. 1989. “Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11 (3): 255–274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, D. 2017. Beyond Super Heroes and Talking Animals: Social Justice in Graphic Novels in Education. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1979947299?pq-origsite=gscholar.
   Google Scholar
• Gultekin, S. B., and T. Altun. 2022. “Investigating the İmpact of Activities Based on Scientific Process Skills on 4th Grade Students’ Problem-Solving Skills.” International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education 14 (4): 491–500.
   Google Scholar
• Gürsoy, H. C. 2018. Using Comic Book as a Supporter to Develop Reading Habits. Erciyes University. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/.
   Google Scholar
• Hackathorn, J., A. M. Garczynski, K. Blankmeyer, R. D. Tennial, and E. D. Solomon. 2011. “All Kidding Aside: Humor Increases Learning at Knowledge and Comprehension Levels.” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 11 (4): 116–123. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ956757.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hansmann, R., and N. Steimer. 2015. “Linking an İntegrative Behavior Model to Elements of Environmental Campaigns: An Analysis of Face-to-Face Communication and Posters against Littering.” Sustainability 7 (6): 6937–6956. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7066937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasancebi, F. 2014. The İmpacts of Argument-Based İnquiry (ABI) Approach on Students’ Science Achievements, Argument Skill and Personal Development. Doctoral Dissertation, Atatürk University.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, K. 1973. “Comic Books: Conduits to Culture?” The Reading Teacher 27 (1): 54–55. https://dokumen.tips/documents/comic-books-conduits-to-culture.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hofman, K., and K. Hughes. 2018. “Protecting the Great Barrier Reef: Analysing the İmpact of a Conservation Documentary and Post-Viewing Strategies on Long-Term Conservation Behaviour.” Environmental Education Research 24 (4): 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1303820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoły-Łuczaj, Magdalena, and Kamil Luczaj. 2021. “On the Alternative Approach to Artifacts in Environmental Education.” International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education 11 (2): 111–126. https://doi.org/10.18497/iejeegreen.781724
   Google Scholar
• Hosler, J., and K. B. Boomer. 2011. “Are Comic Books an Effective Way to Engage Nonmajors in Learning and Appreciating Science?” CBE Life Sciences Education 10 (3): 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-07-0090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., X. Zheng, and H. Kim. 2021. “Effects of Scaffolding Types and İndividual Metacognition Levels on Learning Achievement in Online Collaborative Argumentation.” Educational Technology International 22 (2): 311–339.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, K. 1949. “An Experiment in the Use of Comics as İnstructional Material.” Journal of Educational Sociology 23 (4): 236–245. https://doi.org/10.2307/2264559
   Google Scholar
• Ilhan, G. O. 2016. Use of Comics in Social Studies Teaching. Afyon Kocatepe University. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/.
   Google Scholar
• Indawati, N., F. T. P. Andariana, and D. Pristyoawti. 2022. “IPS Learning on Natural Environmental Material and Artificial Environment Based on Contextual Teaching and Learning through İnteractive Comic Media.” Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal 8 (2): 1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.37905/aksara.8.2.1085-1092.2022
   Google Scholar
• Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., and Stick, S. L. 2006. “Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice.” Field Methods 18 (1): 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpudewan, M., and N. S. Mohd Ali Khan. 2017. “Experiential-Based Climate Change Education: Fostering Students’ Knowledge and Motivation towards the Environment.” International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 26 (3): 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017.1330037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kılıckaya, F., and J. Krajka. 2012. “Can the Use of Web-Based Comic Strip Creation Tool Facilitate EFL Learners’ Grammar and Sentence Writing?” British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (6): E161–E165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01298.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisiel, J. 2005. “Understanding Elementary Teacher Motivations for Science Fieldtrips.” Science Education 89 (6): 936–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleespies, M. W., L. Doderer, P. W. Dierkes, and V. Wenzel. 2021. “Nature İnterest Scale-Development and Evaluation of a Measurement İnstrument for Individual İnterest in Nature.” Frontiers in Psychology 12: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.774333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. 2016. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 4th ed. New York, UK: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koenke, K. 1981. “The Careful Use of Comic Books.” Reading Teacher 34: 592–595. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20195292.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A1de8dec0f3a98039e6dd4560a1db50fe.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, J. L., and R. E. Bleicher. 2017. “Argumentation as a Strategy for İncreasing Preservice Teachers’ Understanding of Climate Change, a Key Global Socioscientific İssue.” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology 5 (1): 101–112. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.21523
   Google Scholar
• Lazarou, D., S. Erduran, and R. Sutherland. 2017. “Argumentation in Science Education as an Evolving Concept: Following the Object of Activity.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 14: 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzarich, M. 2013. “Comic Strip Humour and Empathy as Methodological İnstruments in Teaching.” Croatian Journal of Education 15 (1): 153–190. https://hrcak.srce.hr/100094.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C. J., and M. C. Monroe. 2019. “Exploring the Essential Psychological Factors in Fostering Hope concerning Climate Change.” Environmental Education Research 25 (6): 936–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1367916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S. F., and H. S. Lin. 2016. “Learning Nanotechnology with Texts and Comics: The İmpacts on Students of Different Achievement Levels.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (8): 1373–1391. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1191089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S. F., H. Lin, L. Lee, and D. L. Yore. 2015. “Are Science Comics a Good Medium for Science Communication? The Case for Public Learning of Nanotechnology.” International Journal of Science Education 5 (3): 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2014.941040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. R., B. Fan, and K. Xie. 2020. “The İnfluence of a Web-Based Learning Environment on Low Achievers’ Science Argumentation.” Computers & Education 151: 103860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markaki, V. 2014. “Environmental Education through Inquiry and Technology.” Science Education International 25 (1): 86–92.
   Google Scholar
• McNicol, S. 2016. “The Potential of Educational Comics as a Health İnformation Medium.” Health İnformation and Libraries Journal 34 (1): 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meral, Elif, Fatih Kayaalp, and Zeynep Başci-Namli. 2022. “The Role of Argumentative Writing in Teaching Controversial Issues: A Mixed Methods Research.” International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research 9 (1): 143–163. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.103341
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, J., A. Choi, and B. Hand. 2011. “Implementation of the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) Approach in 8th Grade Science Classrooms.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 9 (5): 1111–1133. . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9250-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikmah, Syafridatun, Faruq, Haroky, Insih, Wilujeng, Heru, Kuswanto, and Jumadi. 2019. Development of Android Comic Media for the Chapter of Newton’s Gravity to Map Learning Motivation of Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1233 (1): 012051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012051
   Google Scholar
• Nikolayenko, O. 2011. “Adolescents’ Hopes for Personal, Local, and Global Future: Insights from Ukraine.” Youth & Society 43 (1): 64–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/00441.18X09351281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntanos, S., G. L. Kyriakopoulos, G. Arabatzis, V. Palios, and M. Chalikias. 2018. “Environmental Behavior of Secondary Education Students: A Case Study at Central Greece.” Sustainability 10 (5): 1663. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojala, M. 2012. “Hope and Climate Change: The İmportance of Hope for Environmental Engagement among Young People.” Environmental Education Research 18 (5): 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.637157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojala, M., and H. Bengtsson. 2019. “Young People’s Coping Strategies concerning Climate Change: Relations to Perceived Communication with Parents and Friends and Proenvironmental Behavior.” Environment and Behavior 51 (8): 907–935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518763894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, J. C. 2008. The Comic Strip as a Medium for Promoting Science Literacy . California State University Northridge. https://pdfslide.net/documents/the-comic-strip-as-a-medium-for-promoting-science-jco69120coursework697projectsolsonactionresearchthe.html.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Erduran, and S. Simon. 2004. “Enhancing the Quality of Argumentation in School Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (10): 994–1020. . https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oweini, A., and A. Houri. 2006. “Factors Affecting Environmental Knowledge and Attitudes among Lebanese College Students.” Applied Environmental Education & Communication 5 (2): 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15330150600648945
   Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. 2013. SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis. 5th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press / Mc Graw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pathoni, H Alrizal, and Febriyanti, S. 2020. “The Folklore-Based Comic to İncrease Students’ Motivation in Physics Learning.” Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 8 (4): 1471–1482.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2014. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Pekel, F. O. 2019. “Effectiveness of Argumentation-Based Concept Cartoons on Teaching Global Warming, Ozone Layer Depletion, and Acid Rain.” Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology 20 (2): 945–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T., A. Rendigs, and C. P. Maminirina. 2015. “Conservation Messages in Speech Bubbles–Evaluation of an Environmental Education Comic Distributed in Elementary Schools in Madagascar.” Sustainability 7 (7): 8855–8880. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7078855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruchter, M., B. Klar, and W. Geiger. 2010. “Comparing the Effects of Mobile Computers and Traditional Approaches in Environmental Education.” Computers & Education 54 (4): 1054–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaňa, J. 2012. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., and L. Gleim. 2009. “Argument-Driven İnquiry to Promote the Understanding of İmportant Concepts & Practices in Biology.” The American Biology Teacher 71 (8): 465–472. https://doi.org/10.2307/20565359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., and M. R. Blanchard. 2012. “Science Teachers and Scientific Argumentation: Trends in Views and Practice.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (9): 1122–1148. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaal, S., and A. Lude. 2015. “Using Mobile Devices in Environmental Education and Education for Sustainable development-Comparing Theory and Practice in a Nation Wide Survey.” Sustainability 7 (8): 10153–10170. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentürk, M. 2023. “Social Studies Pre-Service Teachers’ Educational Comics Experience for Disaster Education.” International Journal on Social and Education Sciences (IJonSES) 5 (1): 153–166. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.511
   Google Scholar
• Sentürk, M., and U. Simsek. 2021. “Educational Comics and Educational Cartoons as Teaching Material in the Social Studies Course.” African Educational Research Journal 9 (2): 515–525.
   Google Scholar
• Sentürk, M., and U. Simsek. 2022. “The Effect of Educational Comics and Educational Cartoons on Student Attitude and Motivation in Social Studies Course.” International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches 7 (17): 378–413.
   Google Scholar
• Slimani, M., J. M. Lange, and M. Håkansson. 2021. “The Political Dimension in Environmental Education Curricula: Towards an İntegrative Conceptual and Analytical Framework.” Environmental Education Research 27 (3): 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1879023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, W. M. W., N. Y. I. Cheng, C. F. Chow, and Y. Zhan. 2016. “Learning about the Types of Plastic Wastes: Effectiveness of İnquiry Learning Strategies.” Education 3-13 44 (3): 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2014.976239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spörk, A., A. Martinuzzi, F. Findler, and H. Vogel-Pöschl. 2023. “When Students Write Comedy Scripts: Humor as an Experiential Learning Method in Environmental Education.” Environmental Education Research 29 (4): 552–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2136626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strick, M., R. W. Holland, R. Van Baaren, and A. Van Knippenberg. 2009. “Humor in the Eye Tracker: Attention Capture and Distraction from Context Cues.” The Journal of General Psychology 137 (1): 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221300903293055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2013. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Tanrıverdi, B. 2009. “Analyzing Primary School Curriculum in Terms of Sustainable Environmental Education.” Education and Science 34 (151): 89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatalovic, M. 2009. “Science Comics as Tools for Science Education and Communication: A Brief, Exploratory Study.” Journal of Science Communication 08 (04): A02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.08040202
   Google Scholar
• Topkaya, Y. 2016. “The İmpact of İnstructional Comics on the Cognitive and Affective Learning about Environmental Problems.” Ted Eğitim Ve BİLİM 41 (187): 199–219. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.5713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topkaya, Y., and B. Yılar. 2015. “Analysis Student Views Related to Educative Comics.” Route Educational and Social Science Journal 2 (6): 106–106. http://www.ressjournal.com/Makaleler/2102797538_8 Yavuz Topkaya.pdf. https://doi.org/10.17121/ressjournal.333
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. 2003. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallner, L. 2020. “Kid Friendly? Constructions of Comics Literacy in the Classroom.” Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29 (1): 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947020910626
   Google Scholar
• Wolschke-Bulmahn, J., and G. Gröning. 1994. “Children’s Comics: An Opportunity for Education to Know and to Care for Nature?” Children’s Environments 11 (3): 232–242. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41515265?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M. 2015. The Effect of Graphic Novel Supplements on Reading Comprehension and Motivation in Secondary Students. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1766580310.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, G. 2003. Comics in Education. http://www.humblecomics.com/comicsedu/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, K. H., and H. C. She. 2010. “On-Line Synchronous Scientific Argumentation Learning: Nurturing Students’ Argumentation Ability and Conceptual Change in Science Context.” Computers & Education 55 (2): 586–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Q., A. Xu, and D. Kong. 2017. “Environmental Education, Knowledge Management and Professional Performance in Eco-Tourism: The İmpact Relatedness.” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education 13 (8): 4679–4687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar