Elementary students’ ‘outdoor – digital’ explorations in ecology - learning through chains of transduction

References

• Anderhag, P., P. Emanuelsson, P.-O. Wickman, and K. M. Hamza. 2013. “Students’ Choice of Post-Compulsory Science: In Search of Schools That Compensate for the Socioeconomic Background of Their Students.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (18): 3141–3160. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.696738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardoin, N. M., and A. W. Bowers. 2020. “Early Childhood Environmental Education: A Systematic Review of the Research Literature.” Educational Research Review 31: 100353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ärlemalm-Hagsér, E., and A. Sandberg. 2017. “Early Childhood Education for Sustainability: The Relationship between Students’ Participation Agency-Children and Nature.” In The SAGE Handbook of Outdoor Play and Learning, edited by T. Waller, E. Ärlemalm-Hagsér, E. B. H. Sandseter, L. Lee-hammond, K. Lekies, and S. Wyver, 213–228. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, K. 2015. “Wasps-Bees-Mushrooms-Children: Reimagining Multispecies Relations in Early Childhood Pedagogies.” Journal of Childhood Studies 40 (2): 67–79. https://doi.org/10.18357/jcs.v40i2.15180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthel, S., S. Belton, C. M. Raymond, and M. Giusti. 2018. “Fostering Children’s Connection to Nature through Authentic Situations: The Case of Saving Salamanders at School.” Frontiers in Psychology 9 (928): 928. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00928
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beery, T. H. 2013. “Establishing Reliability and Construct Validity for an Instrument to Measure Environmental Connectedness.” Environmental Education Research 19 (1): 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.687045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. 2016. “Thinking like a Brick: Posthumanism and Building Materials.” In Posthuman Research Practices in Education, edited by C. A. Taylor and C. Hughes, 58–74. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., and G. Kress. 2015. Multimodality, Learning and Communication: A Social Semiotic Frame. Ner York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. J. J. 2015. Beyond Learning: Democratic Education for a Human Future. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., and M. Tedder. 2007. “Agency and Learning in the Lifecourse: Towards an Ecological Perspective.” Studies in the Education of Adults 39 (2): 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caiman, C., and I. Lundegård. 2014. “Pre-School Children’s Agency in Learning for Sustainable Development.” Environmental Education Research 20 (4): 437–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.812722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capra, F. 1997. The Web of Life. New York: Anchor books.
   Google Scholar
• Casper, A. M. A., and M. M. Balgopal. 2018. “Conceptual Change in Natural Resource Management Students’ Ecological Literacy.” Environmental Education Research 24 (8): 1159–1176. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1350830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla, L. 2015. “Benefits of Nature Contact for Children.” Journal of Planning Literature 30 (4): 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215595441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla, L., K. Keena, I. Pevec, and E. Stanley. 2014. “Green Schoolyards as Havens from Stress and Resources for Resilience in Childhood and Adolescence.” Health & Place 28: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherrett, J. M. 1989. Key Concepts: The Results to a Survey of Our Members Opinions in Ecological Concepts, edited by J. M. Cherrett, 6–7. London, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cutter-Mackenzie, A., and R. Smith. 2003. “Ecological Literacy: The ‘Missing Paradigm’ in Environmental Education (Part One).” Environmental Education Research 9 (4): 497–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462032000126131
   Google Scholar
• Churchman, C. W. 1967. “Guest Editorial: Wicked Problems.” Management Science 14 (4): B141–B142.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. 2014. Listening to Children: Being and Becoming. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1925/1958. Experience and Nature. Dover: Dover Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1934/1980. Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books, Berkely Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1938/1997. Experience & Education. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz, S., U. Pascual, M. Stenseke, B. Martín-López, R. T. Watson, Z. Molnár, R. Hill, et al. 2018. “Assessing Nature’s Contributions to People: Recognizing Culture, and Diverse Sources of Knowledge, Can Improve Assessments.” Science (New York, NY) 359 (6373): 270–272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826
   Google Scholar
• Duhn, I. 2012. “Making ‘Place’ for Ecological Sustainability in Early Childhood Education.” Environmental Education Research 18 (1): 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.572162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duhn, I., K. Malone, and M. Tesar. 2017. “Troubling the Intersections of Urban/Nature/Childhood in Environmental Education.” Environmental Education Research 23 (10): 1357–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1390884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, K., R. Fincher, and D. B. Rose. 2010. An Ethics for Living in the Anthropocene. Academy of Social Sciences in Australia Workshop Report. Accessed May 5. https://cms.assa.edu.au/.pdf/reports/ASSA_WorkshopReport_73.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hannigan, S., P.-O. Wickman, J. P. Ferguson, V. Prain, and R. Tytler. 2022. “The Role of Aesthetics in Learning Science in an Art-Science Lesson.” International Journal of Science Education 44 (5): 797–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1909773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hedefalk, M., C. Caiman, C. Ottander, and J. Almqvist. 2021. “Didactical Dilemmas When Planning Teaching for Sustainable Development in Preschool.” Environmental Education Research 27 (1): 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1823321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häggström, M. 2020. “Aesthetical Experiences in Direct Nature Meetings. A Phenomenological Study on Experiences of Forest, Plants and Education.” Diss. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.
   Google Scholar
• Häggström, M., and C. Schmidt. 2020. “Enhancing Children’s Literacy and Ecological Literacy through Critical Place-Based Pedagogy.” Environmental Education Research 26 (12): 1729–1745. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1812537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägglund, S., and I. Pramling Samuelsson. 2009. “Early Childhood and Education for Sustainable Development and Citizenship.” International Journal of Early Childhood 41 (2): 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168878
   Google Scholar
• Jickling, B., and S. Blenkinsop. 2020. “Wilding Teacher Education: Responding to the Cries of Nature.” Canadian Journal of Environmental Education 23 (1): 121–138.
   Google Scholar
• Kjällander, S. 2011. Designs for Learning in an Extended Digital Environment. Case Studies of Social Interaction in the Social Science Classroom. Stockholm: Diss. Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Kjällander, S. 2019. “Forskningsperspektiv på Digitala Verktyg i Förskolan.” In Digitalisering i en Förskola på Vetenskaplig Grund, edited by S. Kjällander and B. Riddersporre. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Kjällander, S., and F. Moinian. 2014. “Digital Tablets and Applications in Preschool Everyday Practices, Preschoolers’ Creative Challenges of Didactic Designs.” Designs for Learning 7 (1): 10–33. https://doi.org/10.2478/dfl-2014-0009
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2009. “What is Mode?” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, edited by Jewitt, C. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality. A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2018. Down to Earth. Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloro-Bidart, T. 2017. “Neoliberal and Disciplinary Environmentality and ‘Sustainable Seafood’ Consumption: Storying Environmentally Responsible Action.” Environmental Education Research 23 (8): 1182–1199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1105198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manches, A., C. O’Malley, and S. Benford. 2010. “The Role of Physical Representations in Solving Number Problems: A Comparison of Young Children’s Use of Physical and Virtual Materials.” Computers & Education 54 (3): 622–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavers, D. 2011. Children’s Writing and Drawing as Design: The Remarkable in the Unremarkable. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, B. B., C. A. Brewer, A. R. Berkowitz, and W. T. Borrie. 2013. “Environmental Literacy, Ecological Literacy, Ecoliteracy: What Do we Mean and How Do we Get Here?” Ecosphere 4 (5): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00075.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MODE. 2012. Glossary of Multimodal Terms. Accessed 23 June 2022. https://multimodalityglossary.wordpress.com/mode-2/.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. 2014. Nature Play & Learning Places. Creating and Managing Places Where Children Engage with Nature. 1st ed. Raleigh, NC: Natural Learning Initiative and Reston.
   Google Scholar
• Newfield, D. 2014. “Transformation, Transduction and the Transmodal Moment.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, edited by C. Jewitt, 100–113. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, J., and L. Östman. 2019. “Different Teaching Traditions in Environmental and Sustainability Education.” In Sustainable Development Teaching – Ethical and Political Challenges, edited by K. Van Poeck, L. Östman, and J. Öhman, 70–83. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, J., and L. Sund. 2021. “A Didactic Model of Sustainability Commitment.” Sustainability 13 (6): 3083. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, L. M. 2013. “Taking Children’s Questions Seriously. The Need for Creative Thought.” Global Studies of Childhood 3 (3): 230–253. https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2013.3.3.230
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, L. M., G. Dahlberg, and E. Theorell. 2016. “Displacing Identity—Placing Aesthetics: Early Childhood Literacy in a Globalized World.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 37 (5): 717–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1075711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östman, L., K. Van Poeck, and J. Öhman. 2019. “Principles for Sustainable Development Teaching.” In Sustainable Development Teaching -Ethical and Political Challenges, edited by K. Van Poeck, J. Öhman, and M. Öhman, 40–55. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, D. W. 1992. Ecological Literacy: Education and Transition to a Postmodern World. Albany, NY: SUNY press.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, K., M. Andrée, and C. Caiman. 2022. “Down-to-Earth Ecological Literacy through Human and Nonhuman Encounters in Fieldwork.” The Journal of Environmental Education 53 (2): 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2022.2046534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponterotto, J. G. 2006. “Brief Note on the Origins, Evolution, and Meaning of the Qualitative Research Concept ‘Thick Description.” Qualitative Report 11 (3): 538–549.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. 2001. “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. From on the Horizon.” On the Horizon 9 (5): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
   Google Scholar
• Robson, S. 2011. “Producing and Using Video Data in the Early Years: Ethical Questions and Practical Consequences in Research with Young Children.” Children & Society 25 (3): 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00267.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousell, D. 2021. “Cosmopolitical Encounters in Environmental Education: Becoming-Ecological in the Intertidal Zones of Bundjalung National Park.” The Journal of Environmental Education 52 (2): 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1863313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandell, K., and J. Öhman. 2010. “Educational Potentials of Encounters with Nature: Reflections from the Swedish Outdoor Perspective.” Environmental Education Research 16 (1): 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903504065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, L., and C. Lundholm. 2010. “Learning for Resilience? Exploring Learning Opportunities in Biosphere Reserves.” Environmental Education Research 16 (5–6): 645–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.505442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. 2020. “25 Years on: Looking Back at Environmental Education Research.” Environmental Education Research 26 (12): 1681–1689. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1869185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selander, S. 2008. “Tecken För Lärande − Tecken på Lärande: Ett Designteoretiskt Perspektiv.” In Design för Lärande, edited by S. Selander and A.-L. Rostvall, 28–43. Stockholm: Norstedts akademiska förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Selander, S. 2009. “Didaktisk Design.” In Didaktisk Design i Digital Miljö - Nya Möjligheter För Lärande, edited by S. Selander and E. Svärdemo-Åberg, 17–35. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Selander, S. 2017. Didaktiken Efter Vygotskij: Design För Lärande. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Selander, S., and G. Kress. 2010. Design För Lärande: Ett Multimodalt Perspektiv. Stockholm: Norstedts Akademiska Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. 2011. Against Ecological Sovereignty. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. 2013. “Ecological Community, the Sense of the World, and Senseless Extinction.” Environmental Humanities 2 (1): 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3610333
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., K. Richardson, J. Rockström, S. E. Cornell, I. Fetzer, E. M. Bennett, R. Biggs, et al. 2015. “Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet.” Science (New York, NY) 347 (6223): 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. 2020. Research Ethics. Accessed 11 May 2022. http://www.codex.vr.se/texts/HSFR.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., and V. Pacini-Ketchabaw. 2015. “Learning with Children, Ants, and Worms in the Anthropocene: Towards a Common World Pedagogy of Multispecies Vulnerability.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 23 (4): 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1039050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Government. 2017. Nationell digitaliseringsstrategi för skolväsendet. U2017/04119/S. Stockholm: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. M. 2018. iGen Smartphonegenerationen. Hur Mår de? Vad Tänker de? Vad Vill de? Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K., and J. Vandenabeele. 2012. “Learning from Sustainable Development: Education in the Light of Public Issues.” Environmental Education Research 18 (4): 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.633162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wals, A. E. J., V. C. Tassone, G. P. Hampson, and J. Reams. 2016. “Learning for Walking the Change: Eco-Social Innovation through Sustainability-Oriented Higher Education.” In Routledge Handbook of Higher Education for Sustainable Development, edited by M. Barth, G. Michelsen, M. Rieckmann, and I. Thomas, 25–39. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P., and A. M. Khademian. 2008. “Wicked Problems, Knowledge Challenges, and Collaborative Capacity Builders in Network Settings.” Public Administration Review 68 (2): 334–349. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weldemariam, K. 2020. “Becoming-with Bees’: generating Affect and Response-Abilities with the Dying Bees in Early Childhood Education.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 41 (3): 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2019.1607402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickman, P.-O., and L. Östman. 2002. “Induction as an Empirical Problem: How Students Generalize during Practical Work.” International Journal of Science Education 24 (5): 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110074756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. 1992. The Diversity of Life (Questions of Science). New York: Norton & Company LTD.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1953/1996. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar