What does nature mean to you? A photo analysis of urban middle school students’ perceptions of nature

References

• Ahn, S. J.-G., J. Bostick, E. Ogle, K. Nowak, K. McGillicuddy, and J. Bailenson. 2016. “Experiencing Nature: Embodying Animals in Immersive Virtual Environments Increases Inclusion of Nature in Self and Involvement with Nature.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 21 (6): 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardoin, N. M., M. DiGiano, J. Bundy, S. Chang, N. Holthuis, and K. O’Connor. 2014. “Using Digital Photography and Journaling in Evaluation of Field-Based Environmental Education Programs.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 41: 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balding, M., and K. J. Williams. 2016. “Plant Blindness and the Implications for Plant Conservation.” Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 30 (6): 1192–1199. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckley, T., R. Stedman, S. Wallace, and M. Ambard. 2007. “Snapshots of What Matters Most: Using Resident-Employed Photography to Articulate Attachment to Place.” Society & Natural Resources 20 (10): 913–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920701537007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezeljak, P., G. Torkar, and A. Möller. 2023. “Understanding Austrian Middle School Students’ Connectedness with Nature.” The Journal of Environmental Education 54 (3): 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2023.2188577
   Google Scholar
• Bignante, E. 2010. “The Use of Photo-Elicitation in Field Research. Exploring Maasai Representations and Use of Natural Resources.” EchoGéo (11). https://doi.org/10.4000/echogeo.11622
   Google Scholar
• Billmann-Mahecha, E., and U. Gebhard. 2009. ““If We Had No Flowers…” Children, Nature, and Aesthetics.” The Journal of Developmental Processes, 4 (1): 24–42.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, J., C. Rishbeth, and S. R. Payne. 2020. “Nature Doesn’t Judge You – How Urban Nature Supports Young People’s Mental Health and Wellbeing in a Diverse UK City.” Health & Place 62: 102296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BMBWF. 2023. “Gesamte Rechtsvorschrift für Lehrpläne – allgemeinbildende höhere Schulen.” Fassung vom 2.1.2023. BGBl. II Nr. 1/2023 [Complete legal regulation for curricula - academic track secondary schools, version from 2.1.2023. BGBl. II Nr. 1/2023].
   Google Scholar
• Bolzan-de-Campos, C., B. Fedrizzi, and C.-R. Santos-Almeida. 2018. “How Do Children from Different Settings Perceive and Define Nature? A Qualitative Study Conducted with Children from Southern Brazil/¿Cómo Niños de Contextos Diferentes Perciben y Definen la Naturaleza? Estudio Cualitativo Con Niños Del Sur de Brasil.” Psyecology 9 (2): 177–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2018.1432526
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, E., N. Daykin, and J. Coad. 2016. “Participatory Photography in Qualitative Research: A Methodological Review.” Visual Methodologies 4 (2): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Cappello, M. 2005. “Photo Interviews: Eliciting Data through Conversations with Children.” Field Methods, 17 (2): 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05274553
   Google Scholar
• Cincera, J., B. Valesova, S. Krepelkova, P. Simonova, and R. Kroufek. 2019. “Place-Based Education from Three Perspectives.” Environmental Education Research 25 (10): 1510–1523. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1651826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, S., and G. Myers. 2015. Conservation Psychology: Understanding and Promoting Human Care for Nature. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1960. “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 (1): 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P. J. 2002. “Geology of Mankind.” Nature 415 (6867): 23–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/415023a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derr, V., and J. Simons. 2020. “A Review of Photovoice Applications in Environment, Sustainability, and Conservation Contexts: Is the Method Maintaining Its Emancipatory Intents?” Environmental Education Research 26 (3): 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1693511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, E. 2013. “The Misdiagnosis: Rethinking “Nature-Deficit Disorder”.” Environmental Communication 7 (3): 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2013.802704
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R. 1985. Ebook: Children’s Ideas in Science. London: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Dutcher, D. D., J. C. Finley, A. E. Luloff, and J. B. Johnson. 2007. “Connectivity with Nature as a Measure of Environmental Values.” Environment and Behavior 39 (4): 474–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506298794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. C., and B. M. H. Larson. 2020. “When Screens Replace Backyards: Strategies to Connect Digital-Media-Oriented Young People to Nature.” Environmental Education Research 26 (7): 950–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1776844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. R. 2019. “The Broader Importance of #FridaysForFuture.” Nature Climate Change 9 (6): 430–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0484-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, K., L. Bray, T. Water, A. Dickinson, J. Arnott, and B. Carter. 2017. “Auto-Driven Photo Elicitation Interviews in Research with Children: Ethical and Practical Considerations.” Comprehensive Child and Adolescent Nursing 40 (2): 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694193.2016.1273977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaston, K. J., and M. Soga. 2020. “Extinction of Experience: The Need to Be More Specific.” People and Nature 2 (3): 575–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10118
   Google Scholar
• Herrick, I. R., M. A. Lawson, and A. M. Matewos. 2022. “Through the Eyes of a Child: Exploring and Engaging Elementary Students’ Climate Conceptions through Photovoice.” Educational and Developmental Psychologist 39 (1): 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2021.2004862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horolets, A., M. Stodolska, and K. Peters. 2019. “Natural Environments and Leisure among Rural–to–Urban Immigrants: An Application of Bourdieu’s Concepts of Habitus, Social and Cultural Capital, and Field.” Leisure Sciences 41 (4): 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2018.1448023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibanez, M. C. 2004. “Framing the Social World with Photo-Elicitation Interviews.” The American Behavioral Scientist 47: 1527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764204266236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2022. “Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability.” Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Issue.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, M. 2009. “Nature and Self—An Ambivalent Attachment?” Ecopsychology 1 (1): 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2008.0003
   Google Scholar
• Kals, E., D. Schumacher, and L. Montada. 1999. “Emotional Affinity toward Nature as a Motivational Basis to Protect Nature.” Environment and Behavior 31 (2): 178–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, R. J., L. M. Given, J. M. Martin, and D. F. Hochuli. 2022. “Urban Children and Adolescents’ Perspectives on the Importance of Nature.” Environmental Education Research 28 (10): 1547–1563. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2080810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R., and E. O. Wilson. 1993. The Biophilia Hypothesis. Vol. 4. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleespies, M. W., T. Braun, P. W. Dierkes, and V. Wenzel. 2021. “Measuring Connection to Nature-A Illustrated Extension of the Inclusion of Nature in Self Scale.” Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland) 13 (4): 1761. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, H., A. Baer, E. Laurier, S. Petschke, and B. Schnettler. 2008. “Visual Analysis. New Developments in the Interpretative Analysis of Video and Photography.” Forum, Qualitative Social Research 9 (9): 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., and J. Agyeman. 2002. “Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behavior?” Environmental Education Research, 8 (3): 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
   Google Scholar
• Kossack, A., and F. X. Bogner. 2012. “How Does a One-Day Environmental Education Programme Support Individual Connectedness with Nature?” Journal of Biological Education 46 (3): 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.634016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuckartz, U., and S. Rädiker. 2019. Analyzing Qualitative Data with MAXQDA. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kuss, D. J., and M. D. Griffiths. 2017. “Social Networking Sites and Addiction: Ten Lessons Learned.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14 (3): 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14030311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langmann, S., and D. Pick. 2018. Photography as a Social Research Method. Singapore: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, L. R., R. Szczytko, E. P. Bowers, L. E. Stephens, K. T. Stevenson, and M. F. Floyd. 2019. “Outdoor Time, Screen Time, and Connection to Nature: Troubling Trends among Rural Youth?” Environment and Behavior 51 (8): 966–991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518806686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaver, T., T. Highfield, and C. Abidin. 2020. Instagram: Visual Social Media Cultures. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lehman-Frisch, S., J.-Y. Authier, and F. Dufaux. 2012. “"Draw Me Your Neighborhood": A Gentrified Paris Neighbourhood through Its Children’s Eyes.” Children’s Geographies 10 (1): 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2011.638175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenart, B. A. (2020). A Wholesome Anthropocentrism: Reconceptualizing the Value of Nature within the Framework of an Enlightened Self-Interest. Ethics & the Environment, 25(2), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.25.2.05
   Google Scholar
• Louv, R. 2006. Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder. 6th ed. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonqun Books of Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lovelock, K., B. Lovelock, C. Jellum, and A. Thompson. 2011. “In Search of Belonging: Immigrant Experiences of Outdoor Nature-Based Settings in New Zealand.” Leisure Studies 30 (4): 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2011.623241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, K. 2016. “Reconsidering Children’s Encounters with Nature and Place Using Posthumanism.” Australian Journal of Environmental Education 32 (1): 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2015.48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattouk, M., and S. N. Talhouk. 2017. “A Content Analysis of Nature Photographs Taken by Lebanese Rural Youth.” Plos ONE 12 (5): E0177079. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, M., and F. Bogner. 2020a. “First Steps towards Sustainability? University Freshmen Perceptions on Nature versus Environment.” Plos ONE 15 (6): e0234560. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, M., and F. Bogner. 2020b. “Modelling Environmental Literacy with Environmental Knowledge, Values and (Reported) Behaviour.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 65: 100863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2010. “Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken (11., aktualisierte und überarb. Aufl. ed.).” Beltz. http://www.content-select.com/index.php?id=bib_view&ean=9783407291424 https://ubdata.univie.ac.at/AC08813808
   Google Scholar
• Meo, A. I. 2010. “Picturing Students’ Habitus: The Advantages and Limitations of Photo-Elicitation Interviewing in a Qualitative Study in the City of Buenos Aires.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9 (2): 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691000900203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelson, V., N. King, I. Janssen, S. Lawal, and W. Pickett. 2020. “Electronic Screen Technology Use and Connection to Nature in Canadian Adolescents: A Mixed Methods Study.” Canadian Journal of Public Health 111 (4): 502–514. https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-019-00289-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberwimmer, K., S. Vogtenhuber, L. Lassnigg, and C. Schreiner. 2019. Nationaler Bildungsbericht Österreich 2018, Band 1. Leykam: Das Schulsystem im Spiegel von Daten und Indikatoren.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, S., G. Evans, M. Moon, and F. Kaiser. 2019. “The Development of Children’s Environmental Attitude and Behavior.” Global Environmental Change 58: 101947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, S., and P. Pensini. 2017. “Nature-Based Environmental Education of Children: Environmental Knowledge and Connectedness to Nature, Together, Are Related to Ecological Behaviour.” Global Environmental Change 47: 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packard, J. 2008. “‘I’m Gonna Show You What It’s Really like out Here’: The Power and Limitation of Participatory Visual Methods.” Visual Studies 23 (1): 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860801908544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pany, P., F. D. Meier, B. Dünser, T. Yanagida, M. Kiehn, and A. Möller. 2022. “Measuring Students’ Plant Awareness: A Prerequisite for Effective Botany Education.” Journal of Biological Education: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2159491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsen, M. 2021. “16 From Late Holocene to Early Anthropocene Educational Thinking (Humanism Revisited).” In Rethinking Education in Light of Global Challenges: Scandinavian Perspectives on Culture, Society, and the Anthropocene, edited by Karen Bjerg Petersen, Kerstin von Brömssen, Gro Hellesdatter Jacobsen, Jesper Garsdal, Michael Paulsen, and Oleg Koefoed. Boca Raton, FL: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paulsen, M. 2023. “Outdoor Environmental Education in the Anthropocene: Beyond In/Out.” In Outdoor Environmental Education in the Contemporary World, edited by Jan Činčera, Bruce Johnson, Daphne Goldman, Iris Alkaher, and Michal Medek, 95–108. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, P. 2014. “Childrens’ Conceptions of Nature.” Australian Journal of Environmental Education 30 (1): 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2014.26
   Google Scholar
• Pergams, O., and P. Zaradic. 2007. “Videophilia: Implications for Childhood Development and Conservation.” Journal of Developmental Processes 2: 130–144.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. 1960. The Child Conception of the World. Littlefield: Adams [and] Company.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2007. Doing Visual Ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pisa, O. 2019. Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pointon, P. 2014. “The City Snuffs out Nature’: Young People’s Conceptions of and Relationship with Nature.” Environmental Education Research, 20 (6): 776–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.833595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponting, C. P. C. 2007. A New Green History of the World: The Environment and the Collapse of Great Civilizations. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Prins, E. 2010. “Participatory Photography: A Tool for Empowerment or Surveillance?” Action Research 8 (4): 426–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750310374502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullman, M. E., and S. K. Robson. 2007. “Visual Methods: Using Photographs to Capture Customers’ Experience with Design.” Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 48 (2): 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010880407300410
   Google Scholar
• Pyle, R. M. 1993. The Thunder Tree: Lessons from an Urban Wildland. Vol. 337. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, J. L., and A. D. Smith. 2012. “Using Photographs to Research Organizations: Evidence, Considerations, and Application in a Field Study.” Organizational Research Methods, 15 (2): 288–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428111431110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., H. A. Passmore, L. Barbett, R. Lumber, R. Thomas, and A. Hunt. 2020. “The Green Care Code: How Nature Connectedness and Simple Activities Help Explain Pro-Nature Conservation Behaviours.” People and Nature, 2 (3): 821–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10117
   Google Scholar
• Roczen, N., F. Kaiser, F. Bogner, and M. Wilson. 2013. “A Competence Model for Environmental Education.” Environment and Behavior 46 (8): 972–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513492416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. 2012. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. 2002. “Inclusion with Nature: The Psychology of Human-Nature Relations.” In Psychology of Sustainable Development, edited by P. Schmuck and W. P. Schultz, 61–78. Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_4
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, P., C. Shriver, J. Tabanico, and A. Khazian. 2004. “Implicit Connections with Nature.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 24 (1): 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W., and J. Tabanico. 2007. “Self, Identity, and the Natural Environment: exploring Implicit Connections with Nature 1.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 37 (6): 1219–1247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00210.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, J. 2015. ““Pics or It Didn’t Happen”–The Mantra of the Instagram Era: How Sharing Our Every Moment on Social Media Became the New Living.” In Terms of Service: Social Media and the Price of Constant Connection, 53–70. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöblom, P., and L.-A. Wolff. 2017. “It Wouldn’t Be the Same without Nature”—The Value of Nature according to Finnish Upper Secondary School Students.” The Journal of Environmental Education 48 (5): 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1367637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skilbeck, A. 2020. “‘A Thin Net over an Abyss’: Greta Thunberg and the Importance of Words in Addressing the Climate Crisis.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 54 (4): 960–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. A. 2002. “Place-Based Education: Learning to Be Where we Are.” Phi Delta Kappan, 83 (8): 584–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208300806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soga, M., and K. Gaston. 2016. “Extinction of Experience: The Loss of Human-Nature Interactions.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14 (2): 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stedman, R., T. Beckley, S. Wallace, and M. Ambard. 2004. “A Picture and 1000 Words: Using Resident-Employed Photography to Understand Attachment to High Amenity Places.” Journal of Leisure Research 36 (4): 580–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2004.11950037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen, Will, Katherine Richardson, Johan Rockström, Sarah E. Cornell, Ingo Fetzer, Elena M. Bennett, Reinette Biggs, et al. 2015. “Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet.” Science 347 (6223): 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strack, R. W., C. Magill, and K. McDonagh. 2004. “Engaging Youth through Photovoice.” Health Promotion Practice, 5 (1): 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839903258015
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tseng, Y-C., and, S.-M. Wang. 2020. “Understanding Taiwanese Adolescents’ Connections with Nature: rethinking Conventional Definitions and Scales for Environmental Education.” Environmental Education Research 26 (1): 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1668354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2015. “Global Action Programme on Education for Sustainable Development Information Folder.” https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246270
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Population Division. 2019. World Population Prospects 2019. New York: United Nations. https://population.un.org/wpp/publications/files/wpp2019_highlights.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vienna City Statistical Yearbook. 2020. Stadt Wien. https://www.viennabiocenter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/VBC/Career/Why_work_here/Life_in_Vienna/viennainfigures-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vining, J., M. S. Merrick, and E. A. Price. 2008. “The Distinction between Humans and Nature: Human Perceptions of Connectedness to Nature and Elements of the Natural and Unnatural.” Research in Human Ecology 15: 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., C. Ioannides, A. Dimitrakopoulou, and E. Papademetriou. 2001. “Designing Learning Environments to Promote Conceptual Change in Science.” Learning and Instruction 11 (4–5): 381–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00038-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S., and M. Cole. 1978. Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, H., and L. S. Loy. 2021. “What Drives Pro-Environmental Activism of Young People? A Survey Study on the Fridays for Future Movement.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 74: 101581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandersee, J. H., and E. E. Schussler. 1999. “Preventing Plant Blindness.” The American Biology Teacher 61 (2): 82–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/4450624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. C. 2006. “Youth Participation in Photovoice as a Strategy for Community Change.” Journal of Community Practice, 14 (1–2): 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v14n01_09
   Google Scholar
• Whitburn, J., W. Linklater, and W. Abrahamse. 2020. “Meta-Analysis of Human Connection to Nature and Proenvironmental Behavior.” Conservation Biology 34 (1): 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar