Expanding the ‘social’ in ‘social identity’

References

• Barnard, F. M. (1971). The “practical philosophy” of Christian Thomasius. Journal of the History of Ideas, 32(2), 221–46. doi: 10.2307/2708278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, F. M. (1988). Fraternity and citizenship: Two ethics of mutuality in Christian Thomasius. The Review of Politics, 50, 582–602. doi: 10.1017/S0034670500041966
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, A. (1998). From courtesy to civility: Changing codes of conduct in early modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, D. (1999). The disciplined citizen: Thomas Hobbes, neostoicism and the critique of classical citizenship. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 45(4), 506–524. doi: 10.1111/1467-8497.00078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, G., King, A., & Rettie, R. (Eds.). (2009). Sociological objects: Reconfigurations of social theory. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Donzelot, J. (1988). The promotion of society. Economy & Society, 17(3), 395–427. doi: 10.1080/03085148800000016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning, E., & Mennell, S. (Eds.). (2003). Norbert Elias: Sage masters of modern social thought (4 vols). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N. (1994 [1939]). The civilizing process: The history of manners and state formation and civilization, trans. E. Jephcott. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Epicurus. (1993). The essential Epicurus, trans., intro. E. O'Connor. New York: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Epicurus. (1994). The Epicurus reader, ed., trans. B. Inwood and L.P. Gerson, intro. D.S. Hutchinson. Indianapolis: Hacket Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power-knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon. Brighton: Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1981). Questions of method. I&C, 8, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. (2005). Outside ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1977). The passions and the interests: Political arguments for capitalism before its triumph. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T. (1845a). The english works of Thomas Hobbes of malmesbury, Volume II: Philosophical rudiments concerning government and society. London: John Bohn.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T. (1845b). The english works of Thomas Hobbes of malmesbury, Volume III: Leviathan: Or the matter, form, and power of a commonwealth, ecclesiastical and civil. London: John Bohn.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, S. (1988). Jean Bodin: The paradox of sovereignty and the privatization of religion. In J. R. Pennock, & J. W. Chapman (Eds.), Religion, morality, and the law (pp. 5–45). New York: New York University Press (Nomos XXX).
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, I. (2001). Rival enlightenments: Civil and metaphysical philosophy in early modern Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, I. (2007). The secularisation of the confessional state: The political thought of Christian Thomasius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. (1996). Social identity, first edition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. (2004). Social identity, second edition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. (2008). Hobbes on human nature and the necessity of manners. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 3(1), 67–76. doi: 10.1080/09697259808571965
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, P. (Ed.). (2002). The social in question: New bearings in history and the social sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, G., & Wickham, G. (1999). Using Foucault's methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Korkman, P. (2008). The vital string of mankind – sociability and the foundation of natural law and universal rights. In P. Korkman & V. Mäkinen (Eds.), Universalism in international law and political philosophy (pp. 5–34). Helsinki: Collegium.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsius, J. (2006 [1584]). De constantia, trans. J. Strandling, intro., notes J. Sellars. Bristol: Bristol Phoenix Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, I. (2014). War, what is it good for: The role of conflict in civilization, from primates to robots. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• OED Online Entry number 183776 (society). Retrieved June 19, 2015, from <http://0-www.oed.com.prospero.murdoch.edu.au/view/Entry/183776?redirectedFrom=society#eid>
   Google Scholar
• Oestreich, G. (1982). Neostoicism and the early modern state, ed. B. Oestreich and H.G. Koenigsberger, trans. D. McLintock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, T. & Rose, N. (1997). In the name of society. History of the Human Sciences, 10, 87–104. doi: 10.1177/095269519701000307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osler, M. J. (Ed.). (1991). Atoms, Pneuma, and Tranquility: Epicurean and stoic themes in European thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pocock, J. G. A. (2003). The machieavellian moment: Florentine political thought and the atlantic republican tradition, second edition, with a new afterword by the author. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pufendorf, S. (2002). On the nature and qualification of religion in reference to civil society, ed. S. Zurbuchen. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Pyyhtinen, O. (2009). Back to things themselves: On simmelian objects. In G. Cooper, A. King & R. Rettie (Eds.), Sociological objects: Reconfigurations of social theory (pp. 43–58). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Reydams-Schils, G. (2005). The roman stoics: Self, responsibility, and affection. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1996). The death of the social? Refiguring the territory of government. Economy & Society, 25(3), 327–356. doi: 10.1080/03085149600000018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, D. (1997). Anti-lawyers: Religion and the critics of law and state. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, D. (2002). “Within the orbit of this life” – Samuel pufendorf and the autonomy of law. Cardozo Law Review, 23(6), 2173–2198.
   Google Scholar
• Stern-Rubarth, E. (1946). A short history of the Germans (3rd ed.). London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, G., and Spencer, S. (Eds.). (2004). Social identities: Multidisciplinary approaches. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasius, C. (2007). Essays on church, state, and politics, ed., intro. I. Hunter, T. Ahnert, and F. Grunert. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S. P. (1994). The origins of “mainstream sociology” and other issues in the history of American sociology. Social Epistemology, 8(1), 41–67. doi: 10.1080/02691729408578729
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S. P. (2007). Merton's “norms” in political and intellectual context. Journal of Classical Sociology, 7(2), 161–178. doi: 10.1177/1468795X07078034
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S. P. (2014). Understanding the tacit. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, P. (1994). A sociology of modernity: Liberty and discipline. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, G. (Ed.). (2012). Sociology's object(s) and the discipline's relevance. Special Issue Journal of Sociology, 48(4).
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, G. (2014). Hobbes's commitment to society as a product of sovereignty: A basis for a Hobbesian sociology. Journal of Classical Sociology, 14(2), 139–155. doi: 10.1177/1468795X13491645
   Google Scholar
• Worchel, S., Morales, J. F., Páez, D., & Deschamps, J.-C. (Eds.). (1998). Social identity: International perspectives. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar