The neo-Nazi doxa, the deep state, and COVID-19: neo-Nazis’ ambivalent relations to Big Pharma and the anti-vaccine movement

References

• Avramov, K., Gatov, V., & Yablokov, I. (2020). Conspiracy theories and fake news. In M. Butler, & P. Knight (Eds.), Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories (pp. 512–526). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (1990). Modernity and ambivalence. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1978). Fascists: A social psychological view of the national front. Academic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A psychology of everyday thinking. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2018). Classification struggles. General sociology, volume 1. Lectures at Collège de France, 1981-82. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Butter, M., & Knight, P. (2020). Conspiracy theory in historical, cultural and literary studies. In M. Butler, & P. Knight (Eds.), Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories (pp. 28–42). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Byford, J. (2011). Conspiracy theories: A critical introduction. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (2014). The good research guide: For small-scale research projects (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2015). Climate change: Why the conspiracy theories are dangerous. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 71(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340215571908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., Ucsinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Advances in Political Psychology, 40(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, M. (2022). The great replacement: Strategic mainstreaming of far-right conspiracy claims. Convergence, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221091983
   Google Scholar
• Faccini, L., & Allely, C. S. (2016). Mass violence in individuals with autism spectrum disorder and narcissistic personality disorder: A case analysis of Anders Breivik using the “path to intended and terroristic violence” model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 31, 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. F., & Baumeister, R. F. (2019). The social psychology of gullibility: Fake news, conspiracy theories and irrational beliefs. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gøtzsche-Astrup, O., & Lindekilde, L. (2019). Either or? Reconciling findings in mental health and extremism using a dimensional paradigm. Journal of Forensic Science, 64(4), 982–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. (2012). Terrorist’s creed. Fanatical violence and human need for meaning. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (2002). The crippled epistemology of extremism. In A. Breton, G. Galeotti, P. Salmon, & R. Ronald (Eds.), Political extremism and rationality (pp. 3–22). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, S. Q. (2006). Rethinking subcultural capital. Young, 14(3), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308806065820
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, T., & Herz, M. (2019). Youth studies in transition. Culture, generation and new learning processes. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, B. C., Trimarco, J., LeClair, A., Pawson, M., Parsons, J. T., & Golub, S. A. (2015). Symbolic boundaries, subcultural capital and prescription drug misuse across youth cultures. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(3), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, P. (2000). Conspiracy culture: From the Kennedy assassination to the X-files. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B. (2020). Radicalisation and conspiracy theories. In M. Butler, & P. Knight (Eds.), Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories (pp. 344–356). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, M. (2008). Social and subcultural capital among teenagers in Northern Ireland. Youth & Society, 40(2), 224–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X08314243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lööw, H. (2004). Nazismen i Sverige 1924–1979. Ordfront.
   Google Scholar
• Mattsson, C., & Johansson, T. (2021). Life trajectories into and out of contemporary neo-nazism: Becoming and unbecoming the hateful other. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mattsson, C, & Johansson, T. (2022). Radicalization and disengagement in neo-nazi movements: Social psychological perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Radkiewicz, P. (2016). Does authoritarianism imply ethnocentric national attitudes: A revised look at the ‘authoritarian triad’ and right-wing ideology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration: A New theory of modernity. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. (2017). Good research practice. Swedish Research Council. https://www. vr.se/english/analysis/reports/our-reports/2017-08-31-good-research-practice.html
   Google Scholar
• Van Prooijen, J. W. (2018). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2006). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar