Valuation of patent – a real options perspective

References

• Black , F and Scholes , M . 1973 . The pricing of options and corporate liabilities . Journal of Political Economy , 81 : 637 – 59 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom , N and Reenen , JV . 2002 . Patents, real options and firm performance . The Economic Journal , 112 : 97 – 116 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brach , MA and Paxson , DA . 2001 . A gene to drug venture: Poisson options analysis . R&D Management , 31 : 203 – 14 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng , Z , Lev , B and Narin , F . 1999 . Science and technology as predictors of stock performance . Financial Analysts Journal , 55 : 20 – 32 .
   Google Scholar
• Ernst , H . 2001 . Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level . Research Policy , 30 : 143 – 57 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene , WH . 2003 . Econometric Analysis, , 5th , Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Grupp , H and Schmooh , U . 1999 . Patent statistics in the age of globalization: new legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation . Research Policy , 28 : 377 – 96 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall , BH , Jaffe , A and Trajtenberg , M . 2000 . Market value and patent citations: a first look, University of California at Berekeley . 2000 , Berkeley, CA. Department of Economics Working Paper No. 00-277 ,
   Google Scholar
• Howell , SD and Jagle , AJ . 1997 . Laboratory evidence on how managers intuitively value real growth options . Journal of Business Finance and Accounting , 24 : 915 – 35 .
   Google Scholar
• Laxman , PR and Aggarwal , S . 2003 . Patent valuation using real options . IIMB Management Review , 15 : 44 – 51 .
   Google Scholar
• Leahy , J and Whited , T . 1998 . The effects of uncertainty on investment: some stylized facts . Journal of Money Credit and Banking , 28 : 64 – 83 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers , SC . 1987 . Finance theory and financial strategy . Midland Corporate Finance Journal , 5 : 6 – 13 .
   Google Scholar
• Nichols , NA . 1994 . Scientific management at Merck: an interview with CFO Judy Lewent . Harvard Business Review , 72 : 89 – 99 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pindyck , RS and Rubinfeld , DL . 1998 . Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts, , 4th , New York : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Schankerman , M and Pake , A . 1986 . Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period . The Economic Journal , 96 : 1052 – 76 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenecker , T and Swanson , L . 2002 . Indicators of firm technological capability validity and performance implications . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 49 : 36 – 44 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz , ES . 2004 . Patents and R&D as real options . Economic Notes , 33 : 23 – 54 .
   Google Scholar
• Sherry , EF and Teece , DJ . 2004 . Royalties, evolving patent rights, and the value of innovation . Research Policy , 33 : 179 – 91 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas , P and McMillan , GS . 2001 . Using science and technology indicators to manage R&D as a business . Engineering Management Journal , 13 : 9 – 14 .
   Google Scholar
• Trigeorgis , L . 1993 . Real options and interactions with financial flexibility . Financial Management , 22 : 202 – 24 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe , C , Tsuji , YS and Griffy-Brown , C . 2001 . Patent statistics: deciphering a real versus a pseudo proxy of innovation . Technovation , 21 : 783 – 90 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar