References
- Andersson , O. and Wengström , E. 2007 . Do antitrust laws facilitate collusion? Experimental evidence on costly communication in duopolies . Scandinavian Journal of Economics , 109 : 321 – 39 .
- Bos , I. , Peeters , R. and Pot , E. 2012 . “ Competition versus collusion: the impact of consumer inertia ” . In Meteor Research Memorandum 12/046 , Maastricht : Maastricht University .
- Davies , S. and Olczak , M. 2008 . Tacit versus overt collusion. Firm asymmetries and numbers: What's the evidence?, CCP Working Paper No. 08-32, ESRC Centre for Competition Policy , Norfolk : University of East Anglia .
- Genesove , D. and Mullin , W. P. 2001 . Rules, communication and collusion: narrative evidence from the sugar institute case . American Economic Review , 91 : 379 – 98 .
- Harrington , J. E. and Skrzypacz , A. 2010 . Private monitoring and communication in cartels: explaining recent collusive practices . American Economic Review , 101 : 2425 – 49 .
- Klemperer , P. 1995 . Competition when consumers have switching costs: an overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics and international trade . Review of Economic Studies , 62 : 515 – 39 .
- Martin , S. 2006 . Competition policy, collusion and tacit collusion . International Journal of Industrial Organization , 24 : 1299 – 332 .
- McCutcheon , B. 1997 . Do meetings in smoke-filled rooms facilitate collusion? . Journal of Political Economy , 105 : 330 – 50 .
- Motta , M. 2004 . Competition Policy: Theory and Practice , New York : Cambridge University Press .
- Pot , E. , Flesch , J. Peeters , R. 2011 . Dynamic competition with consumer inertia, Meteor Research Memorandum 11/016 , Maastricht : Maastricht University .
- Whinston , M. D. 2006 . Lectures on Antitrust Economics , Cambridge , MA : MIT Press .