References
- Abdullah, S. and Mariel, P. (2010) Choice experiment study on the willingness to pay to improve electricity services, Energy Policy, 38, 4570–81.
- Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J. and Williams, M. (1994) Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 271–92.
- Akcura, E. (2013) Information effects on consumer willingness to pay for electricity and water service attributes, Working Paper No. 160, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, London.
- Baarsma, B. E. and Hop, J. P. (2009) Pricing power outages in the Netherlands, Energy, 34, 1378–86.
- Bosworth, R. and Taylor, L. (2012) Hypothetical bias in choice experiments: is cheap talk effective in eliminating hypothetical bias on the intensive and extensive margins of choice?, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 12, 1935–682.
- Carlsson, F. and Martinsson, P. (2008) Does it matter when a power outage occurs? A choice experiment study on the willingness to pay to avoid power outages, Energy Economics, 30, 1232–45.
- Ladenburg, J. (2013) Does gender-specific starting point bias in choice experiments prevail among well informed respondents: evidence from an empirical study, Applied Economics Letters, 20, 1527–30.
- Meyers-Levy, J. (1989) Gender differences in information processing: a selective interpretation, in Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising, Cafferata P. and Tybout, A. M. (Eds), Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, pp. 219–60.
- Nagl, S., Fursch, M. and Lindenberger, D. (2013) The costs of electricity systems with a high share of fluctuating renewables: a stochastic investment and dispatch optimization model for Europe, The Energy Journal, 34, 151–79.
- Train, K. (2003) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112440/MPU-Jenni-AI-ECONOMICS.png"})