Advanced search
Publication Cover
Applied Economics Letters Volume 23, 2016 - Issue 14
Submit an article Journal homepage
223
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Subject pool effects among the general population and students: a choice experiment example

James W. MjeldeDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USACorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Alicia A. Israel SchwarzloseTexas Association of School Boards, Risk Management Services, Austin, TX, USAView further author information
,
Rebekka M. DudensingDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Texas AgriLife Extension, College Station, TX, USAView further author information
,
Yanhong JinDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USAView further author information
,
Linda K. CherringtonTexas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX, USAView further author information
&
Junyi ChenDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USAView further author information
Pages 1018-1021 | Published online: 29 Dec 2015

References

  • Bennett, R., and R. Blaney. 2002. “Social Consensus, Moral Intensity and Willingness to Pay to Address a Farm Animal Welfare Issue.” Journal of Economic Psychology 23 (4): 501–520. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00098-3.
  • Cameron, T. 2005. “Individual Option Prices for Climate Change Mitigation.” Journal of Public Economics 89 (2–3): 283–301. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.01.005.
  • Corrigan, J.R., D. P. T. Depositario, R. M. Nayga Jr., X. Wu, and T. P. Laude. 2009. “Comparing Open-Ended Choice Experiments and Experimental Auctions: An Application to Golden Rice.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91 (3): 837–853. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01267.x.
  • Depositario, D.P.T., R.M. Nayga Jr., X. Wu, and T.P. Laude. 2009. “Should Students be Used as Subjects in Experimental Auctions?” Economics Letters 102 (2): 122–124. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2008.11.018.
  • Franco, D., D. Franco, I. Mannino, and G. Zanetto. 2001. “The Role of Agroforestry Networks in Landscape Socioeconomic Processes: The Potential and Limits of the Contingent Valuation Method.” Landscape and Urban Planning 55 (4): 239–256. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00158-X.
  • Gordon, M.E., L.A. Slade, and N. Schmitt. 1986. “The Science of the Sophomore Revisited: From Conjecture to Empiricism.” The Academy of Management Review 11 (1): 191–207.
  • Horowitz, J.K., and K.E. McConnell. 2002. “A Review of WTA/WTP Studies.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44 (3): 426–447. doi:10.1006/jeem.2001.1215.
  • Hsu, J.L., and C.W. Shiue. 2008. “Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Non-pirated Software.” Journal of Business Ethics 81: 715–732. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9543-9.
  • Hustvedt, G., and J.C. Bernard. 2010. “Effects of Social Responsibility Labelling and Brand on Willingness to Pay for Apparel.” International Journal of Consumer Studies 34 (6): 619–626. doi:10.1111/ijc.2010.34.issue-6.
  • Israel, A.A. 2012. “The Value of Public Transportation for Improving the Quality of Life for the Rural Elderly.” M.S. Thesis. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
  • Johansson-Stenman, O., and H. Svdesäter. 2012. “Self-image and Valuation of Moral Goods: Stated Versus Actual Willingness to Pay.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 84 (3): 879–891. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.10.006.
  • Maguire, K.G., L.O. Taylor, and S. Gurmu. 2003. “Do Students Behave Like Adults? Evidence from Valuation Experiments.” Applied Economic Letters 10 (12): 753–756. doi:10.1080/1350485032000138395.
  • Murphy, J.J., P.G. Allen, T.H. Stevens, and D. Weatherhead. 2005. “A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 30 (3): 313–325. doi:10.1007/s10640-004-3332-z.
  • Schläpfer, F., and B. Fischloff. 2012. “Task Familiarity and Contextual Cues Predict Hypothetical Bias in a Meta-analysis of Stated Preference Studies.” Ecological Economics 81: 44–47. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.06.016.
  • Train, K. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.