Prudence and prevention: an economic laboratory experiment

References

• Baltussen, G., T. Post, M. Van Den Assem, and P. P. Wakker. 2012. “Random Incentive Systems in a Dynamic Choice Experiment.” Experimental Economics 15 (3): 418–443. doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9306-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briys, E., and H. Schlesinger. 1990. “Risk Aversion and the Propensities for Self-Insurance and Self-Protection.” Southern Economic Journal 57 (2): 458–467. doi:10.2307/1060623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, G., and E. Coups. 1999. “Time Preferences and Preventive Health Behavior: Acceptance of the Influenza Vaccine.” Medical Decision Making 19: 307–314. doi:10.1177/0272989X9901900309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courbage, C., and B. Rey. 2006. “Prudence and Optimal Prevention for Health Risks.” Health Economics 15: 1323–1327. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crainich, D., L. Eeckhoudt, and C. Gollier. 2006. “Downside Risk Aversion and Prevention.” Working Paper presented at the Workshop on Health Economics at NHH, Bergen, Norway, November 23–24.
   Google Scholar
• Cubitt, R., R. Starmer, and R. Sugden. 1998. “On the Validity of the Random Lottery Incentive System.” Experimental Economics 1 (2): 115–131. doi:10.1023/A:1026435508449.
   Google Scholar
• Deck, C., and H. Schlesinger. 2010. “Exploring Higher Order Risk Effects.” The Review of Economic Studies 77 (4): 1403–1420. doi:10.1111/j.1467-937X.2010.00605.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deck, C., and H. Schlesinger. 2014. “Consistency of Higher Order Risk Preferences.” Econometrica 82 (5): 1913–1943. doi:10.3982/ECTA11396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dionne, G., and L. Eeckhoudt. 1985. “Self-Insurance, Self-Protection and Increased Risk Aversion.” Economics Letters 17: 39–42. doi:10.1016/0165-1765(85)90123-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebert, S., and D. Wiesen. 2011. “Testing for Prudence and Skewness Seeking.” Management Science 57 (7): 1334–1349. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebert, S., and D. Wiesen. 2014. “Joint Measurement of Risk Aversion, Prudence and Temperance.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 48 (3): 231–252. doi:10.1007/s11166-014-9193-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eeckhoudt, L. 2002. Risk and Medical Decision Making. Boston: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Eeckhoudt, L., and C. Gollier. 2005. “The Impact of Prudence on Optimal Prevention.” Economic Theory 26 (4): 989–994. doi:10.1007/s00199-004-0548-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eeckhoudt, L., C. Gollier, and H. Schlesinger. 1996. “Changes in Background Risk and Risk Taking Behavior.” Econometrica 64 (3): 683–689. doi:10.2307/2171866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eeckhoudt, L., C. Gollier, and T. Schneider. 1995. “Risk-Aversion, Prudence and Temperance: A Unified Approach.” Economics Letters 48: 331–336. doi:10.1016/0165-1765(94)00636-G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eeckhoudt, L., and H. Schlesinger. 2006. “Putting Risk in Its Proper Place.” American Economic Review 96 (1): 280–289. doi:10.1257/000282806776157777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, I., and G. Becker. 1972. “Market Insurance, Self-Insurance and Self-Protection.” Journal of Political Economy 80: 623–648. doi:10.1086/259916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischbacher, U. 2007. “Z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Readymade Economic Experiments.” Experimental Economics 10 (2): 171–178. doi:10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frechette, G. 2001a. “Sg158 – Random-Effects Ordered Probit.” Stata Technical Bulletin 59: 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Frechette, G. 2001b. “Sg158.1 – Update to Random-Effects Ordered Probit.” Stata Technical Bulletin 61: 12.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, A., and R. Peter. 2013. “Self-insurance, Self-protection and Increased Risk Aversion: An Intertemporal Reinvestigation.” Munich Risk and Insurance Center Working Paper 22.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, C. A., and S. K. Laury. 2002. “Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects.” American Economic Review 92 (5): 1644–1655. doi:10.1257/000282802762024700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2): 263–291. doi:10.2307/1914185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball, M. S. 1990. “Precautionary Saving in the Small and in the Large.” Econometrica 58 (1): 53–73. doi:10.2307/2938334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krämer, W., and G. Gigerenzer. 2005. “How to Confuse with Statistics Or: The Use and Misuse of Conditional Probabilities.” Statistical Science 20: 223–230. doi:10.1214/088342305000000296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger, M., and T. Mayrhofer. 2012. “Patient Preferences and Treatment Thresholds under Diagnostic Risk: An Economic Laboratory Experiment.” Ruhr Economics Papers No. 321.
   Google Scholar
• Laury, S. K. 2006. “Pay One or Pay All: Random Selection of One Choice for Payment.” Working Paper, Georgia State University.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, J., and M. Rüger. 2012. “Experimental Evidence on Higher-Order Risk Preferences with Real Monetary Losses.” Working Paper. https://sites.google.com/site/johanneskmaier/
   Google Scholar
• Menegatti, M. 2009. “Optimal Prevention and Prudence in a Two-Period Model.” Mathematical Social Sciences 58 (3): 393–397. doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2009.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menezes, C. F., C. Geiss, and J. Tressler. 1980. “Increasing Downside Risk.” American Economic Review 70: 921–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noussair, C. N., S. T. Trautmann, and G. Van De Kuilen. 2014. “Higher Order Risk Attitudes, Demographics, and Financial Decisions.” The Review of Economic Studies 81: 325–355. doi:10.1093/restud/rdt032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starmer, C., and R. Sugden. 1991. “Does the Random-Lottery Incentive System Elicit True Preferences? an Experimental Investigation.” American Economic Review 81 (4): 971–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar