References
- Ben-Ner, A., F. Kong, and L. Putterman. 2002. Share and Share Alike? Intelligence, Socialization, Personality, and Gender-Pairing as Determinants of Giving. Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota, HRRI Working Paper: 10-02.
- Booth, A. L., and P. Nolen. 2015. “Can Risk-Taking Preferences Be Modified? Some Experimental Evidence.” CESifo Economic Studies 61 (1): 7–32. doi:10.1093/cesifo/ifu018.
- Eckel, C., A. C. M. De Oliveira, and P. J. Grossman. 2008. “Gender and Negotiation in the Small: Are Women (Perceived to Be) More Cooperative than Men?” Negotiation Journal 24 (4): 429–445. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2008.00196.x.
- Eckel, C. C., and P. J. Grossman. 2001. “Chivalry and Solidarity in Ultimatum Games.” Economic Inquiry 39 (2): 171–188. doi:10.1111/ecin.2001.39.issue-2.
- Fischbacher, U. 2007. “Z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready-Made Economic Experiments.” Experimental Economics 10 (2): 171–178. doi:10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4.
- García-Gallego, A., N. Georgantzís, and A. Jaramillo-Gutiérrez. 2008. “Ultimatum Salary Bargaining with Real Effort.” Economics Letters 98 (1): 78–83. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2007.04.009.
- García-Gallego, A., N. Georgantzís, and A. Jaramillo-Gutiérrez. 2012. “Gender Differences in Ultimatum Games: Despite Rather than Due to Risk Attitudes.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 83 (1): 42–49. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.012.
- Meisenbach, R. J. 2010. “The Female Breadwinner: Phenomenological Experience and Gendered Identity in Work/Family Spaces.” Sex Roles 62 (1–2): 2–19. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9714-5.
- Solnick, S. J. 2001. “Gender Differences in the Ultimatum Game.” Economic Inquiry 39 (2): 189–200. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2001.tb00060.x.
- Sutter, M., R. Bosman, M. G. Kocher, and F. van Winden. 2009. “Gender Pairing and Bargaining—Beware the Same Sex!” Experimental Economics 12 (3): 318–331. doi:10.1007/s10683-009-9217-9.
- Winter, E., and S. Zamir. 2005. “An Experiment with Ultimatum Bargaining in a Changing Environment.” The Japanese Economic Review 56 (3): 363–385. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5876.2005.00329.x.