References
- American Bar Association Standing Committee on Legal Aid and Indigent Defendants. 2004. Gideon’s Broken Promise: American’s Continuing Quest for Equal Justice. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.
- Butcher, A., and M. Moore. 2000. Muting Gideon’s Trumpet: The Crisis in Criminal Defense in Texas. Austin, TX: Committee on Legal Services to the Poor in Criminal Matters.
- Cohen, T. 2014. “Who’s Better at Defending Criminals? Does Type of Defense Attorney Matter in Terms of Producing Favorable Case Outcomes.” Criminal Justice Policy Review 25: 29–58. doi:10.1177/0887403412461149.
- Gideon v. Wainwright. 372 US 335. 1963.
- Harlow, C. 2000. “Defense Counsel in Criminal Cases.” Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice.
- Iyengar, R. 2007. “An Analysis of the Performance of Federal Indigent Defense Counsel.” NBER Working Paper 13187.
- Katz, L. B. 1986. “Efficiency Wage Theories: A Partial Evaluation.” In NBER Macroeconomic Annual, edited by S. Fischer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Mustard, D. B. 2003. “Reexamining Criminal Behavior: The Importance of Omitted Variable Bias.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 85: 205—211.
- Roach, M. A. 2014. “Indigent Defense Counsel, Attorney Quality, and Defendant Outcomes.” American Law and Economics Review 16: 577—619.
- The Spangenberg Group. 2003. Rates of Compensation Paid to Court-Appointed Counsel in Non-Capital Felony Cases at Trial: A State-by-State Overview. West Newton, MA: The Spangenberg Group.
- The Spangenberg Group. 2006. Status of Indigent Defense in New York: A Study for Judge Kaye’s Commission on the Future of Indigent Defense Services. West Newton, MA: The Spangenberg Group.