References
- Boyle, Austin, (2013) “Homestead Portability: Equity and Tax Base Effects Of Florida's Amendment One,” Treatises and Dissertations, Paper 7304, The Florida State University.
- Dye, R., D. McMillen, and D. Merriman. 2006. “Illinois’ Response to Rising Residential Property Values: An Assessment Growth Cap in Cook County.” National Tax Journal 59: 707–716. doi:10.17310/ntj.2006.3.00.
- Ferreira, F. 2010. “You Can Take It with You: Proposition 13 Tax Benefits, Residential Mobility, and Willingness to Pay for Housing Amenities.” Journal of Public Economics 94 (9–10): 661–673. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.04.003.
- Fleissig, A. 2016. “Economic Impacts of a Property Assessment Portability Law.” Center for California Studies Sacramento 1–28.
- Hodge, T. R., M. Skidmore, G. Sands, and D. McMillen. 2015. “Tax Base Erosion and Inequity from Michigan’s Assessment Growth Limit: The Case of Detroit.” Public Finance Review 43 (5): 636–660. doi:10.1177/1091142114537675.
- Koenker, R. 2005. Quantile Regression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Miller, N., and M. Sklarz. 2016. “A Note on the Impact of Prop 13 on Effective Tax Rates, Turnover, and Home Prices.” Journal of Housing Research 25 (2): 213–223.
- O’Sullivan, A., T. Sexton, and S. Sheffrin. 1994. “Differential Burdens from the Assessment Provisions of Proposition 13.” National Tax Journal, 47:721–729.
- O’Sullivan, A., T. Sexton, and S. Sheffrin. 1995a. Property Taxes and Tax Revolts: The Legacy of Proposition 13. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- O’Sullivan, A., T. Sexton, and S. M. Sheffrin. 1995b. “Property Taxes, Mobility, and Home Ownership.” Journal of Urban Economics 37 (1): 107–129. doi:10.1006/juec.1995.1007.
- Portnoy, S., and R. Koenker. 1997. “The Gaussian Hare And The Laplacian Tortoise: Computability Of Squared-error Versus Absolute-error Estimators.” Statistical Science 12 (4): 279-300.
- Sexton, T., S. Sheffrin, and A. O’Sullivan. 1999. “Proposition 13: Unintended Effects and Feasible Reforms.” National Tax Journal, 1: 99–111.