Is there any evidence of tax-and-spend, spend-and-tax or fiscal synchronization from panel of Indian state?

References

• Baharumshah, A. Z., and S. V. Soon. 2012. “Mean Reversion in Bilateral Real Exchange Rates: Evidence from the Malaysian Ringgit.” Applied Economics 44 (22): 2921–2933. doi:10.1080/00036846.2011.568406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caner, M., and L. Kilian. 2001. “Size Distortions of Tests of the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity: Evidence and Implications for the PPP Debate.” Journal of International Money and Finance 20: 639–657. doi:10.1016/S0261-5606(01)00011-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, T. W., R. Liu, and S. B. Caudill. 2002. “Tax-and-Spend, Spend-and-Tax, or Fiscal Synchronization: New Evidence for Ten Countries.” Applied Economics 34: 1553–1561. doi:10.1080/00036840110103265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumitrescu, I. E., and C. Hurlin. 2012. “Testing for Granger Non-Causality in Heterogeneous Panels.” Economic Modelling 29: 1450–1460. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1978. “The Limitations of Tax Limitations.” Policy Review 5: 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Holtz-Eakin, D., W. Newey, and H. Rosen. 1989. “The Revenues-Expenditures Nexus: Evidence from Local Government Data.” International Economic Review 30: 415–429. doi:10.2307/2526655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M. Q. 2001. “Structural Break, Unit Root, and the Causality between Government Expenditures and Revenues.” Applied Economics Letters 8: 565–567. doi:10.1080/13504850010018266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E., and A. Z. Baharumshah. 2009. “Assessing the Mean Reversion Behaviour of Fiscal Policy: The Perspective of Asian Countries.” Applied Economics 41: 1939–1949. doi:10.1080/00036840601131755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and M. Strazicich. 2003. “Minimum Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks.” Review of Economics and Statistics 85: 1082–1089. doi:10.1162/003465303772815961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. 2001. “Government Revenue, Government Expenditure, and Temporal Causality: Evidence from China.” Applied Economics 33: 485–497. doi:10.1080/00036840122982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumsdaine, R., and D. Papell. 1997. “Multiple Trend Break and the Unit Root Hypothesis.” Review of Economics and Statistics 79: 212–218. doi:10.1162/003465397556791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. 1966. “Principles of Budget Determination, in Public Finance.” In Selected Readings, edited by A. H. Cameron and W. Henderson, 15–27. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, P. K. 2005. “The Government Revenue and Government Expenditure Nexus: Empirical Evidence from Nine Asian Countries.” Journal of Asian Economics 15: 1203–1216. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2004.11.007.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, P. K., and S. Narayan. 2006. “Government Revenue and Government Expenditure Nexus: Evidence from Developing Countries.” Applied Economics 38: 285–291. doi:10.1080/00036840500369209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, P. K., and S. Popp. 2010. “A New Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks in Level and Slope at Unknown Time.” Journal of Applied Statistics 37: 1425–1438. doi:10.1080/02664760903039883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, P. K., and S. Popp. 2013. “Size and Power Properties of Structural Break Unit Root Tests.” Applied Economics 45: 721–728. doi:10.1080/00036846.2011.610752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, S., B. N. Rath, and P. K. Narayan. 2012. “Evidence of Wagner’s Law from Indian States.” Economic Modelling 29: 1548–1557. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2012.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owoye, O. 1995. “The Causal Relationship between Taxes and Expenditure in the G7 Countries: Cointegration and Error-Correction Models.” Applied Economic Letters 2: 19–22. doi:10.1080/135048595357744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paleologou, S. M. 2013. “Asymmetries in the Revenue–Expenditure Nexus: A Tale of Three Countries.” Economic Modelling 30: 52–60. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2012.09.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J. E. 2003. “A Survey of the International Empirical Evidence on the Tax-Spend Debate.” Public Finance Review 31: 302–324. doi:10.1177/1091142103031003005.
   Google Scholar
• Peacock, A. T., and J. Wiseman. 1961. The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. 2004. “General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels.” CESifo working paper series no. 1229.
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. 2007. “A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 22: 265–312. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ram, R. 1988. “Additional Evidence on Causality between Government-Revenue and Government-Expenditure.” Southern Economic Journal 54: 763–769. doi:10.2307/1059018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunoris, J. W., and J. E. Payne. 2010. “Tax More or Spend Less? Asymmetries in the UK Revenue–Expenditure Nexus.” Journal of Policy Modeling 32: 478–487. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerlund, J., S. Mahdavi, and F. Firoozi. 2011. “The Tax-Spending Nexus: Evidence from a Panel of US State–Local Governments.” Economic Modelling 28: 885–890. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2010.10.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar