Geographical distance puzzle in patent citations: intensive versus extensive margins

References

• Agrawal, A., and A. Goldfarb. 2008. “Restructuring Research: Communication Costs and the Democratization of University Innovation.” American Economic Review 98 (4): 1578–1590. doi:10.1257/aer.98.4.1578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A., D. Kapur, and J. McHale. 2008. “How Do Spatial and Social Proximity Influence Knowledge Flows? Evidence from Patent Data.” Journal of Urban Economics 64 (2): 258–269. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2008.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, P., and B. Kogut. 1999. “Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks.” Management Science 45 (7): 905–917. doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchiocchi, E., and F. Montobbio. 2010. “International Knowledge Diffusion and Home-bias Effect. Do USPTO & EPO Patent Citations Tell the Same Story?” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 112 (3): 441–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartelsman, E. J., M. Falk, E. Hagsten, and M. Polder. 2019. “Productivity, Technological Innovations and Broadband Connectivity: Firm-level Evidence for Ten European Countries.” Eurasian Business Review 9: 25. doi:10.1007/s40821-018-0113-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., and F. Lissoni. 2009. “Mobility of Skilled Workers and Co-invention Networks: An Anatomy of Localized Knowledge Flows.” Journal of Economic Geography 9 (4): 439–468. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelli, R., and F. Montobbio. 2016. “European Integration and Knowledge Flows across European Regions.” Regional Studies 50: 709–727. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.931572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffano, M., and G. Tarasconi (2014). “Crios Innos&T Database: Sources, Contents and Access Rules.” CRIOS working paper N.1, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2404344:
   Google Scholar
• Corsino, M., M. Mariani, and S. Torrisi. 2019. “Firm Strategic Behavior and the Measurement of Knowledge Flows with Patent Citations.” Strategic Management Journal 40 (7): 1040–1069. doi:10.1002/smj.3016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, J. P. J., and M. Freel. 2010. “Absorptive Capacity and the Reach of Collaboration in High Technology Small Firms.” Research Policy 39 (1): pages 47–54. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EUROSTAT. 2007. Regions in the European Union.Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics: 1-157. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Gaspar, J., and E. J. Glaeser. 1998. “Information Technology and the Future of Cities.” Journal of Urban Economics 43 (1): 136–156. doi:10.1006/juec.1996.2031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1969. The Economies of Cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. 1986. “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits, and Market Value.” American Economic Review 76: 984–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., and G. de Rassenfosse. 2017. “Patent Citation Data in Social Science Research: Overview and Best Practices.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68 (6): 1360–1374. doi:10.1002/asi.2017.68.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson. 1993. “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 577–598. doi:10.2307/2118401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. A. 2014. “Borders and Distance in Knowledge Spillovers: Dying over Time or Dying with age?—Evidence from Patent Citations.” European Economic Review, Elsevier. 71 (C): 152–172. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.07.005.
   Google Scholar
• Maurseth, P. B., and B. Verspagen. 2002. “Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: A Patent Citations Analysis.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 104: 531–545. doi:10.1111/sjoe.2002.104.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peri, G. 2005. “Determinants of Knowledge Flows and Their Effect on Innovation.” Review of Economics and Statistics 87: 308–322. doi:10.1162/0034653053970258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf, L., and P. Almeida. 2003. “Overcoming Local Search through Alliances and Mobility.” Management Science 49 (6): 751–766. doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.6.751.16026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos Silva, J. M. C., and S. Tenreyro. 2006. “The Log of Gravity.” Review of Economics and Statistics 88: 641–658. doi:10.1162/rest.88.4.641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos Silva, J. M. C., and S. Tenreyro. 2011. “Further Simulation Evidence on the Performance of the Poisson Pseudo-maximum Likelihood Estimator.” Economics Letters 112: 220–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson, O., J. W. Rivkin, and L. Fleming. 2006. “Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow.” Research Policy, Elsevier. 35 (7): 994–1017. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P., and M. Fox-Kean. 2005. “Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: A Reassessment.” The American Economic Review 95 (1): 450–460. doi:10.1257/0002828053828509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar