The relationship between concealed carry permits and state-level crime rates

References

• Aneja, A., J. Donohue, and A. Zhang. 2011. “The Impact of Right-to-Carry Laws and the NRC Report: Lessons for the Empirical Evaluation of Law and Policy.” American Law and Economics Review 13 (2): 565–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayers, I., and J. Donohue. 2003. “Shooting down the More Guns, Less Crime Hypothesis.” Stanford Law Review 55: 1193–1314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barati, M. 2016. “New Evidence on the Impact of Concealed Carry Weapon Laws on Crime.” International Review of Law and Economics 47: 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.irle.2016.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartley, W., and M. Cohen. 1998. “The Effect of Concealed Weapons Laws: An Extreme Bound Analysis.” Economic Inquiry 36: 258–265. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01711.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, J., and M. Binder. 2018. “Firearm Violence and Effects on Concealed Gun Carrying: Large Debate and Small Effects.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 33 (19): 3025–3052. doi:10.1177/0886260516633608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devaraj, S., and P. Patel. 2018. “An Examination of the Effects of 2014 Concealed Weapons Law in Illinois on Property Crimes in Chicago.” Applied Economics Letters 25 (16): 1125–1129. doi:10.1080/13504851.2017.1400645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donohue, J. 2003. “The Impact of Concealed-Carry Laws.” In Evaluating Gun Policy: Effects on Crime and Violence, edited by J. Ludwig and P. Cook, 287–341. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, M. 2001. “More Guns, More Crime.” Journal of Political Economy 109 (5): 1086–1114. doi:10.1086/322833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginwalla, R., P. Rhee, R. Friese, D. Green, L. Gries, B. Joseph, N. Kulvatunyou, et al. 2013. “Repeal of the Concealed Weapons Law and Its Impact on Gun-Related Injuries and Deaths.” Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 76 (3): 569–575. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000000141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gius, M. 2014. “An Examination of the Effects of Concealed Weapons Laws and Assault Weapons Bans on State-Level Murder Rates.” Applied Economics Letters 21 (4): 265–267. doi:10.1080/13504851.2013.854294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gius, M. 2019. “Using the Synthetic Control Method to Determine the Effects of Concealed Carry Laws on State-Level Murder Rates.” International Review of Law & Economics 57: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.irle.2018.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovandzic, T., and T. Marvell. 2003. “Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns and Violent Crime: Crime Control through Gun Decontrol?” Criminology and Public Policy 2 (3): 363–396. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2003.tb00002.x.
   Google Scholar
• Lott, J. 2000. More Guns, Less Crime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lott, Jr., J., and D. Mustard. 1997. “Crime, Deterrence, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns.” The Journal of Legal Studies 26 (1): 1–68. doi:10.1086/467988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, J. 1998. “’concealed-gun-carrying Laws and Violent Crime: Evidence from State Panel Data.” International Review of Law and Economics 18 (3): 239–254. doi:10.1016/S0144-8188(98)00012-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, C. 2001. “Testing for the Effects of Concealed Weapons Laws: Specification Errors and Robustness.” Journal of Law and Economics 44 (S2): 799–813. doi:10.1086/323313.
   Google Scholar
• Moody, C., and T. Marvell. 2009. “The Debate on Shall Issue Laws, Continued.” Econ Journal Watch 6 (2): 203–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, D., and M. Maltz. 2001. “Right-to-Carry Concealed Weapon Laws and Homicide in Large U.S. Counties: The Effect on Weapon Types, Victim Characteristics, and Victim-Offender Relationships.” Journal of Law and Economics 44 (S2): 747–770. doi:10.1086/338345.
   Google Scholar
• Plassmann, F., and T. Nicolaus Tideman. 2001. “Does the Right to Carry Concealed Handguns Deter Countable Crimes? Only a Count Analysis Can Say.” Journal of Law and Economics 44 (2): 771–798. doi:10.1086/323311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar