Firms’ performance and board size: A simultaneous approach in the European and American contexts

References

• Boone, A. L., L. C. Field, J. M. Karpoff, and C. J. Raheja. 2007. “The Determinants of Corporate Board Size and Composition: an Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics 85: 66–101. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S. J., C. Y. Chung, and J. Young. 2019. “Study on the Relationship between CSR and Financial Performance.” Sustainability 11. doi:10.3390/su11020343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, J. L., N. D. Daniel, and L. Naveen. 2008. “Boards: Does One Size Fit All?” Journal of Financial Economics 87: 329–356. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, H., and Y. T. Mak. 2002. “The Relationship between Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance in High R&D Firms.” Journal of Corporate Finance 8: 313–336. doi:10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00047-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, D. R., C. M. Daily, A. E. Ellstrand, and J. L. Johnson. 1998. “Meta-analytic Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure, and Financial Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 19: 269–290. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Andres, P., V. Azofra, and F. Lopez. 2005. “Corporate Boards in OECD Countries: Size, Composition, Functioning and Effectiveness.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 13: 197–210. doi:10.1111/corg.2005.13.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drakos, A. A., and F. V. Bekiris. 2010. “Endogeneity and the Relationship between Board Structure and Firm Performance: A Simultaneous Equation Analysis for the Athens Stock Exchange.” Managerial and Decision Economics 31: 387–401. doi:10.1002/mde.1492.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, S. P., and M. Jagannathan. 2001. “The Incidence and Determinants of Multiple Corporate Directorships.” Applied Economics Letters 8: 31–35. doi:10.1080/135048501750041259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, N. J. 1997. “Austrian Insights and Theory Of The Firm.” InAdvances in Austrian Economics, 175–198, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi:10.1016/S1529-2134(97)04014-3
   Google Scholar
• Gennaioli, N., Y. Ma, and A. Shleifer. 2016. “Expectations and Investment.” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 30: 379–431. doi:10.1086/685965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S. 2006. “Do Board Characteristics Affect Corporate Performance? Firm-level Evidence for India.” Applied Economics Letters 13: 435–443. doi:10.1080/13504850500398617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., and T. Dalziel. 2003. “Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives.” Academy of Management Review 28: 383–396. doi:10.5465/amr.2003.10196729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackling, B., and S. Johl. 2009. “Board Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from India’s Top Companies.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 17: 492–509. doi:10.1111/corg.2009.17.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahadeo, J. D., T. Soobaroyen, and V. O. Hanuma. 2012. “Board Composition and Financial Performance: Uncovering the Effects of Diversity in an Emerging Economy.” Journal of Business Ethics 105: 375–388. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0973-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maury, B. 2006. “Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Western European Corporations.” Journal of Corporate Finance 12: 321–341. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, B. S. 2018. “Determinants of Board Size in an Emerging Market.” Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting 29: 5–29. doi:10.1111/jifm.12066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vafeas, N., and E. Theodorou. 1998. “The Relationship between Board Structure and Firm Performance in the UK.” The British Accounting Review 30: 383–407. doi:10.1006/bare.1998.0075.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2013. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. fifth ed. Mason: South-Western, Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar