Sovereign indebtedness and financial and fiscal conditions

References

• Afonso, A. 2008. “Ricardian Fiscal Regimes in the European Union.” Empirica 35 (3): 313–334. doi:10.1007/s10663-008-9066-3.
   Google Scholar
• Arellano, M., and O. Bover. 1995. “Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error Component Models.” Journal of Econometrics 68: 29–51. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, R., S. Danninger, S. Elekdag, and I. Tytell. 2009. “The Transmission of Financial Stress from Advanced to Emerging Economies.” IMF Working Paper WP/09/133. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund (IMF).
   Google Scholar
• Ballabriga, F., and C. Martinez-Mongay. 2005. “Sustainability of EU Public Finances.” Economic Papers No 225, April. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Bellas, D., M. Papaionannou, and I. Petrova. 2010. “Determinants of Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond Spreads: Fundamentals Vs Financial Stress.” IMF WP series No. 10/281.
   Google Scholar
• Bohn, H. 2008. “The Sustainability of Fiscal Policy in the United States.” In Sustainability of Public Debt, edited by R. Neck and J.-E. Sturm. Cambridge, Massachussets: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borio, C., P. Disyatat, and M. Juselius. 2013. “Rethinking Potential Output: Embedding Information about the Financial Cycle.” BIS Working Papers, n.404.
   Google Scholar
• Canzoneri, M., R. Cumby, and B. Diba. 2001. “Is the Price Level Determined by the Needs of Fiscal Solvency?” American Economic Review 91 (5): 1221–1238. doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dailami, M., P. Masson, and J. Padou. 2008. “Global Monetary Conditions versus Country-Specific Factors in the Determination of Emerging Market Debt Spreads.” Journal of International Money and Finance 27 (8): 1325–1336. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2008.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, J., and A. Kraay. 1998. “Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data.” Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (4): 549–560. doi:10.1162/003465398557825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhard, M., and F. Teal. 2011. “Econometrics for Grumblers: A New Look at the Literature on Cross-country Growth Empirics.” Journal of Economic Surveys 25 (1): 109–155. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00624.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebner, A. 2009. “An Empirical Analysis on the Determinants of CEE Government Bond Spreads.” Emerging Markets Review 10: 97–121. doi:10.1016/j.ememar.2009.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, K. S., M. H. Pesaran, and Y. Shin. 1997. Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. Mimeo Cambridge University. Lee, K., M. H. Pesaran, and R. Smith. 1997. “Growth and convergence in a multi-country empirical stochastic Solow model.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 12: 357–392.
   Google Scholar
• IMF. 2018. “Capitalizing on Good Times.” IMF Fiscal Monitor, April. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Leeper, E. 1991. “Equilibria under ‘active’ and ‘passive’ Monetary and Fiscal Policies.” Journal of Monetary Economics 27 (1): 129–147. doi:10.1016/0304-3932(91)90007-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. 2006. “Estimation and Inference in Large Heterogeneous Panels with a Multifactor Error Structure.” Econometrica 74 (4): 967–1012. doi:10.1111/ecta.2006.74.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. 2007. “A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross-section Dependence.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 22: 265–312. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H., and R. Smith. 1995. “The Role of Theory in Econometrics.” Journal of Econometrics 67 (1): 61–79. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01627-C.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, C. A. 1994. A Simple Model for Study of the Determination of the Price Level and The Interaction of Monetary and Fiscal Policy, Economic Theory 4:381– 99.
   Google Scholar
• Woodford, M. 1995. “Price Level Determinacy without Control of a Monetary Aggregate,” Carnegie-rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 43, 1–46.
   Google Scholar