https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8626-1508
References
- Anelli, M., and G. Peri. 2019. “The Effects of High School Peers’ Gender on College Major, College Performance and Income.” The Economic Journal. 129(618):553–602. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12556
- Angrist, J. D. 2014. “The Perils of Peer Effects.” Labour Economics. 30:98–108. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2014.05.008
- Brenoe, A. A., and U. Zölitz. forthcoming. “Exposure to More Female Peers Widens the Gender Gap in STEM Participation.” Journal of Labor Economics.
- Carlana, M. 2019. “Implicit Stereotypes: Evidence from Teachers’ Gender Bias.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 134(3):1163–1224. doi:10.1093/qje/qjz008
- Cools, A., R. Fernández, and E. Patacchini. 2019. Girls, Boys, and High Achievers. NBER Working Paper 25763. doi: 10.3386/w25763
- Favara, M. 2012. “The Cost of Acting “Girly”: Gender Stereotypes and Educational Choices.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 7037.
- Morando, G. 2020. The Effect of Studying Mathematics on Major Choice. Mimeo.
- Murphy, R., and F. Weinhardt. forthcoming. “Top of the Class: The Importance of Ordinal Rank.” Review of Economic Studies.
- The Royal Society. 2007. The UK’s Science and Mathematics Teaching Workforce. The Royal Society, London.