References
- Crozet, M. 2004. “Do Migrants Follow Market Potentials? an Estimation of a New Economic Geography Model.” Journal of Economic Geography 4 (4): 439–458. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlecg/lbh029.
- Hanson, G. H. 2005. “Market Potential, Increasing Returns and Geographic Concentration.” Journal of International Economics 67 (1): 1–24.
- Harris, C. D. 1954. “The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 44 (4): 315–348.
- Head, K., and T. Mayer. 2000. “Non-Europe: The Magnitude and Causes of Market Fragmentation in the EU.” Review of World Economics 136: 284–314.
- Head, K., and T. Mayer. 2011. “Gravity, Market Potential and Economic Development.” Journal of Economic Geography 11 (2): 281–294.
- Karahasan, B. C., and F. Bilgel. 2020. “Market Access and Regional Dispersion of Human Capital Accumulation in Turkey.” Review of Development Economics 24 (3): 1073–1101.
- Karahasan, B. C., F. Dogruel, and S. Dogruel. 2016. “Can Market Potential Explain Regional Disparities in Developing Countries? Evidence from Turkey.” The Developing Economies 54 (2): 162–197.
- Keeble, D., P. L. Owens, and C. Thompson. 1982. “Regional Accessibility and Economic Potential in the European Community.” Regional Studies 16 (6): 419–432.
- Krugman, P. 1991. “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography.” Journal of Political Economy 99 (3): 483–499.
- Lopez-Rodriguez, J. 2007. “Is Market Potential Robust in Explaining Regional Educational Levels in Europe?” Applied Economics Letters 14 (7): 489–492.
- Lopez-Rodriguez, J., and A. Faiña. 2006. “Does Distance Matter for Determining Regional Income in the European Union? an Approach through the Market Potential Concept.” Applied Economics Letters 13 (6): 385–390.
- Lopez-Rodriguez, J., A. Faiña, and J. Lopez Rodriguez. 2007. “Human Capital Accumulation and Geography: Empirical Evidence from the European Union.” Regional Studies 41 (2): 217–234.
- Nitsch, V. 2000. “National Borders and International Trade: Evidence from the European Union.” Canadian Journal of Economics 22: 091–1105.