355
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Sticky cost theory and firm’s evolution

&

References

  • Anderson, M. C., R. D. Banker, and S. Janakiraman. 2003. “Are Selling, General and Administrative Cost “Sticky”?” Journal of Accounting Research 41: 47–63. doi:10.1111/1475-679X.00095.
  • Balios, D., N. Eriotis, V. C. Naoum, and D. Vasiliou. 2020. “How Earnings Management Drive the Sticky Behavior of Selling General and Administrative Costs; an International Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 12: 242. (forthcoming). doi:10.1504/IJMFA.2020.112336.
  • Ballas, A., V. C. Naoum, and O. Vlismas. 2020. “The Effect of Strategy on Asymmetric Cost Behavior of SG&A Expenses.” European Accounting Review 1–39. (forthcoming). doi:10.1080/09638180.2020.1813601.
  • Banker, D., and D. Byzalov. 2014. “Asymmetric Cost Behavior.” Journal of Management Accounting Research 25 (2): 43–79. doi:10.2308/jmar-50846.
  • Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., & Plehn-Dujowich, J. M. (2014). Demand uncertainty and cost behavior. The Accounting Review, 89(3): 839–865. doi:10.2308/accr-50661
  • Chen, C. X., H. Lu, and T. Sougiannis. 2012. “The Agency Problem, Corporate Governance, and the Asymmetrical Behavior of Selling, General, and Administrative Costs.” Contemporary Accounting Research 29: 252–282. doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01094.x.
  • Davila, A., and G. Foster. 2007. “Management Control Systems in Early-stage Startup Companies.” The Accounting Review 82 (4): 907–937. doi:10.2308/accr.2007.82.4.907.
  • Dickinson, V. 2011. “Cash Flow Patterns as a Proxy for Firm Life Cycle.” The Accounting Review 86 (6): 1969–1994. doi:10.2308/accr-10130.
  • Dierynck, B., W. R. Landsman, and A. Renders. 2012. “Do Managerial Incentives Drive Cost Behavior? Evidence about the Role of the Zero Earnings Benchmark for Labor Cost Behavior in Private Belgian Firms.” The Accounting Review 87 (4): 1219–1246. doi:10.2308/accr-50153.
  • Guo, F., S. Gan, W. Yang, and P. Kuang. 2020. “Are Sales and Taxes ‘Sticky’? Empirical Evidence of the Impact of Tax Enforcement on Tax Revenue Growth in China.” Applied Economics Letters 28 (8): 663 –667. doi: 10.1080/13504851.2020.1770675.
  • Holzhacker, M., R. Krishnan, and M. D. Mahlendorf. 2015. “Unraveling the Black Box of Cost Behavior: An Empirical Investigation of Risk Drivers, Managerial Resource Procurement, and Cost Elasticity.” The Accounting Review 90 (6): 2305–2335. doi:10.2308/accr-51092.
  • Hribar, P., and N. Yehuda. 2015. “The Mispricing of Cash Flows and Accruals at Different Life‐cycle Stages.” Contemporary Accounting Research 32 (3): 1053–1072. doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12117.
  • Jenkins, D. S., G. D. Kane, and U. Velury. 2004. “The Impact of the Corporate Life-cycle on the Value-relevance of Disaggregated Earnings Components.” Review of Accounting and Finance 3 (4): 5–20. doi:10.1108/eb043411.
  • Jensen, M. C. 1986. “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers.” The American Economic Review 76 (2): 323–329.
  • Kallunki, J. P., and H. Silvola. 2008. “The Effect of Organizational Life Cycle Stage on the Use of Activity-based Costing.” Management Accounting Research 19 (1): 62–79. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2007.08.002.
  • Lee, J. H. 2018. “Empirical Analysis of Asymmetric Cost Behavior.” Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Calgary.
  • Li, Z., Q. Ying, Y. Chen, and X. Zhang. 2020. “Managerial Risk Appetite and Asymmetry Cost Behavior: Evidence from China.” Accounting & Finance 60 (5): 4651–4692. doi:10.1111/acfi.12692.
  • Silge, L., and A. Wöhrmann. 2019. “Market Reaction to Asymmetric Cost Behavior: The Impact of Long-term Growth Expectations.” Review of Managerial Science15 (2): 309 - 347. doi: 10.1007/s11846-019-00341-8.
  • Spence, A. M. 1977. “Entry, Capacity, Investment and Oligopolistic Pricing.” The Bell Journal of Economics 8: 534–544. doi:10.2307/3003302.
  • Venieris, G., V. C. Naoum, and O. Vlismas. 2015. “Organisation Capital and Sticky Behavior of Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.” Management Accounting Research 26 (1): 54–82. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2014.10.003.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.