Leadership structure and firm performance: evidence from China

References

• Andrews, K. R. 1971. The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Arena, M. P., S. P. Ferris, and E. Unlu. 2011. “It Takes Two: The Incidence and Effectiveness of Co-CEOs.” Financial Review 46 (3): 385–412. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6288.2011.00305.x.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, C. 1938. The Functions of the Executive. Gambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brickley, J. A., J. L. Coles, and G. Jarrell. 1997. “Leadership Structure: Separating the CEO and Chairman of the Board.” Journal of Corporate Finance 3: 189–220.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, J. B., P. E. Tesluk, and J. A. Marrone. 2007. “Shared Leadership in Teams: An Investigation of Antecedent Conditions and Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (5): 1217–1234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castañer, X., and N. Kavadis. 2013. “Does Good Governance Prevent Bad Strategy? A Study of Corporate Governance, Financial Diversification, and Value Creation by French Corporations, 2000–2006.” Strategic Management Journal 34 (7): 863–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, K., J. Lee, and H. Shim. 2019. “CEO Duality and Firm Performance: Does Economic Policy Uncertainty Mediate the Relation?” International Review of Finance 19 (4): 877–899.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, J. F., C. L. Pearce, and M. L. Perry. 2003. “Toward a Model of Shared Leadership and Distributed Influence in the Innovation Process: How Shared Leadership Can Enhance New Product Development Team Dynamics and Effectiveness.” In Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership, 48–76. California, US: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L., and J. H. Davis. 1991. “Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns.” Australian Journal of Management 16 (1): 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Döös, M., and L. Wilhelmson. 2021. “Fifty-Five Years of Managerial Shared Leadership Research: A Review of an Empirical Field.” Leadership 17 (6): 715–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayol, H. 1949. General and Industrial Management. London, UK: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S. 1992. “Power in Top Management Teams: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation.” Academy of Management Journal 35 (3): 505–538. doi:10.5465/256485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., and R. D’Aveni. 1994. “CEO Duality as a Double-Edged Sword: How Boards of Directors Balance Entrenchment Avoidance and Unity of Command.” Academy of Management Journal 37: 1079–1108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasija, D. B., A. E. Ellstrand, D. L. Worrell, and H. D. Fowler. 2017. “Two Heads May Be More Responsible Than One: Co-CEOs and Corporate Social Performance.” Journal of Management Policy and Practice 18 (2): 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hmieleski, K. M., M. S. Cole, and R. A. Baron. 2012. “Shared Authentic Leadership and New Venture Performance.” Journal of Management 38 (5): 1476–1499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. H. 1980. “Motivation. Leadership, and Organization: Do American Theories Apply Abroad.” Organization Dynamics 9 (1): 42–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, S., S. W. Lin, W. P. Chen, and J. W. Huang. 2021. “CEO Duality, Information Costs, and Firm Performance.” The North American Journal of Economics and Finance 55: 101011. doi:10.1016/j.najef.2019.101011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. T., L. D. Cushenbery, and B. Jayne. 2017. “Why Dual Leaders Will Drive Innovation: Resolving the Exploration and Exploitation Dilemma with a Conservation of Resources Solution.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 38 (8): 1183–1195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, R., P. Richard, and L. Leonard. 2015. “Who’s in Charge Here? Co-CEOs, Power Gaps, and Firm Performance.” Strategy Management Journal 36 (13): 2099–2110. doi:10.1002/smj.2325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutlu, C. C., M. van Essen, M. W. Peng, S. F. Saleh, and P. Duran. 2018. “Corporate Governance in China: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Management Studies 55 (6): 943–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. L., and J. A. Conger. 2002. Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. California, US: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, M. W., S. Zhang, and X. Li. 2007. “CEO Duality and Firm Performance During China’s Institutional Transitions.” Management and Organization Review 3 (2): 205–225.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., and G. R. Salancik. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, N., K. B. Oh, and R. Pech. 2015. “Mergers and Acquisitions: CEO Duality, Operating Performance and Stock Returns in Vietnam.” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 35: 298–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, D., and Q. Pham. 2020. “The Impact of CEO Duality on Firm Performance: Examining the Life-Cycle Theory in Vietnam.” Accounting 6 (5): 737–747. doi:10.5267/j.ac.2020.6.010.
   Google Scholar
• Simsek, Z., C. Heavey, J. F. Veiga, and D. Souder. 2009. “A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity’s Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes.” Journal of Management Studies 46 (5): 864–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taghian, M., C. D’Souza, and M. Polonsky. 2015. “A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility, Reputation and Business Performance.” Social Responsibility Journal 11 (2): 340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, X., Liu, Y., Yue, L. 2015 “The influence of power inequality of the executive team on the innovation intensity of enterprises: Moderated mediating effect.” Nankai Management Review 18 (3): 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. 2000. “The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead.” Journal of Economic Literature 38 (3): 595–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, T., and S. Zhao. 2014. “CEO Duality and Firm Performance: Evidence from an Exogenous Shock to the Competitive Environment.” Journal of Banking & Finance 49: 534–552. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellweger, T. M., and R. S. Nason. 2008. “A Stakeholder Perspective on Family Firm Performance.” Family Business Review 21 (3): 203–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar