References
- Aggarwal, P., and A. K. Singh. 2019. “CSR and Sustainability Reporting Practices in India: An In-Depth Content Analysis of Top-Listed Companies.” Social Responsibility Journal 15 (8): 1033–1053. doi:10.1108/SRJ-03-2018-0078.
- Battilana, J., M. Besharov, and B. Mitzinneck. 2017. “On Hybrids and Hybrid Organizing: A Review and Roadmap for Future Research.” The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism 2: 133–169.
- Battilana, J., M. Sengul, A. C. Pache, and J. Model. 2015. “Harnessing Productive Tensions in Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Work Integration Social Enterprises.” Academy of Management Journal 58 (6): 1658–1685.
- Ebrahim, A., J. Battilana, and J. Mair. 2014. “The Governance of Social Enterprises: Mission Drift and Accountability Challenges in Hybrid Organizations.” Research in Organizational Behavior 34: 81–100. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2014.09.001.
- Hiller, J. S. 2013. “The Benefit Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibility.” Journal of Business Ethics 118 (2): 287–301. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1580-3.
- McGuire, J. B., A. Sundgren, and T. Schneeweis. 1988. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 31 (4): 854–872. doi:10.2307/256342.
- Munnell, A. H., G. M. Tootell, L. E. Browne, and J. McEneaney. 1996. “Mortgage Lending in Boston: Interpreting HMDA Data.” The American Economic Review 86 (1): 25–53.
- Murray, S. M. 2018. “Explaining the Adoption of Benefit Corporation Law by the US States.” Journal of Financial Economic Policy 10 (3): 351–368.
- Nosratabadi, S., A. Mosavi, S. Shamshirband, E. Kazimieras Zavadskas, A. Rakotonirainy, and K. W. Chau. 2019. “Sustainable Business Models: A Review.” Sustainability 11 (6): 1663, 1–30.
- Pache, A. C., and F. Santos. 2013. “Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics.” Academy of Management Journal 56 (4): 972–1001.
- Ventura, L. 2022. “Philanthropy and the For-Profit Corporation: The Benefit Corporation as the New Form of Firm Altruism.” European Business Organization Law Review 23 (3): 603–632. doi:10.1007/s40804-021-00227-x.