World Heritage and the Local Community: The Case of Atapuerca (Burgos, Spain)

Bibliography

• Alonso, R. & Martín, A. 2013. Atapuerca y el Museo de la Evolución Humana. Historia de un modelo de difusión del patrimonio [Atapuerca and the Museum of Human Evolution. History of a Diffusion Model Heritage]. Treballs d’Arqueologia, 19: 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Ascherson, N. 2000. Editorial. Public. Archaeology, 1(1): 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, D. 2014. Public Archaeology, The Move Towards. In: C. Smith, ed. Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Section: Legislation. Nueva York: Springer, pp. 6182-6188.
   Google Scholar
• Atalay, S. 2012. Community-Based Archaeology. Research with, by, and for Indigenous and Local Communities. California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Avrami, E., Mason, R., & De la Torre, M. 2000. Values and Heritage Conservation. Research Report. Los Angeles, CA: The Getty Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bernal, B. 2009. La intrusión de la arquitectura de autor en los lugares de la historia como proceso de desarrollo y salvación económica de una ciudad media: El museo de la evolución humana: realidad y paradoja [The Intrusion of Signature Architecture in Places of History as a Process of Development and Economic Salvation of an Average City: The Museum of Human Evolution: Reality and Paradox]. In: Board Andalusia, ed. Ciudades, culturas y fronteras en un mundo en cambio. Consejería de Obras Públicas y Transportes [Cities, Cultures and Borders in a Changing World. Ministry of Public Works and Transport]: Seville, pp. 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R. & Taylor, S. 1975. Introduction to qualitative research methods: A phenomenological approach to the social sciences. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, G. & Gilliam, A. 1997. Social Construction of the Past: Representation as Power. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caraballo Perichi, C. 2012. El patrimonio cultural y la gestión participativa: ejercicio incompleto de los derechos de la ciudadanía [The Cultural Heritage and Participatory Management: Incomplete Exercise Rights the Citizenship]. Revista de derechos humanos [Magazine Human Rights], 6: 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Carman, J. 1996. Valuing ancient things. Archaeology and the law. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L. & K. Morrison. 2007. Research Methods in Education. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2000. European Landscape Convention. [ on line]. Florence, 20 October 2000 [accessed July 2015]. Available at <http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/176.htm>.
   Google Scholar
• Díez, C., Moral, S. & Navazo, M. 2009. La sierra de Atapuerca. Un viaje a nuestros orígenes [The Sierra de Atapuerca. A Trip to Our Origins]. Burgos: Ed. Everest.
   Google Scholar
• Díez, C., Navazo, M., Alonso, R., Pérez, M. & Labarga, A. 2014. Illustrated guide to Atapuerca. Burgos: University of Burgos.
   Google Scholar
• Endere, M. 2007. Management of archaeological sites and the public in Argentina. Oxford: Archaeopress (BAR International Series 1708).
   Google Scholar
• Funari, P. 1999. Public Archaeology in Brazil. Paper presented in the World Archaeology Congress 4, South Africa, January 1999.
   Google Scholar
• García Canclini, N. 1999. Los usos sociales del patrimonio cultural [The Social uses of Cultural Heritage]. En: E. Aguilar Criado, ed. Patrimonio etnológico, Nuevas perspectivas de estudio [Ethnological Heritage, New Perspectives of Study]. Seville: Consejería de la Cultura, Junta de Andalucía [Ministry of Culture, Government of Andalusia], pp. 16-33.
   Google Scholar
• González, A., Calleja, V., López, EL., Padrino, P. & Puebla, P. 2010. Los estudios de encuesta [The Survey Studies] [ on line]. UAM [accessed October 2014]. Available at <http://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/stmaria/jmurillo/InvestigacionEE/Presentaciones/Encuesta_doc.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• González Méndez, M. 2000. La revalorización del patrimonio arqueológico. La definición de un programa para el ayuntamiento de Toques (A. Coruña) The revaluation of the Archaeological heritage. The Definition of a Program for Municipality of Toques (A Coruña). Santiago de Compostela: Xunta de Galicia-Dirección Xeral do Patrimonio Histórico e Documental [Galician Government-Address Xeral do Patrimonio Historic and Documentary].
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. 2000. De la observación a la investigación-acción participativa: una visión crítica de las prácticas antropológicas [From Observation to Participatory Action Research: A Critical View of the Practices Anthropological]. Revista de Antropología Social [Journal of Social Anthropology], 9: 27–49.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M. & McArthur, S. 1996. Heritage management in New Zealand and Australia. The Human Dimension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS. 1990. Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage. Lausanne: ICOMOS.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS. 1999. International Charter for Cultural Tourism Managing Tourism at Places of Heritage significant. Mexico: ICOMOS.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS. 2008. Charter on the Interpretation and Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites. Quebec: ICOMOS.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, J., ed. 1997. Presenting archaeology to the public. Digging for truth. London: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, K. ed. 1995. Nara Conference on Authenticity. Nara, Japan, 1-6 November, 1994. Proceedings. UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Agency for Cultural Affairs (Japan), ICCROM, ICOMOS. Agency for Cultural Affairs, Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Leal, A.F. & Leal, E.A. 2012. Políticas públicas, culturas populares e patrimônio cultural imaterial: Meios e alternativas [Public Policies, Popular Culture and Cultural Heritage Imaterial: Meios and Alternatives]. Espaco Geografico em Analise, 26: 247–269.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, D. 1985. The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marquis-Kyle, P. & Walker, M. 1996. The Illustrated Burra Charter. Making good decisions about the care of important places. Brisbane: Australia ICOMOS, Australia Heritage Commission.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, P. 1998. Finding out what the public knows and what they would like to know. The Museum Archaeologist, 24: 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, P. 2000. Archaeological display and the public. Museology and Interpretation, 2nd ed. London: Archetype Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Merriman, N. 1991. Beyond the Glass Case. The Past, the Heritage and the Public. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merriman, N. 2004. Public archaeology. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moshenska, G. 2009. What is Public Archaeology? Present Pasts, 1: 46–48.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, A. 1998. Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, M & Sullivan, S. 1995. Looking after heritage places. The basics of heritage planning for managers, landowners and administrators. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prats, L. 2005. Concepto y gestión del patrimonio local [Concept and Management of Local Heritage]. Cuadernos de Antropología Social [Journal of Social Anthropology], 21: 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Preucel, R. & Hodder, I. 1996. Constructing Identities. In: A. Reader, R. Preucel and I. Hodder, eds. Contemporary Archaeology in Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 601-614.
   Google Scholar
• Sanoja Obediente, M. 1982. La política cultural y la preservación del patrimonio nacional en América Latina [The Cultural Policy and the Preservation of National Heritage in Latin America]. In: R. Wilson and G. Loyola, eds. Arqueología de rescate. Washington: Preservation Press, pp. 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Shadla-Hall, T. 1999. Public Archaeology. European Journal of Archaeology, 2(2): 147–158.10.1179/eja.1999.2.2.147
   Google Scholar
• Stone, P. 1989. Interpretations and uses of the past in modern Britain and europe. Why are people interested in the past? Do the experts know or care? A plea for further study. In: R. Lyton, ed. Who needs the past?. London: Unwin, pp. 195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. & Tomer, T. 2013. Community Participation and the Tangible and Intangible Values of Urban heritage. Heritage & Society, 6(2): 185–198.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2008. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage convention. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2014. Managing Cultural World Heritage. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
   Google Scholar