The other-race effect: Holistic coding differences and beyond

REFERENCES

• Buckhout, R., & Regan, S. (1988). Explorations in research on the other-race effect in face recognition. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 40–46). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bukach, C., Cottle, J., Ubiwa, J., & Miller, J. (2012). Individuation experience predicts other-race effects in holistic processing for both Caucasian and Black participants. Cognition, 123, 319–324. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, H. F., Boland, J. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 12629–12633. doi:10.1073/pnas.0506162102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crookes, K., Favelle, S., & Hayward, W. G. (2013). Holistic processing for other-race faces in Chinese participants occurs for upright but not inverted faces. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 29. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeGutis, J., Mercado, R. J., Wilmer, J., & Rosenblatt, A. (2013). Individual differences in holistic processing predict the own-race advantage in recognition memory. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e58253. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058253
   Google Scholar
• DeGutis, J., Wilmer, J., Mercado, R. J., & Cohan, S. (2013). Using regression to measure holistic face processing reveals a strong link with face recognition ability. Cognition, 126(1), 87–100. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, K. J., & Rhodes, G. (2008). Contact, configural coding and the other-race effect in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 45–56. doi:10.1348/000712607X199981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, S., Gauthier, I., Hayward, W. G., & Richler, J. J. (2013). Other-race effects in holistic processing: Time matters. Visual Cognition. doi:10.1080/13506285.2013.824530
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, W. G., Crookes, K., Chu, M. H., Favelle, S., & Rhodes, G. (2013). Holistic processing of configural and component face information. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, W. G., Rhodes, G., & Schwaninger, A. (2008). An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition. Cognition, 106, 1017–1027. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hole, G. J. (1994). Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces. Perception, 23(1), 65–74. doi:10.1068/p230065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugenberg, K., & Corneille, O. (2009). Holistic processsing is tuned for in-group faces. Cognitive Science, 33, 1173–1181. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01048.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel, J. E. (2001). Complementary solutions to the binding problem in vision: Implications for shape perception and object recognition. Visual Cognition, 8(3–5), 489–517. doi:10.1080/13506280143000214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99(3), 480–517. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., & Larsen, J. T. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at new look. Psychological Science, 14, 201–206. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.02432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, R. C. L., Mansour, J. K., Bertrand, M. I., Kalmet, N., & Melsom, E. I. (2011). Face recognition in eyewitness memory. In A. J. Calder, G. Rhodes, M. H. Johnson, & J. V. Haxby (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of face perception (pp. 307–328). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 922–934. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheson, H. E., Bilsbury, T. G., & McMullen, P. A. (2012). Second-order relational face processing is applied to faces of different race and photographic contrast. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(1), 51–62. doi:10.1037/a0026062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 255–260. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01903-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKone, E., & Yovel, G. (2009). Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(5), 778–797. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.5.778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megreya, A. M., White, D., & Burton, A. M. (2011). The other-race effect does not rely on memory: Evidence from a matching task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(8), 1473–1483. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.575228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, C., Caldara, R., & Rossion, B. (2006). Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces. Visual Cognition, 14(1), 55–73. doi:10.1080/13506280500158761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, C., Corneille, O., & Rossion, B. (2007). Race categorization modulates holistic face encoding. Cognitive Science, 31, 911–924. doi:10.1080/03640210701530805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, C., Corneille, O., & Rossion, B. (2010). Holistic face encoding is modulated by perceived face race: Evidence from perceptual adaptation. Visual Cognition, 18(3), 434–455. doi:10.1080/13506280902819697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, C., Rossion, B., Bülthoff, I., Hayward, W. G., & Vuong, Q. C. (2013). The contribution of shape and surface information in the other-race face effect. Visual Cognition. doi:10.1080/13506285.2013.823141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, C., Rossion, B., Han, J., Chung, C.-S., & Caldara, R. (2006). Holistic processing is finely tuned for face of one's own race. Psychological Science, 17(7), 608–615. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01752.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondloch, C. J., Elms, N., Maurer, D., Rhodes, G., Hayward, W. G., Tanaka, J. W., & Zhou, G. (2010). Processes underlying the cross-race effect: An investigation of holistic, featural, and relational processing of own- vs other-race faces. Perception, 39, 1065–1085. doi:10.1068/p6608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakabayashi, K., Lloyd-Jones, T. J., Butcher, N., & Liu, C. H. (2012). Independent influences of verbalization and race on the configural and featural processing of faces: A behavioral and eye movement study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1), 61–77. doi:10.1037/a0024853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, M., Boynton, G. M., & Fine, I. (2008). Face adaptation does not improve performance on search or discrimination tasks. Journal of Vision, 8(1), 1–20. doi:10.1167/8.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, M., Ciaramitaro, V. M., Anstis, S., Boynton, G. M., & Fine, I. (2006). Selectivity for the configural cues that identify the gender, ethnicity, and identity of faces in human cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 103(51), 19552–19557. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605358104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G. (1993). Configural coding, expertise, and the right hemisphere advantage for face recognition. Brain and Cognition, 22(1), 19–41. doi:10.1006/brcg.1993.1022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G. (2013). Face recognition. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 46–68). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G., Ewing, L., Hayward, W. G., Maurer, D., Mondloch, C. J., & Tanaka, J. W. (2009). Contact and other-race effects in configural and component processing of faces. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 717–728. doi:10.1348/000712608X396503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G., Hayward, W. G., & Winkler, C. (2006). Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13(3), 499–505. doi:10.3758/BF03193876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G., Lie, H. C., Ewing, L., Evangelista, E., & Tanaka, J. W. (2010). Does perceived race affect discrimination and recognition of ambiguous-race faces? A test of the sociocognitive hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(1), 217–223. doi:10.1037/a0017680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G., Tan, S., Brake, S., & Taylor, K. (1989). Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 313–331. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1989.tb02323.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richler, J. J., Cheung, O. S., & Gauthier, I. (2011). Holistic processing predicts face recognition. Psychological Science, 22(4), 464–471. doi:10.1177/0956797611401753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richler, J. J., & Gauthier, I. (2013). When intuition fails to align with data: A reply to Rossion (2013). Visual Cognition, 21(2), 254–276. doi:10.1080/13506285.2013.796035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richler, J. J., Mack, M. L., Palmeri, T. J., & Gauthier, I. (2011). Inverted faces are (eventually) processed holistically. Vision Research, 51, 333–342. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, R., & McKone, E. (2007). No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks. Cognition, 103(1), 34–79. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion, B. (2008). Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychologica, 128, 274–289. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion, B. (2013). The composite face illusion: A whole window into our understanding of holistic face perception. Visual Cognition, 21(2), 139–253. doi:10.1080/13506285.2013.772929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion, B., & Michel, C. (2011). An experience-based holistic account of the other-race face effect. In A. Calder, G. Rhodes, J. V. Haxby, & M. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of face perception (pp. 215–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwaninger, A., Lobmaier, J. S., & Collishaw, S. M. (2002). Role of featural and configural information in familiar and unfamiliar face recognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2525, 643–650.
   Google Scholar
• Sekuler, A. B., Gaspar, C. M., Gold, J. M., & Bennett, P. J. (2004). Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing. Current Biology, 14, 391–396. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekunova, A., & Barton, J. J. S. (2008). The effects of face inversion on the perception of long-range and local spatial relations in eye and mouth configuration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1129–1135. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W. (Ed.). (2013). Own versus other: The effects of race, gender, age and species on human face processes. Visual Cognition, Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A(2), 225–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., & Gordon, I. (2011). Features, configuration, and holistic face processing. In A. J. Calder, G. Rhodes, M. H. Johnson, & J. V. Haxby (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of face perception (pp. 177–194). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., Kiefer, M., & Bukach, C. M. (2004). A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: Evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition, 93(1), B1–B9. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986). The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. Acta Psychologica, 61, 259–273. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(86)90085-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Li, J., Fang, H., Tian, M., & Liu, J. (2012). Individual differences in holistic processing predict face recognition ability. Psychological Science, 23(2), 169–177. doi:10.1177/0956797611420575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, M. A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y., & Duhamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature, 428, 557–561. doi:10.1038/nature02420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, A. C.-N., Palmeri, T. J., & Gauthier, I. (2009). Conditions for face-like expertise with objects: Becoming a Ziggerin expert—but which type? Psychological Science, 20(9), 1108–1117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02430.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 141–145. doi:10.1037/h0027474
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747–759. doi:10.1068/p160747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar