Eye tracking research and technology: Towards objective measurement of data quality

REFERENCES

• Bernard, J. B., Scherlen, A. C., & Castet, E. (2007). Page mode reading with simulated scotomas: A modest effect of interline spacing on reading speed. Vision Research, 47, 3447–3459. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collewijn, H., van der Mark, F., & Jansen, T. C. (1975). Precise recording of human eye movements. Vision Research, 15, 447–450. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(75)90098-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchowski, A. T. (2003). Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision Research, 43, 1035–1045. 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00084-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frens, M. A., & van der Geest, J. N. (2002). Scleral search coils influence saccade dynamics. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 692–698. doi:10.1152/jn.00457.2001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka,H., & van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., & Mulvey, F. (2012). Eye tracker data quality: What it is and how to measure it. Proceedings of the 2012 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 45–52). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R. (1998). Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 29–54). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, D. L., Mammo, D., & Newsome, W. T. (2012). Tracking the eye non-invasively: Simultaneous comparison of the scleral search coil and optical tracking techniques in the macaque monkey. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 6(49), 1–17. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlbecher, S., Bartl, K., Bardins, S., & Schneider, E. (2010). Low-latency combined eye and head tracking system for teleoperating a robotic head in real-time. Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 117–120). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Liversedge, S. P., Gilchrist, I. D., & Everling, S. (2011). The Oxford handbook of eye movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McConkie, G. W. (1981). Evaluating and reporting data quality in eye movement research. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 13, 97–106. doi:10.3758/BF03207916
   Google Scholar
• McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 578–586. doi:10.3758/BF03203972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkie, G. W., Wolverton, G. S., & Zola, D. (1984). Instrumentation considerations in research involving eye-movement contingent stimulus control. In A. G. Gale & F. Johnson (Eds.), Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 39–47). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• McConkie, G. W., Zola, D., Wolverton, G. S., & Burns, D. D. (1978). Eye movement contingent display control in studying reading. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 10, 154–166. doi:10.3758/BF03205118
   Google Scholar
• Plant, R. R., Hammond, N., & Turner, G. (2004). Self-validating presentation and response timing in cognitive paradigms: How and why? Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 291–303. 10.3758/BF03195575
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plant, R. R., & Quinlan, P. T. (2013). Could millisecond timing errors in commonly used equipment be a cause of replication failure in some neuroscience studies? Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 598–614. 10.3758/s13415-013-0166-6
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). The thirty-fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingold, E. M., Loschky, L. C., McConkie, G. W., & Stampe, D. M. (2003). Gaze-contingent multi-resolutional displays: An integrative review. Human Factors, 45, 307–328. doi:10.1518/hfes.45.2.307.27235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richlan, F., Gagl, B.Schuster, S., Hawelka, S., Humenberger, J., & Hutzler, F. (2013). A new high-speed visual stimulation method for gaze-contingent eye movement and brain activity studies. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 24. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00024
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider, E., Villgrattner, T., Vockeroth, J., Bartl, K., Kohlbecher, S., Bardins, S., Ulbrich, H., & Brandt, T. (2009). EyeSeeCam: An eye movement-driven head camera for the examination of natural visual exploration. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1164, 461–467. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.03858.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traisk, F., Bolzani, R., & Ygge, J. (2005). A comparison between the magnetic scleral search coil and infrared reflection methods for saccadic eye movement analysis. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 243, 791–797. doi:10.1007/s00417-005-1148-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Geest, J. N., & Frens, M. A. (2002). Recording eye movements with video-oculography and sclera search coils: A direct comparison of two methods. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 114, 185–195. doi:10.1016/S0165-0270(01)00527-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villgrattner, T., Schneider, E., Andersch, P., & Ulbrich, H. (2011). Compact high dynamic 3 DoF camera orientation system: Development and control. Journal of System Design and Dynamics, 5, 819–828. doi:10.1299/jsdd.5.819
   Google Scholar