A rapid effect of stimulus quality on the durations of individual fixations during reading

REFERENCES

• Besner, D., & Roberts, M. A. (2003). Reading nonwords aloud: Results requiring change in the dual route cascaded model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10(2), 398–404. doi:10.3758/BF03196498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borowsky, R., & Besner, D. (1993). Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(4), 813–840. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.4.813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braet, W., & Humphreys, G. (2006a). The “special effect” of case mixing on word identification: Neuropsychological and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies dissociating case mixing from contrast reduction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(10), 1666–1675. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braet, W., & Humphreys, G. W. (2006b). Case mixing and the right parietal cortex: Evidence from rTMS. Experimental Brain Research, 168(1–2), 265–271. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0085-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braet, W., & Humphreys, G. (2007). A selective effect of parietal damage on letter identification in mixed case words. Neuropsychologia, 45(10), 2226–2233. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreighe, D. (2008). Foveal processing and word skipping during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(4), 856–860. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.4.856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (2012). Direct control of fixation times in scene viewing: Evidence from analysis of the distribution of first fixation duration. Visual Cognition, 20, 605–626. doi:10.1080/13506285.2012.666295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., Nuthmann, A., & Luke, S. G. (2013). Eye movement control during scene viewing: Immediate effects of scene luminance on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(3), 318–322. doi:10.1037/a0031224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman, C. M., Chernecki, D., & Norris, D. (1999). Naming case alternated words. Memory & Cognition, 27(2), 254–266. doi:10.3758/BF03211410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayall, K., Humphreys, G. W., & Olson, A. (1997). Disruption to word or letter processing? The origins of case-mixing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(5), 1275–1286. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkie, G. W., & Yang, S.-N. (2003). How cognition affects eye movements during reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 413–427). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). The Thirty-fifth Sir Frederick Barlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125–157. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingold, E. M., & Glaholt, M. G. ( in press). Cognitive control of fixation duration in visual search: The role of extrafoveal processing. Visual Cognition.
   Google Scholar
• Reingold, E. M., & Rayner, K. (2006). Examining the word identification stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model. Psychological Science, 17(9), 742–746. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01775.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingold, E. M., Reichle, E. D., Glaholt, M. G., & Sheridan, H. (2012). Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 177–206. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingold, E. M., & Stampe, D. M. (2000). Saccadic inhibition and gaze contingent research paradigms. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 119–145). Elsevier: Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Reingold, E. M., & Stampe, D. M. (2002). Saccadic inhibition in voluntary and reflexive saccades. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(3), 371–388. doi:10.1162/089892902317361903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingold, E. M., & Stampe, D. M. (2004). Saccadic inhibition in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 30(1), 194–211. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.30.1.194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, H., Rayner, K., & Reingold, E. M. (2013). Unsegmented text delays word identification: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations. Visual Cognition, 21, 38–60. doi:10.1080/13506285.2013.767296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, H., & Reingold, E. M. (2012a). Perceptual specificity effects in rereading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 255–269. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, H., & Reingold, E. M. (2012b). Perceptually specific and perceptually non-specific influences on rereading benefits for spatially transformed text: Evidence from eye movements. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(4), 1739–1747. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, H., & Reingold, E. M. (2013). A further examination of the lexical processing stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. doi:10.3758/s13414-013-0442.0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Staub, A., White, S. J., Drieghe, D., Hollway, E. C., & Rayner, K. (2010). Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 1280–1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C.-A., & Inhoff, A. W. (2010). The influence of visual contrast and case changes on parafoveal preview benefits during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 805–817. doi:10.1080/17470210903147494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S. J., & Staub, A. (2012). The distribution of fixation durations during reading: Effects of stimulus quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 603–617. doi:10.1037/a0025338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S.-N. (2009). Effects of gaze-contingent changes on fixation duration in reading. Vision Research, 49, 2843–2855. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S.-N. (2012). Effects of processing difficulty on eye movements in reading: A review of behavioral and neural observations. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 5(4): 1, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S.-N., & McConkie, G. W. (2001). Eye movements during reading: A theory of saccade initiation times. Vision Research, 41(25–26), 3567–3585. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00025-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S.-N., & McConkie, G. W. (2004). Saccade generation during reading: Are words necessary? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1–2), 226–261. doi:10.1080/09541440340000231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar