Distractors that signal reward attract the eyes

REFERENCES

• Anderson, B. A. (2013). A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2012). Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1644–1653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011a). Learned value magnifies salience-based attentional capture. PLoS One, 6(11), e27926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011b). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 10367–10371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 437–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucker, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2014). The effect of reward on orienting and reorienting in exogenous cuing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 635–646. doi:10.3758/s13415-014-0278-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelazzi, L., Perlato, A., Santandrea, E., & Della Libera, C. (2013). Rewards teach visual selective attention. Vision Research, 85, 58–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(3), 201–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coren, S., & Hoenig, P. (1972). Effect of non-target stimuli upon length of voluntary saccades. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 34, 499–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Libera, C., & Chelazzi, L. (2009). Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses. Psychological Science, 20, 778–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelmann, J. B., Damaraju, E., Padmala, S., & Pessoa, L. (2009). Combined effects of attention and motivation on visual task performance: Transient and sustained motivational effects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 4. doi:10.3389/neuro.09.004.2009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Failing, M. F., & Theeuwes, J. (2014). Exogenous visual orienting by reward. Journal of Vision, 14(5), 6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fecteau, J. H., & Munoz, D. P. (2006). Salience, relevance, and firing: A priority map for target selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 382–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay, J. M. (1982). Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 22, 1033–1045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godijn, R., & Theeuwes, J. (2002). Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: Evidence for a competitive integration model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeman, J., Theeuwes, J., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2014). The time course of top-down control on saccade averaging. Vision Research, 100, 29–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, C., Chelazzi, L., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 11096–11103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 194–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, Á., & Campana, G. (2010). Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(1), 5–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Pelley, M. E., Pearson, D., Griffiths, O., & Beesley, T. ( in press). When goals conflict with values: Counterproductive attentional and oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeter, M., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2013). Visual priming through a boost of the target signal: Evidence from saccadic landing positions. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 75, 1336–1341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvis, J. D., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2013). How memory mechanisms are a key component in the guidance of our eye movements: Evidence from the global effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 357–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, D. M., Gitelman, D., Simmons, K., Bloise, S. M., Parrish, T., & Mesulam, M. M. (2005). Monetary incentives enhance processing in brain regions mediating top-down control of attention. Cerebral Cortex, 15(12), 1855–1865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 77–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J., & Belopolsky, A. V. (2012). Reward grabs the eye: Oculomotor capture by rewarding stimuli. Vision Research, 74, 80–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., & Irwin, D. E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science, 9, 379–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A., & Jackson, S. R. (1997). Selective reaching to grasp: Evidence for distractor interference effects. Visual Cognition, 4(1), 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Stigchel, S., & Nijboer, T. C. (2011). The global effect: What determines where the eyes land. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 4(2), 1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Stigchel, S., Heeman, J., & Nijboer, T. C. W. (2012). Averaging is not everything: The saccade global effect weakens with increasing stimulus size. Vision Research, 62, 108–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zoest, W., Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2004). The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar