The influence of experience upon information-sampling and decision-making behaviour during risk assessment in military personnel

REFERENCES

• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data a practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, A. T., Cain, M. S., Clark, K., Darling, E. F., & Mitroff, S. R. (2013). Assessing visual search performance differences between Transportation Security Administration Officers and nonprofessional visual searchers. Visual Cognition, 21(3), 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, A. T., & Mitroff, S. R. (2014a). Differences in multiple-target visual search performance between non-professional and professional searchers due to decision-making criteria. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 1–13. doi:10.1111/bjop.12096
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, A. T., & Mitroff, S. R. (2014b). Different predictors of multiple-target search accuracy between nonprofessional and professional visual searchers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1335–1348. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.859715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, M. R., Watson, M. R., & Meier, K. M. (2009). Errors, efficiency, and the interplay between attention and category learning. Cognition, 112, 330–336. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, M. R., Watson, M. R., Walshe, R. C., & Maj, F. (2009). Extremely selective attention: eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1196–1206. doi:10.1037/a0016272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, M. S., Adamo, S. H., & Mitroff, S. R. (2013). A taxonomy of errors in multiple-target visual search. Visual Cognition, 21, 899–921. doi:10.1080/13506285.2013.843627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, P. R., & Underwood, G. (1998). Visual search of driving situations: danger and experience. Perception, 27, 951–964. doi:10.1068/p270951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charness, N., Reingold, E. M., Pomplun, M., & Stampe, D. M. (2001). The perceptual aspect of skilled performance in chess: evidence from eye movements. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1146–1152. doi:10.3758/BF03206384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., Meier, K. M., Blair, M. R., Watson, M. R., & Wood, M. J. (2013). Temporal characteristics of overt attentional behavior during category learning. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 75, 244–256. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0395-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., & Hegdé, J. (2012). Learning to break camouflage by learning the background. Psychological Science, 23, 1395–1403. doi:10.1177/0956797612445315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. M., & Wolfe, J. M. (1996). Just say no: how are visual searches terminated when there is no target present? Cognitive Psychology, 30(1), 39–78. doi:10.1006/cogp.1996.0002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R., Howard, C. J., Attwood, A. S., Stirland, R., Rostant, V., Renton, L., … Munafò, M. R. (2013). Acutely induced anxiety increases negative interpretations of events in a closed-circuit television monitoring task. Cognition & Emotion, 27, 273–282. doi:10.1080/02699931.2012.704352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin, H. J., Menneer, T., Cave, K. R., & Donnelly, N. (2010). Dual-target search for high and low prevalence X-ray threat targets. Visual Cognition, 18, 1439–1493. doi:10.1080/13506285.2010.500605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin, H. J., Menneer, T., Cave, K. R., Helman, S., Way, R. L., & Donnelly, N. (2010). The impact of relative prevalence on dual-target search for threat items from airport X-ray screening. Acta Psychologica, 134(1), 79–84. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin, H. J., Menneer, T., Cave, K. R., Thaibsyah, M., & Donnelly, N. (2014). The effects of increasing target prevalence on information processing during visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(2), 469–475. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0686-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin, H. J., Menneer, T., Riggs, C. A., Cave, K. R., & Donnelly, N. (2015). Perceptual failures in the selection and identification of low-prevalence targets in relative prevalence visual search. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 77, 150–159. doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0762-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegdé, J., Fang, F., Murray, S. O., & Kersten, D. (2008). Preferential responses to occluded objects in the human visual cortex. Journal of Vision, 8(4), 1–16. doi:10.1167/8.4.16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegdé, J., Thompson, S. K., Brady, M., & Kersten, D. (2012). Object recognition in clutter: Cortical responses depend on the type of learning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 170. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundel, H. L., & Nodine, C. F. (1975). Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search. Radiology, 116, 527–532. doi:10.1148/116.3.527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Menneer, T., Donnelly, N., Godwin, H. J., & Cave, K. R. (2010). High or low target prevalence increases the dual-target cost in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 133–144. doi:10.1037/a0019569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nodine, C. F., & Kundel, L. (1987). Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection. RadioGraphics, 7, 1241–1250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nodine, C. F., & Mello-Thoms, C. (2000). The nature of expertise in radiology. In J. Beutel, H. L. Kundel, & R. L. Van Metter (Eds.), The handbook of medical image: Physics and psychophysics (pp. 859–894). Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reingold, E. M., & Sheridan, H. (2011). Eye movements and visual expertise in chess and medicine. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford handbook on eye movements (pp. 523–550). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwark, J. D., MacDonald, J., Sandry, J., & Dolgov, I. (2013). Prevalence-based decisions undermine visual search. Visual Cognition, 21, 541–568. doi:10.1080/13506285.2013.811135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, G., Crundall, D., & Chapman, P. (2002). Selective searching while driving: The role of experience in hazard detection and general surveillance. Ergonomics, 45(1), 1–12. doi:10.1080/00140130110110610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wert, M. J., Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2009). Even in correctable search, some types of rare targets are frequently missed. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 541–553. doi:10.3758/APP.71.3.541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Brunelli, D. N., Rubinstein, J., & Horowitz, T. S. (2013). Prevalence effects in newly trained airport checkpoint screeners : Trained observers miss rare targets, too. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 1–9. doi:10.1167/13.3.33
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., & Kenner, N. M. (2005). Rare items often missed in visual searches. Nature, 435, 6–7. doi:10.1038/435439a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Van Wert, M. J., Kenner, N. M., Place, S. S., & Kibbi, N. (2007). Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 623–638. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., & Van Wert, M. J. (2010). Varying target prevalence reveals two dissociable decision criteria in visual search. Current Biology, 20(2), 121–124. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar