302
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Idiosyncratic body motion influences person recognition

&
Pages 539-549 | Received 27 Jun 2016, Accepted 26 Aug 2016, Published online: 20 Sep 2016

References

  • Agnew, H. C., Phillips, L. H., & Pilz, K. S. (2016). Global form and motion processing in healthy ageing. Acta Psychologica, 166, 12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.03.005
  • Bertenthal, B. I., & Pinto, J. (1994). Global processing of biological motions. Psychological Science, 5(4), 221–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00504.x
  • Blake, R., & Shiffrar, M. (2007). Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 47–73. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190152
  • Blanz, V., & Vetter, T. (1999). A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. In Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques – Siggraph “99 (pp. 187–194). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/311535.311556
  • Bower, G. H., & Karlin, M. B. (1974). Depth of processing pictures of faces and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103(4), 751–757. doi: 10.1037/h0037190
  • Bruce, V., Henderson, Z., Newman, C., & Burton, A. M. (2001). Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(3), 207–218. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11676099
  • Bruce, V., & Valentine, T. (1985). Identity priming in the recognition of familiar faces. British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953), 76(Pt 3), 373–383. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4041705
  • Bruce, V., & Young, A. W. (2012). Face perception. East Sussex: Psychology Press.
  • Burton, A. M., Wilson, S., Cowan, M., & Bruce, V. (1999). Face recognition in poor-quality video: Evidence from security surveillance. Psychological Science, 10(3), 243–248. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00144
  • Butcher, N., & Lander, K. (2016). Exploring the motion advantage: Evaluating the contribution of familiarity and differences in facial motion. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1–11. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1138974
  • Christie, F., & Bruce, V. (1998). The role of dynamic information in the recognition of unfamiliar faces. Memory & Cognition, 26(4), 780–790. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9701969 doi: 10.3758/BF03211397
  • Chuang, L. L., Vuong, Q. C., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2012). Learned Non-rigid object motion is a view-invariant cue to recognizing novel objects. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6, 26. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00026
  • Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2001). Defining the cortical visual systems: “What”, “where”, and “how”. Acta Psychologica, 107(1-3), 43–68. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11388142 doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00021-X
  • Cutting, J. E., & Kozlowski, L. T. (1977). Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9(5), 353–356. doi: 10.3758/BF03337021
  • Dittrich, W. H., Troscianko, T., Lea, S. E. G., & Morgan, D. (1996). Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception, 25(6), 727–738. doi: 10.1068/p250727
  • Freyd, J. J. (1987) Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review, 94, 427–438. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.427
  • Gesellensetter, L., Krämer, N. C., & Wachsmuth, I. (2005). A conversational agent as museum guide – Design and evaluation of a real-world application. The 5th International Working Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.93.7488
  • Giese, M. A., & Poggio, T. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 4(3), 179–192. doi: 10.1038/nrn1057
  • Grafton, S. T., Arbib, M. A., Fadiga, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography 2. Observation compared with imagination. Experimental Brain Research, 112(1), 103–111. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8951412 doi: 10.1007/BF00227183
  • Griesser, R. T., Cunningham, D. W., Wallraven, C., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2007). Psychophysical investigation of facial expressions using computer animated faces. In Proceedings of the 4th symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization – APGV “07 (p. 11). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/1272582.1272585
  • Grossman, E. D., & Blake, R. (2002). Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron, 35(6), 1167–1175. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12354405 doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00897-8
  • Grossman, E. D., Donnelly, M., Price, R., Pickens, D., Morgan, V., Neighbor, G., & Blake, R. (2000). Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(5), 711–720. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11054914 doi: 10.1162/089892900562417
  • Hahn, C. A., O’Toole, A. J., & Phillips, P. J. (2016). Dissecting the time course of person recognition in natural viewing environments. British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953), 107(1), 117–134. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12125
  • Hill, H., Jinno, Y., & Johnston, A. (2003). Comparing solid-body with point-light animations. Perception, 32(5), 561–566. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12854642 doi: 10.1068/p3435
  • Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14(2), 201–211. doi: 10.3758/BF03212378
  • Johnson, K. L., & Shiffrar, M. (2013). People watching: Social perceptual, and neurophysiological studies of body perception. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Kao, D., & Harrell, D. F. (2015). Exploring the impact of role model avatars on game experience in educational games. In Proceedings of the 2015 annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play – CHI PLAY “15 (pp. 571–576). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/2793107.2810291
  • Knappmeyer, B., Thornton, I. M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2003). The use of facial motion and facial form during the processing of identity. Vision Research, 43(18), 1921–1936. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12831755 doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00236-0
  • Knoblich, G., Thornton, I. M., Grosjean, F., & Shiffrar, M. (2006). Human body perception from the inside Out. USA: OUP. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=iRkCDYXRRX0C&pgis=1
  • Kozlowski, L. T., & Cutting, J. E. (1977). Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception & Psychophysics, 21(6), 575–580. doi: 10.3758/BF03198740
  • Lander, K., & Butcher, N. (2015). Independence of face identity and expression processing: Exploring the role of motion. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 255. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00255
  • Lander, K., Christie, F., & Bruce, V. (1999). The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces. Memory & Cognition, 27(6), 974–985. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10586574 doi: 10.3758/BF03201228
  • Lange, J., & Lappe, M. (2006). A model of biological motion perception from configural form cues. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 26(11), 2894–2906. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4915-05.2006
  • Liu, C. H., Seetzen, H., Burton, A. M., & Chaudhuri, A. (2003). Face recognition is robust with incongruent image resolution: Relationship to security video images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9(1), 33–41. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12710836
  • Loula, F., Prasad, S., Harber, K., & Shiffrar, M. (2005). Recognizing people from their movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 210–220. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.210
  • Maguinness, C., & Newell, F. N. (2014). Motion facilitates face perception across changes in viewpoint and expression in older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(6), 2266–2280. doi: 10.1037/a0038124
  • Maguinness, C., & Newell, F. N. (2015). Non-rigid, but not rigid, motion interferes with the processing of structural face information in developmental prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 70, 281–295. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.038
  • Mather, G., Pavan, A., Bellacosa Marotti, R., Campana, G., & Casco, C. (2013). Interactions between motion and form processing in the human visual system. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 7, 65. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2013.00065
  • McLeod, P. (1996). Preserved and impaired detection of structure from motion by a “Motion-blind” patient. Visual Cognition, 3(4), 363–392. doi:10.1080/135062896395634
  • Newell, F. N., & Findlay, J. M. (1997). The effect of depth rotation on object identification. Perception, 26(10), 1231–1257. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9604061 doi: 10.1068/p261231
  • Newell, F. N., Wallraven, C., & Huber, S. (2004). The role of characteristic motion in object categorization. Journal of Vision, 4(2), 118–129. doi: 10.1167/4.2.5
  • Oram, M. W., & Perrett, D. I. (1996). Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal Polysensory area (STPa) of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76(1), 109–129. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8836213
  • O’Toole, A. J., Roark, D. A., & Abdi, H. (2002). Recognizing moving faces: a psychological and neural synthesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 261–266. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12039608 doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01908-3
  • Panayiotopoulos, T., Gratch, J., Aylett, R., Ballin, D., Olivier, P., & Rist, T. (Eds.). (2005). Intelligent virtual agents (Vol. 3661). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/11550617
  • Pike, G. E., Kemp, R. I., Towell, N. A., & Phillips, K. C. (1997). Recognizing moving faces: The relative contribution of motion and perspective view information. Visual Cognition, 4, 409–437. doi:10.1080/713756769
  • Pilz, K. S., Bülthoff, H. H., & Vuong, Q. C. (2009). Learning influences the encoding of static and dynamic faces and their recognition across different spatial frequencies. Visual Cognition, 17(5), 716–735. doi: 10.1080/13506280802340588
  • Pilz, K. S., Thornton, I. M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2006). A search advantage for faces learned in motion. Experimental Brain Research, 171(4), 436–447. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0283-8
  • Pilz, K. S., Vuong, Q. C., Bülthoff, H. H., & Thornton, I. M. (2011). Walk this way: Approaching bodies can influence the processing of faces. Cognition, 118(1), 17–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.004
  • Pitcher, D., Dilks, D. D., Saxe, R. R., Triantafyllou, C., & Kanwisher, N. (2011). Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions. NeuroImage, 56(4), 2356–2363. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.067
  • Pollick, F. E., Kay, J. W., Heim, K., & Stringer, R. (2005). Gender recognition from point-light walkers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1247–1265. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1247
  • Powell, W. A., Corbett, N., & Powell, V. (2016). Creative technologies for multidisciplinary applications. A. M. Connor & S. Marks (Eds.). IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0016-2
  • Prins, N., & Kingdom, F. A. A. (2009). Palamedes: Matlab routines for analyzing psychophysical data.
  • Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154. doi: 10.1080/713752551
  • Rice, A., Phillips, P. J., & O’Toole, A. (2013). The role of the face and body in unfamiliar person identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(6), 761–768. doi: 10.1002/acp.2969
  • Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Matelli, M., Bettinardi, V., Paulesu, E., Perani, D., & Fazio, F. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution. Experimental Brain Research, 111(2), 246–252. doi: 10.1007/BF00227301
  • Roark, D. A., O’Toole, A. J., Abdi, H., & Barrett, S. E. (2006). Learning the moves: The effect of familiarity and facial motion on person recognition across large changes in viewing format. Perception, 35(6), 761–773. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16836043 doi: 10.1068/p5503
  • Robbins, R. A., & Coltheart, M. (2015). The relative importance of heads, bodies, and movement to person recognition across development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 138, 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.04.006
  • Saygin, A. P., Wilson, S. M., Hagler, D. J., Bates, E., & Sereno, M. I. (2004). Point-light biological motion perception activates human premotor cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 24(27), 6181–6188. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0504-04.2004
  • Schultz, J., Brockhaus, M., Bülthoff, H. H., & Pilz, K. S. (2013). What the human brain likes about facial motion. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 23(5), 1167–1178. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs106
  • Schultz, J., & Pilz, K. S. (2009). Natural facial motion enhances cortical responses to faces. Experimental Brain Research, 194(3), 465–475. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1721-9
  • Simhi, N., & Yovel, G. (2016). The contribution of the body and motion to whole person recognition. Vision Research, 122, 12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.02.003
  • Spanlang, B., Navarro, X., Normand, J.-M., Kishore, S., Pizarro, R., & Slater, M. (2013). Real time whole body motion mapping for avatars and robots. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology – VRST “13 (p. 175). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/2503713.2503747
  • Spencer, J. M. Y., Sekuler, A. B., Bennett, P. J., Giese, M. A., & Pilz, K. S. (2016). Effects of aging on identifying emotions conveyed by point-light walkers. Psychology and Aging. doi: 10.1037/a0040009
  • Stone, J. V. (1998). Object recognition using spatiotemporal signatures. Vision Research, 38(7), 947–951. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9666977 doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00301-5
  • Stone, J. V. (1999). Object recognition: View-specificity and motion-specificity. Vision Research, 39(24), 4032–4044. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10748936 doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00123-6
  • Thompson, J., & Parasuraman, R. (2012). Attention, biological motion, and action recognition. NeuroImage, 59(1), 4–13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.044
  • Thornton, I. M. (2006). Biological motion: Point-light walkers and beyond. In G. Knoblich, I. M. Thornton, F. Grosjean, & M. Shiffrar (Eds.), Human body perception from the inside out (pp. 271–303). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Thornton, I. M., & Kourtzi, Z. (2002). A matching advantage for dynamic human faces. Perception, 31(1), 113–132. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11922118 doi: 10.1068/p3300
  • Troje, N. F. (2002). Decomposing biological motion: A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. Journal of Vision, 2(5), 371–387. doi: 10.1167/2.5.2
  • Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.) (Analysis o.). MIT Press. Retrieved from http://www.oalib.com/references/14583922
  • Vaina, L. M., Lemay, M., Bienfang, D. C., Choi, A. Y., & Nakayama, K. (1990). Intact “biological motion” and “structure from motion” perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: A case study. Visual neuroscience, 5(04), 353–369. doi:10.1017/S0952523800000444
  • Vanrie, J., & Verfaillie, K. (2004). Perception of biological motion: A stimulus set of human point-light actions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 625–629. doi: 10.3758/BF03206542
  • Vuong, Q. C., Friedman, A., & Plante, C. (2009). Modulation of viewpoint effects in object recognition by shape and motion cues. Perception, 38(11), 1628–1648. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20120262 doi: 10.1068/p6430
  • Wallraven, C., Breidt, M., Cunningham, D. W., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2008). Evaluating the perceptual realism of animated facial expressions. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 4(4), 1–20. doi: 10.1145/1278760.1278764
  • Yovel, G., & O’Toole, A. J. (2016). Recognizing people in motion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(5), 383–395. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.02.005

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.