835
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Natural variability is essential to learning new faces

, , &
Pages 470-476 | Received 27 Jun 2016, Accepted 09 Sep 2016, Published online: 02 Nov 2016

References

  • Adini, Y., Moses, Y., & Ullman, S. (1997). Face recognition: The problem of compensating for changes in illumination direction. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19(7), 721–732. doi: 10.1109/34.598229
  • Andrews, S., Jenkins, R., Cursiter, H., & Burton, A. M. (2015). Telling faces together: Learning new faces through exposure to multiple instances. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(10), 2041–2050. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.1003949
  • Bonner, L., Burton, A. M., & Bruce, V. (2003). Getting to know you: How we learn new faces. Visual Cognition, 10(5), 527–536. doi: 10.1080/13506280244000168
  • Bruce, V. (1994). Stability from variation: The case of face recognition. The M.D. vernon memorial lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 47(1), 5–28. doi: 10.1080/14640749408401141
  • Bruce, V., Henderson, Z., Greenwood, K., Hancock, P. J. B., Burton, A. M., & Miller, P. (1999). Verification of face identities from images captured on video. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5(4), 339–360.
  • Bruce, V., & Langton, S. (1994). The use of pigmentation and shading information in recognising the sex and identities of faces. Perception, 23, 803–822. doi: 10.1068/p230803
  • Burton, A. M. (2013). Why has research in face recognition progressed so slowly? The importance of variability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(8), 1467–1485. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.800125
  • Burton, A. M., Jenkins, R., Hancock, P. J. B., & White, D. (2005). Robust representations for face recognition: The power of averages. Cognitive Psychology, 51(3), 256–284. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.06.003
  • Burton, A. M., Wilson, S., Cowan, M., & Bruce, V. (1999). Face recognition in poor-quality video: Evidence from security surveillance. Psychological Science, 10(3), 243–248. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00144
  • Clutterbuck, R., & Johnston, R. A. (2005). Demonstrating how unfamiliar faces become familiar using a face matching task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17(1), 97–116. doi: 10.1080/09541440340000439
  • Galper, R. E. (1970). Recognition of faces in photographic negative. Psychonomic Science, 19(4), 207–208. doi: 10.3758/BF03328777
  • Gilad, S., Meng, M., & Sinha, P. (2009). Role of ordinal contrast relationships in face encoding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 5353–5358. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812396106
  • Hancock, P. J. B., Bruce, V., & Burton, A. M. (2000). Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(9), 330–337. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01519-9
  • Hussain, Z., Sekuler, A. B., & Bennett, P. J. (2009). Perceptual learning modifies inversion effects for faces and textures. Vision Research, 49(18), 2273–2284. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.06.014
  • Jenkins, R., & Burton, A. M. (2008). 100% accuracy in automatic face recognition. Science, 319(5862), 435. doi: 10.1126/science.1149656
  • Jenkins, R., White, D., Van Montfort, X., & Burton, A. M. (2011). Variability in photos of the same face. Cognition, 121(3), 313–323. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.001
  • Johnston, R. A., & Edmonds, A. J. (2009). Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: A review. Memory, 17(5), 577–596. doi: 10.1080/09658210902976969
  • Laguesse, R., Dormal, G., Biervoye, a., Kuefner, D., & Rossion, B. (2012). Extensive visual training in adulthood significantly reduces the face inversion effect. Journal of Vision, 12(10), 14. doi: 10.1167/12.10.14
  • Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 255–260. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01903-4
  • Maurer, D., & Werker, J. F. (2014). Perceptual narrowing during infancy: A comparison of language and faces. Developmental Psychobiology, 56(2), 154–178. doi: 10.1002/dev.21177
  • Murphy, J., Ipser, A., Gaigg, S. B., & Cook, R. (2015). Exemplar variance supports robust learning of facial identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(3), 577–581.
  • Pascalis, O., de Haan, M., & Nelson, C. A. (2002). Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life? Science, 296(5571), 1321–1323. doi: 10.1126/science.1070223
  • Pascalis, O., Scott, L. S., Kelly, D. J., Shannon, R. W., Nicholson, E., Coleman, M., & Nelson, C. A. (2005). Plasticity of face processing in infancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(14), 5297–5300. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406627102
  • Ritchie, K. L., & Burton, A. M. (in press). Learning faces from variability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
  • Robbins, R. A., & McKone, E. (2003). Can holistic processing be learned for inverted faces? Cognition, 88(1), 79–107. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00020-9
  • Russell, R., Biederman, I., Nederhouser, M., & Sinha, P. (2007). The utility of surface reflectance for the recognition of upright and inverted faces. Vision Research, 47(2), 157–165. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.002
  • Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139–156. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.2.139
  • Sormaz, M., Andrews, T. J., & Young, A. W. (2013). Contrast negation and the importance of the eye region for holistic representations of facial identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1667–1677.
  • Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7(1), 49–63. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(84)80022-3
  • Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 141–145. doi: 10.1037/h0027474
  • Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16(6), 747–759. doi: 10.1068/p160747

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.