The spatially global control of attentional target selection in visual search

References

• Adamo, M., Pun, C., & Ferber, S. (2010). Multiple attentional control settings influence late attentional selection but do not provide an early attentional filter. Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 102–110. doi: 10.1080/17588921003646149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamo, M., Pun, C., Pratt, J., & Ferber, S. (2008). Your divided attention, please! The maintenance of multiple attentional control sets over distinct regions in space. Cognition, 107, 295–303. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamo, M., Wozny, S., Pratt, J., & Ferber, S. (2010). Parallel, independent attentional control settings for colors and shapes. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 1730–1735. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.7.1730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, S. K., Fuchs, S., & Müller, M. M. (2011). Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 238–246. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. A., & Folk, C. L. (2012). Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: Evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1183–1198. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0325-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, G. M., Heinke, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2010). Featural guidance in conjunction search: The contrast between orientation and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1108–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, W., & Egeth, H. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485–496. doi: 10.3758/BF03205306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, V., Hollingworth, A., & Luck, S. (2012). Simultaneous control of attention by multiple working memory representations. Psychological Science, 23, 887–898. doi: 10.1177/0956797612439068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, M. W., Ravizza, S. M., & Peltier, C. (2015). An inability to set independent attentional control settings by hemifield. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 77, 2640–2652. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0964-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belopolsky, A. V., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). What is top-down about contingent capture? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 326–341. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.2.326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berggren, N., & Eimer, M. (2016). The guidance of spatial attention during visual search for color combinations and color configurations.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1282–1296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmel, T., & Lamy, D. (2014). The same-location cost is unrelated to attentional settings: An object-updating account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1465–1478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco, M., Ponte, D., Rechea, C., & Sampedro, M. J. (1998). “Transient structures”: The effect of practice and distractor grouping on within-dimension conjunction searches. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 1243–1258. doi: 10.3758/BF03206173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dombrowe, I., Donk, M., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2011). The costs of switching attentional sets. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 2481–2488. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0198-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. (1992). Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 578–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M. (1996). The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 225–234. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(96)95711-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eimer, M. (2014). The neural basis of attentional control in visual search. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 526–535. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M. (2015). EPS Mid-Career Award 2014: The control of attention in visual search: Cognitive and neural mechanisms. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 2437–2463. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1065283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M., & Kiss, M. (2008). Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1423–1433. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M., & Kiss, M. (2010). Top-down search strategies determine attentional capture in visual search: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 951–962. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.4.951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M., Kiss, M., Press, C., & Sauter, D. (2009). The roles of feature-specific task set and bottom-up salience in attentional capture: An ERP study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1316–1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubert, A., & Eimer, M. (2016). All set, indeed! N2pc components reveal simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colours. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1215–1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, M., Costa, A., & Humphreys, G. W. (2010). The size of an attentional window affects working memory guidance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 963–972. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.4.963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillyard, S. A., & Münte, T. F. (1984). Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 185–198. doi: 10.3758/BF03202679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodsoll, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2001). Driving attention with the top down: The relative contribution of target templates to the linear separability effect in the size dimension. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 918–926. doi: 10.3758/BF03194447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. (2009). Matching of visual input to only one item at any one time. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 73, 317–326. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0157-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irons, J. L., Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2012). All set! Evidence of simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 758–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irons, J. L., & Remington, R. W. (2013). Can attentional control settings be maintained for two color-location conjunctions? Evidence from an RSVP task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 862–875. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0439-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolicœur, P., Brisson, B., & Robitaille, N. (2008). Dissociation of the N2pc and sustained posterior contralateral negativity in a choice response task. Brain Research, 1215, 160–172. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss, M., Grubert, A., & Eimer, M. (2013). Top-down task sets for combined features: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for two stages in attentional object selection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 216–228. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0391-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leblanc, É, Prime, D., & Jolicoeur, P. (2008). Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 657–671. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lien, M., Ruthruff, E., Goodin, Z., & Remington, R. (2008). Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: Converging evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 509–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnell, K. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2001). Spatially parallel processing of within-dimension conjunctions. Perception, 30, 49–60. doi: 10.1068/p2800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnell, K. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Visual search within and across dimensions: A case for within-dimension grouping. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 115–135. doi: 10.1348/000712602162472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1000–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Trujillo, J. C., & Treue, S. (2004). Feature-based attention increases the selectivity of population responses in primate visual cortex. Current Biology, 14, 744–751. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.04.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazza, V., Turatto, M., Umiltà, C., & Eimer, M. (2007). Attentional selection and identification of visual objects are reflected by distinct electrophysiological responses. Experimental Brain Research, 181, 531–536. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1002-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menneer, T., Cave, K., & Donnelly, N. (2009). The cost of search for multiple targets: Effects of practice and target similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 125–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K. S., & Weissman, D. H. (2010). Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: Evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1495–1509. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nako, R., Wu, R., & Eimer, M. (2014). Rapid guidance of visual search by object categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 50–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N. L., Peters, J., Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2011). Different states in visual working memory: When it guides attention and when it does not. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 327–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrott, S. E., Levinthal, B. R., & Franconeri, S. L. (2010). Complex attentional control settings. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2297–2304. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.520085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan, P. T., & Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size: An examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 455–472. doi: 10.3758/BF03203039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saenz, M., Buracas, G. T., & Boynton, G. M. (2002). Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 631–632. doi: 10.1038/nn876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serences, J. T., & Boynton, G. M. (2007). Feature-based attentional modulations in the absence of direct visual stimulation. Neuron, 55, 301–312. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, M., Menneer, T., Cave, K., Donnelly, N., & Rayner, K. (2011). Search for multiple targets of different colours: Misguided eye movements reveal a reduction of colour selectivity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 971–982. doi: 10.1002/acp.1790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748–751. doi: 10.1038/nature02447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202–238. doi: 10.3758/BF03200774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Guided Search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems (pp. 99–119). New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 495–501. doi: 10.1038/nrn1411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Yu, K. P., Stewart, M. I., Shorter, A. D., Friedman-Hill, S. R., & Cave, K. R. (1990). Limitations on the parallel guidance of visual search: Color × Color and Orientation × Orientation conjunctions.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 879–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman, G. W., & Luck, S. J. (1999). Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature, 400, 867–869. doi: 10.1038/23698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., & Luck, S. J. (2009). Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 24–25. doi: 10.1038/nn.2223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar