Time-based selection in complex displays: Visual marking does not occur in Multi-Element Asynchronous Dynamic (MAD) search

References

• Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science, 14(5), 427–432. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.01458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agter, F., & Donk, M. (2005). Prioritized selection in visual search through onset capture and color inhibition: Evidence from a probe-dot detection-task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(4), 722–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belopolsky, A. V., Theeuwes, J., & Kramer, A. F. (2005). Prioritization by transients in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1), 93–99. doi: 10.3758/BF03196352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. J., Hulleman, J., Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2006). Is it impossible to inhibit isoluminant items or does it simply take longer? Evidence from preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 290–300. doi: 10.3758/BF03193676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. J., Humphreys, G. W., Watson, D. G., & Hulleman, J. (2005). Revisiting preview search at isoluminance: New onsets are not necessary for the preview advantage. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(7), 1214–1228. doi: 10.3758/BF03193554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. M., & Wolfe, J. M. (1996). Just say no: How are visual searches terminated when there is no target present? Cognitive Psychology, 30, 39–78. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donk, M. (2006). The preview benefit: Visual marking, feature-based inhibition, temporal segregation, or onset capture? Visual Cognition, 14(4-8), 736–748. doi: 10.1080/13506280500193230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donk, M. (2017). Subset selective search on the basis of color and preview. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 79(1), 85–99. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1211-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(5), 891–900. doi: 10.3758/BF03194445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2003). Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(8), 1231–1242. doi: 10.3758/BF03194848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donk, M., & Verburg, R. C. (2004). Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: Evidence against visual marking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(2), 282–288. doi: 10.3758/BF03196571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dube, B., Basciano, A., Emrich, S.M., & Al-Aidroos, N. (2016). Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 78(5), 1232–1244. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1105-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emrich, S. M., Al-Aidroos, N., Pratt, J., & Ferber, S. (2010). Finding memory in search: The effect of visual working memory load on visualsearch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1457–1466. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.483768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emrich, S. M., Ruppel, J. D. N., Al-Aidroos, N., Pratt, J., & Ferber, S. (2008). Out with the old: Inhibition of old items in a preview search is Working Memory in Preview Search Limited. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1552–1557. doi: 10.3758/PP.70.8.1552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenske, M. J., Raymond, J. E., & Kunar, M. A. (2004). The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 1055–1061. doi: 10.3758/BF03196736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franconeri, S. L., & Simons, D. J. (2003). Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(7), 999–1010. doi: 10.3758/BF03194829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. W., Kyllinsbæk, S., Watson, D. G., Olivers, C. N. L., Law, I., & Paulson, O. (2004). Parieto-occipital areas involved in efficient filtering in search: A time course analysis of visual marking using behavioural and functional imaging procedures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 610–635. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., Chun, M. M., & Marks, L. E. (2002a). Visual marking: Dissociating effects of new and old set size. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 293–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., Chun, M. M., & Marks, L. E. (2002b). Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(3), 717–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunar, M. A., & Humphreys, G. W. (2006). Object-based inhibitory priming in preview search: Evidence from the “top-up” procedure. Memory & Cognition, 34(3), 459–474. doi: 10.3758/BF03193571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G. W., & Smith, K. J. (2003a). History matters: The preview benefit in search is not onset capture. Psychological Science, 14(2), 181–185. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G. W., & Smith, K. J. (2003b). Visual change with moving displays; More evidence for color feature map inhibition during preview search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(4), 779–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G. W., Smith, K. J., & Hulleman, J. (2003). What is marked in visual marking?: Evidence for effects of configuration in preview search. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 982–996. doi: 10.3758/BF03194828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G. W., Smith, K. J., & Watson, D. G. (2003). When a re-appearance is old news: Visual marking survives occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 185–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunar, M. A., Shapiro, K. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2006). Top-up search and the attentional blink: A two-stage account of the preview effect in search. Visual Cognition, 13(6), 677–699. doi: 10.1080/13506280500463195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunar, M. A., & Watson, D. G. (2011). Visual search in a Multi-Element Asynchronous Dynamic (MAD) world. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(4), 1017–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunar, M. A., & Watson, D. G. (2014). When are abrupt onsets found efficiently in complex visual search?: Evidence from Multi-Element Asynchronous Dynamic Search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 232–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, P., Driver, J., & Crisp, J. (1988). Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel. Nature, 332, 154–155. doi: 10.1038/332154a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Mühlenen, A., Watson, D. G. & Gunnell, D. O. A. (2013). Blink and you won't miss it: The preview benefit in visual marking survives internally generated eyeblinks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1279–1290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down, limited-capacity inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(1), 22–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N. L., Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Visual marking of locations and feature maps: Evidence from within-dimension defined conjunctions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 52, 679–715. doi: 10.1080/713755836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osugi, T., Kumada, T., & Kawahara, J. (2010). Visual marking survives graphical change if meaning is retained. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(8), 2144–2156. doi: 10.3758/BF03196690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, Y., Olivers, C., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 59–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, Y., Olivers, C. N. L., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). Selecting from dynamic environments: Attention distinguishes between blinking and moving. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 166–178. doi: 10.3758/PP.70.1.166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., & Atchley, P. (1998). Visual marking of old objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 130–134. doi: 10.3758/BF03209468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. G. (2001). Visual marking in moving displays: Feature-based inhibition is not necessary. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 63(1), 74–84. doi: 10.3758/BF03200504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by topdown attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104(1), 90–122. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1998). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 946–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 471–481. doi: 10.3758/BF03212099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Visual marking and visual change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 379–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. G., & Kunar, M. A. (2010). Visual marking and change blindness: Moving occluders and transient masks neutralize shape changes to ignored objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1391–1405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual Search. In H. Pashler (Eds.), Attention (Vol. 1, pp. 13–73). London, UK: University College London Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yantis, S., & Gibson, B. (1994). Object continuity in apparent motion and attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 182–204. doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.48.2.182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10(5), 601–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zupan, Z., Watson, D. G., & Blagrove, E. (2015). Inhibition in time-based visual selection: Strategic or by default? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 1442–1461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar