Which kind of attention is captured by cues with the relative target colour?

References

• Anderson, B. A., & Folk, C. L. (2012). Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: Evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(5), 1–16. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0292-1
   Google Scholar
• Becker, S. I. (2010). The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(2), 247–265. doi:10.1037/A0018808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. I. (2013). Simply shapely: Relative, not absolute shapes are primed in pop-out search. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 75(5), 845–861. doi:10.3758/S13414-013-0433-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. I., Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2010). The role of relational information in contingent capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1460–1476. doi:10.1037/A0020370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. I., Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2013). Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations. Psychological Science, 24(5), 634–647. doi:10.1177/0956797612458528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. I., Harris, A. M., York, A., & Choi, J. K. (in press). Conjunction search is relational: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belopolsky, A. V., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). What is top-down about contingent capture? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(2), 326–341. doi:10.3758/App.72.2.326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bravo, M. J., & Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 51(5), 465–472. doi:10.3758/Bf03211642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ögmen, H. (2006). Visual masking: Time slices through conscious and unconscious vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96(3), 433–458. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Beyond the search surface - visual-search and attentional engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 18(2), 578–588. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.2.578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M., Kiss, M., Press, C., & Sauter, D. (2009). The roles of feature-specific task set and bottom-up salience in attentional capture: An ERP study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1316–1328. doi:10.1037/a0015872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 847–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting Is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1030–1044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franz, V. H., & Loftus, G. R. (2012). Standard errors and confidence intervals in within-subjects designs: Generalizing Loftus and Masson (1994) and avoiding the biases of alternative accounts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(3), 395–404. doi:10.3758/S13423-012-0230-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspelin, N., Leonard, C. J., & Luck, S. J. (2015). Direct evidence for active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant sensory inputs. Psychological Science, 26(11), 1740–1750. doi:10.1177/0956797615597913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspelin, N., Leonard, C. J., & Luck, S. J. (2017). Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 79(1), 45–62. doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1209-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. M., Remington, R. W., & Becker, S. I. (2013). Feature specificity in attentional capture by size and color. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 1–15. doi: Artn1210.1167/13.3.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodsoll, J. P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2001). Driving attention with the top down: The relative contribution of target templates to the linear separability effect in the size dimension. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(5), 918–926. doi:10.3758/Bf03194447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodsoll, J. P., Humphreys, G. W., & Braithwaite, J. J. (2006). Dissociating the effects of similarity, salience, and top-down processes in search for linearly separable size targets. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(4), 558–570. doi:10.3758/Bf03208758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerzel, D., Zarian, L., & Souto, D. (2009). Involuntary cueing effects on accuracy measures: Stimulus and task dependence. Journal of Vision, 9(11), 16, 1534–7362. doi:10.1167/9.11.16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., & Pelli, D. (2007). What’s new in psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36, 14–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamy, D. F., Leber, A., & Egeth, H. E. (2004). Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(6), 1019–1031. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.30.6.1019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lien, M. C., Ruthruff, E., & Cornett, L. (2010). Attentional capture by singletons is contingent on top-down control settings: Evidence from electrophysiological measures. Visual Cognition, 18(5), 682–727. doi:10.1080/13506280903000040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathans, J. (1999). The evolution and physiology of human color vision: Insights from molecular genetic studies of visual pigments. Neuron, 24(2), 299–312. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80845-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navalpakkam, V., & Itti, L. (2007). Search goal tunes visual features optimally. Neuron, 53(4), 605–617. doi:10.1016/J.Neuron.2007.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neitz, J., & Neitz, M. (2008). Colour vision: The wonder of hue. Current Biology, 18(16), R700–R702. doi:10.1016/J.Cub.2008.06.062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 437–442. doi:10.1163/156856897x00366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prinzmetal, W., Ha, R., & Khani, A. (2010). The mechanisms of involuntary attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(2), 255–267. doi:10.1037/A0017600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinzmetal, W., & Landau, A. N. (2010). Dissecting spatial visual attention. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Tutorials in visual cognition (pp. 43–66). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prinzmetal, W., McCool, C., & Park, S. (2005). Attention: Reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(1), 73–92. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinzmetal, W., Park, S., & Garrett, R. (2005). Involuntary attention and identification accuracy. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(8), 1344–1353. doi:10.3758/Bf03193639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinzmetal, W., Taylor, J. A., Myers, L. B., & Nguyen-Espino, J. (2011). Contingent capture and inhibition of return: A comparison of mechanisms. Experimental Brain Research, 214(1), 47–60. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2805-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinzmetal, W., Zvinyatskovskiy, A., Gutierrez, P., & Dilem, L. (2009). Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: The effect of perceptual difficulty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(2), 352–369. doi:10.1080/17470210801954892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2010). Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(6), 1455–1470. doi:10.3758/APP.72.6.1455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2013a). Active suppression after involuntary capture of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(2), 296–301. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0353-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2013b). How the brain prevents and terminates shifts of attention. In G. R. Mangun (Ed.), Cognitive electrophysiology of attention (pp. 16–29). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Schönhammer, J. G., Grubert, A., Kerzel, D., & Becker, S. I. (2016). Attentional guidance by relative features: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Psychophysiology, 53(6), 1074–1083. doi:10.1111/psyp.12645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scolari, M., & Serences, J. T. (2010). Basing perceptual decisions on the most informative sensory neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(4), 2266–2273. doi:10.1152/jn.00273.2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (2014). Spatial orienting and attentional capture. In A. C. Nobre, & S. Kastner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of attention (pp. 231–252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Treue, S., & Martinez Trujillo, J. C. (1999). Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature, 399(6736), 575–579. doi:10.1038/21176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0 A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2), 202–238. doi: 10.3758/BF03200774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Guided search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 99–119). New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar