The concurrent encoding of viewpoint-invariant and viewpoint-dependent information in visual object recognition

References

• Andresen, D. R., Vinberg, J., & Grill-Spector, K. (2009). The representation of object viewpoint in human visual cortex. Neuroimage, 45(2), 522–536. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bart, E., & Hegdé, J. (2012). Invariant recognition of visual objects: Some emerging computational principles. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6, 60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biederman, I. (1985). Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 32, 29–73. doi: 10.1016/0734-189X(85)90002-7
   Google Scholar
• Biederman, I. (2000). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: A review of recent research and theory. Spatial Vision, 13(2–3), 241–253. doi: 10.1163/156856800741063
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biederman, I., & Bar, M. (2000). Differing views on views: Response to Hayward and Tarr (2000). Vision Research, 40, 3901–3905. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00180-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(6), 1162–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(6), 1506–1514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, E. E., & Wojan, T. J. (2000). Differences in the coding of spatial relations in face identification and basic-level object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(2), 470–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corballis, M. C., & McLaren, R. (1984). Winding one’s Ps and Qs: Mental rotation and mirror-image discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 318–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, S., & Intrator, N. (2003). Towards structural systematicity in distributed, statically bound visual representations. Cognitive Science, 27, 73–109. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2701_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., Allport, D. A., Humphreys, G. W., & Collis, J. (1989). Varieties of object constancy. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 41(4), 775–796. doi: 10.1080/14640748908402393
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foster, D. H., & Gilson, S. J. (2002). Recognizing novel three-dimensional objects by summing signals from parts and views. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269, 1939–1947. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier, I., Hayward, W. G., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (2002). BOLD activity during mental rotation and viewpoint-dependent object recognition. Neuron, 34(1), 161–171. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00622-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Moylan, J., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). The fusiform “face area” is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(3), 495–504. doi: 10.1162/089892900562165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm, J. P., & McMullen, P. A. (1998). Effects of orientation on the identification of rotated objects depend on the level of identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(2), 413–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. Y., & Burgund, E. D. (2012). Neural adaptation across viewpoint and exemplar in fusiform cortex. Brain and Cognition, 80(1), 33–44. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, W. G., & Tarr, M. J. (2000). Differing views on views: Comments on Biederman and bar (1999). Vision Research, 40(28), 3895–3899. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00179-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, W. G., & Tarr, M. J. (2005). High-Level vision. In R. Goldstone & K. Lamberts (Eds.), Handbook of cognition (pp. 48–70). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, W. G., Tarr, M. J., & Corderoy, A. K. (1999). Recognizing silhouettes and shaded images across depth rotation. Perception, 28, 1197–1215. doi: 10.1068/p2971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, W. G., & Williams, P. (2000). Viewpoint dependence and object discriminability. Psychological Science, 11(1), 7–12. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel, J. E. (2001). Complementary solutions to the binding problem in vision: Implications for shape perception and object recognition. Visual Cognition, 8(3–5), 489–517. doi: 10.1080/13506280143000214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel, J. E., & Stankiewicz, B. J. (1996). Categorical relations in shape perception. Spatial Vision, 10, 201–236. doi: 10.1163/156856896X00141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1984). Routes to object constancy: Implications from neurological impairments of object constancy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A – Human Experimental Psychology, 36, 385–415. doi: 10.1080/14640748408402169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289–303. doi: 10.3758/BF03202498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolicoeur, P. (1990). Identification of disoriented objects: A dual-systems theory. Mind & Language, 5(4), 387–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1990.tb00170.x
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1985). Cognitive coordinate systems: Accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. Psychological Review, 92(2), 137–172. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.92.2.137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, R., & Humphreys, G. W. (1996). View specificity in object processing: Evidence from picture matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(2), 395–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, R., & Humphreys, G. W. (1998). View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 60(6), 1052–1066. doi: 10.3758/BF03211939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. doi: 10.1038/nature14539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leek, E. C., Atherton, C. J., & Thierry, G. (2007). Computational mechanisms of object constancy for visual recognition revealed by event-related potentials. Vision Research, 47(5), 706–713. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.10.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leek, E. C., & Johnston, S. J. (2006). A polarity effect in misoriented object recognition: The role of polar features in the computation of orientation-invariant shape representations. Visual Cognition, 13(5), 573–600. doi: 10.1080/13506280544000048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Bülthoff, H. H., & Poggio, T. (1994). View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Current Biology, 4(5), 401–414. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00089-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marr, D., & Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 200, 269–294. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1978.0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J., Bub, D. N., & Breuer, A. T. (2011). “Priming of reach and grasp actions by handled objects”: Correction to Masson et al. (2011). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(6), 1688–1688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milivojevic, B. (2012). Object recognition can be viewpoint dependent or invariant – it’s just a matter of time and task. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6, 27. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navolio, N., Lemaitre, G., Forget, A., & Heller, L. M. (2016). The egocentric nature of action-sound associations. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(February), 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrett, D. I., Oram, M. W., & Ashbridge, E. (1998). Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: An account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformations. Cognition, 67(1,2), 111–145. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00015-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggio, T., & Edelman, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343, 263–266. doi: 10.1038/343263a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyles, J. A., Verstynen, T. D., Schneider, W., & Tarr, M. J. (2013). Explicating the face perception network with White-matter connectivity. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e61611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratan Murty, N. A., & Arun, S. P. (2015). Dynamics of 3D view invariance in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 113(7), 2180–2194. doi: 10.1152/jn.00810.2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion, B., Kung, C.-C., & Tarr, M. J. (2004). Visual expertise with nonface objects leads to competition with the early perceptual processing of faces in the human occipitotemporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101(40), 14521–14526. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405613101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3972.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankiewicz, B. J., Hummel, J. E., & Cooper, E. E. (1998). The role of attention in priming for left–right reflections of object images: Evidence for a dual representation of object shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 732–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takano, Y. (1989). Perception of rotated forms: A theory of information types. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 1–59. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(89)90002-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2(1), 55–82. doi: 10.3758/BF03214412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarr, M. J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(6), 1494–1505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarr, M. J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1999). Object recognition in man, monkey, and machine (Vol. 67, p. 223). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarr, M. J., & Gauthier, I. (1998). Do viewpoint-dependent mechanisms generalize across members of a class? Cognition, 67(1–2), 71–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarr, M. J., Kersten, D., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1998). Why the visual recognition system might encode the effects of illumination. Vision Research, 38(15/16), 2259–2275. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00041-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarr, M. J., & Kriegman, D. J. (2001). What defines a view? Vision Research, 41(15), 1981–2004. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00024-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21(2), 233–282. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(89)90009-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1990). When does human object recognition use a viewer-centered reference frame? Psychological Science, 1(4), 253–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00209.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarr, M. J., Williams, P., Hayward, W. G., & Gauthier, I. (1998). Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent. Nature Neuroscience, 1(4), 275–277. doi: 10.1038/1089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjan, B. S. (2001). Adaptive object representation with hierarchically-distributed memory sites. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 13, 66–72.
   Google Scholar
• Yamins, D. L. K., Hong, H., Cadieu, C. F., Solomon, E. A., Seibert, D., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2014). Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 111(23), 8619–8624. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1403112111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar