Implied between-object actions affect response selection without knowledge about object functionality

References

• Bach, P., Knoblich, G., Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Prinz, W. (2005). Action comprehension: Deriving spatial and functional relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(3), 465–479. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, P., Peelen, M. V., & Tipper, S. P. (2010). On the role of object information in action observation: An fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 20(12), 2798–2809. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkofski, F., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2013). Two action systems in the human brain. Brain and Language, 127(2), 222–229. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghi, A. M., & Riggio, L. (2009). Sentence comprehension and simulation of object temporary, canonical and stable affordances. Brain Research, 1253, 117–128. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghi, A. M., & Riggio, L. (2015). Stable and variable affordances are both automatic and flexible. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 351. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bub, D. N., Masson, M. E., & Cree, G. S. (2008). Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition, 106(1), 27–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buccino, G., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Rodà, F., & Riggio, L. (2009). Broken affordances, broken objects: A TMS study. Neuropsychologia, 47(14), 3074–3078. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, D. T., & Proctor, R. W. (2010). The object-based Simon effect: Grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 853–861. doi: 10.1037/a0019328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, D. T., & Proctor, R. W. (2011). Correspondence effects for objects with opposing left and right protrusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(3), 737–749. doi: 10.1037/a0021934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisek, P. (2007). Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1485), 1585–1599. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1(1), 42–45. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2000). Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology, 91(4), 451–471. doi: 10.1348/000712600161934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1), 20–25. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, C., & Hummel, J. E. (2006). Familiar interacting object pairs are perceptually grouped. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1107–1119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grèzes, J., Armony, J. L., Rowe, J., & Passingham, R. E. (2003). Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 18(4), 928–937. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00042-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grèzes, J., & Decety, J. (2002). Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia, 40(2), 212–222. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00089-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosjean, M., Rosenbaum, D. A., & Elsinger, C. (2001). Timing and reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 256–272. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56(4), 261–268. doi: 10.1007/BF00419656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Fortt, H. (2006). Action relations, semantic relations, and familiarity of spatial position in Balint’s syndrome: Crossover effects on perceptual report and on localization. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6(3), 236–245. doi: 10.3758/CABN.6.3.236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. W., Wulff, M., Yoon, E. Y., & Riddoch, M. J. (2010). Neuropsychological evidence for visual- and motor-based affordance: Effects of reference frame and object–hand congruence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(3), 659–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheson, H., Newman, A. J., Satel, J., & McMullen, P. (2014). Handles of manipulable objects attract covert visual attention: ERP evidence. Brain and Cognition, 86, 17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNair, N. A., & Harris, I. M. (2016). Attention is required for the perceptual integration of action object pairs. Experimental Brain Research, 234(1), 25–37. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4435-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. (2006). The visual brain in action (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2008). Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia, 46(3), 774–785. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osiurak, F. (2014). What neuropsychology tells us about human tool use? The four constraints theory (4CT): mechanics, space, time, and effort. Neuropsychology Review, 24(2), 88–115. doi: 10.1007/s11065-014-9260-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. C., & Ward, R. (2002). SR correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordancc: Time course and specificity. Independence and Integration of Perception and Action, 9(4–5), 540–558.
   Google Scholar
• Riddoch, M. J., Edwards, M. G., Humphreys, G. W., West, R., & Heafield, T. (1998). Visual affordances direct action: Neuropsychological evidence from manual interference. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15(6–8), 645–683. doi: 10.1080/026432998381041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Edwards, S., Baker, T., & Willson, K. (2002). Seeing the action: Neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection. Nature Neuroscience, 6(1), 82–89. doi: 10.1038/nn984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Price, C. J. (1989). Routes to action: Evidence from apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 6(5), 437–454. doi: 10.1080/02643298908253424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2010a). Action relationships concatenate representations of separate objects in the ventral visual system. Neuroimage, 52(4), 1541–1548. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2010b). The one that does, leads: Action relations influence the perceived temporal order of graspable objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(3), 776–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2011a). Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(4), 669–688. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.520086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2011b). Action relations facilitate the identification of briefly-presented objects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(2), 597–612. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0043-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, L., Straulino, E., Castiello, U., & Avenanti, A. (2011). How objects are grasped: The interplay between affordances and end-goals. PLoS ONE, 6(9), e25203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symes, E., Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2005). Dissociating object-based and space-based affordances. Visual Cognition, 12(7), 1337–1361. doi: 10.1080/13506280444000445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thill, S., Caligiore, D., Borghi, A. M., Ziemke, T., & Baldassarre, G. (2013). Theories and computational models of affordance and mirror systems: An integrative review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(3), 491–521. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 830–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2001). The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition, 8(6), 769–800. doi: 10.1080/13506280042000144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vainio, L., Ala-Salomaki, H., Huovilainen, T., Nikkinen, H., Salo, M., Valiaho, J., & Paavilainen, P. (2014). Mug handle affordance and automatic response inhibition: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(9), 1697–1719. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.868007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valyear, K. F., Chapman, C. S., Gallivan, J. P., Mark, R. S., & Culham, J. C. (2011). To use or to move: Goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools. Experimental Brain Research, 212(1), 125–142. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2705-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L. S., Augusteijn, H. E. M., Bakker, M., van Aert, R. C. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulff, M., & Humphreys, G. W. (2015). Effects of broken affordance on visual extinction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 515. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, S., Humphreys, G. W., & Heinke, D. (2015). Implied actions between paired objects lead to affordance selection by inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(4), 1021–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, S., Humphreys, G. W., Mevorach, C., & Heinke, D. (2017). The involvement of the dorsal stream in processing implied actions between paired objects: A TMS study. Neuropsychologia, 95, 240–249. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.12.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, E. Y., Heinke, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Modelling direct perceptual constraints on action selection: The naming and action model (NAM). Visual Cognition, 9(4–5), 615–661. doi: 10.1080/13506280143000601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, E. Y., Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2010). The paired-object affordance effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 812–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar