Dissecting the visual perception of body shape with the Garner selective attention paradigm

References

• Adams, R. B. (2011). The science of social vision. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Algom, D., & Fitousi, D. (2016). Half a century of research on Garner interference and the separability-integrality distinction. Psychol Bull, 142(12), 1352–1383. doi: 10.1037/bul0000072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyle, M. (1975). Bodily communication. Norfolk, UK: Methuen & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A. P., Tipples, J., Burt, D. M., & Young, A. W. (2005). Asymmetric interference between sex and emotion in face perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(7), 1199–1213. doi: 10.3758/BF03193553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aviezer, H., Trope, Y., & Todorov, A. (2012a). Holistic person processing: Faces with bodies tell the whole story. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 20–37. doi: 10.1037/a0027411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aviezer, H., Trope, Y., & Todorov, A. (2012b). Body cues, not facial expressions, discriminate between intense positive and negative emotions. Science, 338(6111), 1225–1229. doi: 10.1126/science.1224313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(5), 395–424. doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(95)00068-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay, C. D., Cutting, J. E., & Kozlowski, L. T. (1978). Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 23(2), 145–152. doi: 10.3758/BF03208295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, M. S., Lee, K. E., Haxby, J. V., & Martin, A. (2002). Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements. Neuron, 34(1), 149–159. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00642-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M., Oron, J., Sadeh, B., & Yovel, G. (2014). An integrated face–body representation in the fusiform gyrus but not the lateral occipital cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(11), 2469–2478. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi: 10.1163/156856897x00357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brandman, T., & Yovel, G. (2014). Bodies are represented as wholes rather than their sum of parts in the occipital-temporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, bhu205. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, V., Ellis, H. D., Gibling, F., & Young, A. (1987). Parallel processing of the sex and familiarity of faces. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 41(4), 510–520. doi: 10.1037/h0084165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77(3), 305–327. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder, A. J., & Young, A. W. (2005). Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(8), 641–651. doi: 10.1038/nrn1724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. (1996). Dissociating face processing skills: Decisions about lip read speech, expression, and identity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 49(2), 295–314. doi:10.1080/713755619 doi: 10.1080/027249896392649
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coulson, M. (2004). Attributing emotion to static body postures: Recognition accuracy, confusions, and viewpoint dependence. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28(2), 117–139. doi: 10.1023/B:JONB.0000023655.25550.be
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Gelder, B. (2016). Emotions and the body. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Gelder, B., Van den Stock, J., Meeren, H. K., Sinke, C. B., Kret, M. E., & Tamietto, M. (2010). Standing up for the body. Recent progress in uncovering the networks involved in the perception of bodies and bodily expressions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(4), 513–527. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, P., & Buunk, B. P. (2001). Sex differences in the jealousy-evoking nature of a rival’s body build. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(5), 335–341. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00070-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing, P. E., Jiang, Y., Shuman, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science, 293(5539), 2470–2473. doi: 10.1126/science.1063414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing, P. E., & Peelen, M. V. (2011). The role of occipitotemporal body-selective regions in person perception. Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(3-4), 186–203. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2011.582945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing, P. E., Peelen, M. V., Wiggett, A. J., & Tew, B. D. (2006). The role of the extrastriate body area in action perception. Social Neuroscience, 1(1), 52–62. doi: 10.1080/17470910600668854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchaine, B., & Yovel, G. (2015). A revised neural framework for face processing. Annual Review of Vision Science, 1, 393–416. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-082114-035518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. (1989). Neuro-cognitive processing of faces and voices. In A. W. Young, H. D. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Face Processing (pp. 207–215). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-87143-5.50017-2
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, C., & Freiwald, W. A. (2015). Whole-agent selectivity within the macaque face-processing system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(47), 14717–14722. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1512378112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2011). A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological Review, 118(2), 247–279. doi: 10.1037/a0022327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Swami, V., & Shah, K. (2006). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio and breast size correlates of ratings of attractiveness and health. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(3), 443–454. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganel, T., & Goshen-Gottstein, Y. (2002). Perceptual integrality of sex and identity of faces: Further evidence for the single-route hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(4), 854–867. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.28.4.854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganel, T., & Goshen-Gottstein, Y. (2004). Effects of familiarity on the perceptual integrality of the identity and expression of faces: The parallel-route hypothesis revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(3), 583–597. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.3.583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, W. R. (1976). Interaction of stimulus dimensions in concept and choice processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8(1), 98–123. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(76)90006-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, W. R. (1983). Asymmetric interactions of stimulus dimensions in perceptual information processing. In T. J. Tighe, & B. E. Shepp (Eds.), Perception, cognition, and development: Interactional analyses (pp. 1–37). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ghuman, A. S., McDaniel, J. R., & Martin, A. (2010). Face adaptation without a face. Current Biology, 20(1), 32–36. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giese, M. A., & Poggio, T. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(3), 179–192. doi: 10.1038/nrn1057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, K. P., Tomiak, G. R., & Kuhl, P. K. (1997). The encoding of rate and talker information during phonetic perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 59(5), 675–692. doi: 10.3758/BF03206015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, E. D., & Blake, R. (2002). Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron, 35(6), 1167–1175. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00897-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafri, A., Trueswell, J. C., & Epstein, R. A. (2017). Neural representations of observed actions generalize across static and dynamic visual input. J Neurosci, 37(11), 3056–3071. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2496-16.2017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harry, B. B., Umla-Runge, K., Lawrence, A. D., Graham, K. S., & Downing, P. E. (2016). Evidence for integrated visual face and body representations in the anterior temporal lobes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(8), 1178–1193. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(6), 223–233. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01482-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. W., Donnelly, N., & Riddoch, M. J. (1993). Expression is computed separately from facial identity, and it is computed separately for moving and static faces: Neuropsychological evidence. Neuropsychologia, 31(2), 173–181. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(93)90045-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. L., Gill, S., Reichman, V., & Tassinary, L. G. (2007). Swagger, sway, and sexuality: Judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 321–334. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. L., & Shiffrar, M. (Eds.). (2012). People watching: Social, perceptual, and neurophysiological studies of body perception. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. L., & Tassinary, L. G. (2005). Perceiving sex directly and indirectly meaning in motion and morphology. Psychological Science, 16(11), 890–897. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01633.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, D., Strnad, L., Seidl, K. N., Kastner, S., & Peelen, M. V. (2014). Whole person-evoked fMRI activity patterns in human fusiform gyrus are accurately modeled by a linear combination of face-and body-evoked activity patterns. Journal of Neurophysiology, 111(1), 82–90. doi: 10.1152/jn.00371.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnadewi, F., & Lipp, O. V. (2011). The processing of invariant and variant face cues in the Garner paradigm. Emotion, 11(3), 563–571. doi: 10.1037/a0021333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoblich, G., Thornton, I. M., Grosjean, M., & Shiffrar, M. (2006). Human body perception from the inside Out. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, L. T., & Cutting, J. E. (1977). Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception & Psychophysics, 21(6), 575–580. doi: 10.3758/BF03198740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, M., Oruç, I., & Barton, J. J. (2012). Facial age after-effects show partial identity invariance and transfer from hands to faces. Cortex, 48(4), 477–486. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lander, K., & Butcher, N. (2015). Independence of face identity and expression processing: Exploring the role of motion. Front Psychol, 6, 255. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Gal, P. M., & & Bruce, V. (2002). Evaluating the independence of sex and expression in judgments of faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(2), 230–243. doi: 10.3758/BF03195789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingnau, A., & Downing, P. E. (2015). The lateral occipitotemporal cortex in action. Trends Cogn Sci, 19(5), 268–277. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. New Brunswick, USA: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90(2), 227–234. doi: 10.1037/h0031564
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minnebusch, D. A., & Daum, I. (2009). Neuropsychological mechanisms of visual face and body perception. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(7), 1133–1144. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullennix, J. W., & Pisoni, D. B. (1990). Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 47(4), 379–390. doi: 10.3758/BF03210878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, A. J., Natu, V., An, X., Rice, A., Ryland, J., & Phillips, P. J. (2014). The neural representation of faces and bodies in motion and at rest. Neuroimage, 91, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelen, M. V., & Downing, P. E. (2005). Selectivity for the human body in the fusiform gyrus. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93(1), 603–608. doi: 10.1152/jn.00513.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelen, M. V., & Downing, P. E. (2007). The neural basis of visual body perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(8), 636–648. doi: 10.1038/nrn2195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitcher, D., Duchaine, B., & Walsh, V. (2014). Combined TMS and FMRI reveal dissociable cortical pathways for dynamic and static face perception. Curr Biol, 24(17), 2066–2070. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, J. R., & Garner, W. (1973). Stimulus configuration in selective attention tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 14(3), 565–569. doi: 10.3758/BF03211198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Quadflieg, S., Flannigan, N., Waiter, G. D., Rossion, B., Wig, G. S., Turk, D. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2011). Stereotype-based modulation of person perception. Neuroimage, 57(2), 549–557. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, A., Phillips, P. J., Natu, V., An, X., & O’Toole, A. J. (2013). Unaware person recognition from the body when face identification fails. Psychological Science, 24, 2235–2243. doi: 10.1177/0956797613492986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., Hall, J. A., DiMatteo, M. R., Rogers, P. L., & Archer, D. (1979). Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS test. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzlose, R. F., Baker, C. I., & Kanwisher, N. (2005). Separate face and body selectivity on the fusiform gyrus. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(47), 11055–11059. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2621-05.2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweinberger, S. R., Burton, A. M., & Kelly, S. W. (1999). Asymmetric dependencies in perceiving identity and emotion: Experiments with morphed faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(6), 1102–1115. doi: 10.3758/BF03207617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweinberger, S. R., & Soukup, G. R. (1998). Asymmetric relationships among perceptions of facial identity, emotion, and facial speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(6), 1748–1765. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 293–307. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, D. (1994). Is thin really beautiful and good? Relationship between waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and female attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(1), 123–132. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90116-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(6), 483–507. doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(95)00074-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturman, D., Stephen, I. D., Mond, J., Stevenson, R. J., & Brooks, K. R. (2017). Independent Aftereffects of Fat and Muscle: Implications for neural encoding, body space representation, and body image disturbance. Scientific Reports, 7, 40392. doi:10.1038/srep40392
   Google Scholar
• Tovée, M. J., Edmonds, L., & Vuong, Q. C. (2012). Categorical perception of human female physical attractiveness and health. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(2), 85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turvey, M. T. (1973). On peripheral and central processes in vision: Inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. Psychological Review, 80(1), 1–52. doi: 10.1037/h0033872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangeneugden, J., Peelen, M. V., Tadin, D., & Battelli, L. (2014). Distinct neural mechanisms for body form and body motion discriminations. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(2), 574–585. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4032-13.2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurm, M. F., & Lingnau, A. (2015). Decoding actions at different levels of abstraction. J Neurosci, 35(20), 7727–7735. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0188-15.2015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. W. (1998). Face and mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. W., & Bruce, V. (2011). Understanding person perception. British Journal of Psychology, 102(4), 959–974. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02045.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. W., Newcombe, F., de Haan, E. H., Small, M., & Hay, D. C. (1993). Face perception after brain injury: Selective impairments affecting identity and expression. Brain : A Journal of Neurology, 116(4), 941–959. doi: 10.1093/brain/116.4.941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yovel, G., & Belin, P. (2013). A unified coding strategy for processing faces and voices. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(6), 263–271. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yovel, G., & O’Toole, A. J. (2016). Recognizing people in motion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(5), 383–395. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar