Response-mediated spatial priming despite perfectly valid target location cues and intervening response events

References

• Ásgeirsson, Á. G., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2011). Episodic retrieval and feature facilitation in intertrial priming of visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(5), 1350–1360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ásgeirsson, Á. G., Kristjánsson, Á., & Bundesen, C. (2014). Independent priming of location and color in identification of briefly presented letters. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(1), 40–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bichot, N. P., & Schall, J. D. (2002). Priming in macaque frontal cortex during popout visual search: Feature-based facilitation and location-based inhibition of return. Journal of Neuroscience, 22(11), 4675–4685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campana, G., & Casco, C. (2009). Repetition effects of features and spatial position: Evidence for dissociable mechanisms. Spatial Vision, 22(4), 325–338.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christie, J., & Klein, R. M. (2001). Negative priming for spatial location? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 55(1), 24–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, E., & de Fockert, J. W. (2001). Inhibitory effects of repeating color and shape: Inhibition of return or repetition blindness? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 798–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings, C., Schneider, K. K., & Fox, E. (2015). The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(6), 1577–1597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyer, T., Müller, H. J., & Krummenacher, J. (2007). Cross-trial priming of element positions in visual pop-out search is dependent on stimulus arrangement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 788–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyer, T., Zehetleitner, M., & Müller, H. J. (2010). Positional priming of pop-out: A relational-encoding account. Journal of Vision, 10(2), 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokce, A., Geyer, T., Finke, K., Müller, H. J., & Töllner, T. (2014). What pops out in positional priming of pop-out: Insights from event-related EEG lateralizations. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 688. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokce, A., Müller, H. J., & Geyer, T. (2013). Positional priming of pop-out is nested in visuospatial context. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 32. doi: 10.1167/13.3.32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goolsby, B. A., & Suzuki, S. (2001). Understanding priming of color-singleton search: Roles of attention at encoding and “retrieval”. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(6), 929–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilchey, M. D., Rajsic, J., Huffman, G., & Pratt, J. (2017). Intervening response events between identification targets do not always turn repetition benefits into repetition costs. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 807–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5(1–2), 183–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(11), 494–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2005). How much attention does an event file need? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), 1067–1082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2007). Feature integration across perception and action: Event files affect response choice. Psychological Research, 71(1), 42–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2011). The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta Psychologica, 136(2), 189–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. (2004). Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cognition, 11(4), 483–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., Memelink, J., Zmigrod, S., & Colzato, L. S. (2014). Attentional control of the creation and retrieval of stimulus–response bindings. Psychological Research, 78(4), 520–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and brain sciences, 24(5), 910–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68(1), 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingstone, A. (1992). Combining expectancies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 44(1), 69–104.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, R. M. (2004). Orienting and inhibition of return. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (3rd ed., pp. 545–559). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, Á., Vuilleumier, P., Malhotra, P., Husain, M., & Driver, J. (2005). Priming of color and position during visual search in unilateral spatial neglect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(6), 859–873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krummenacher, J., Müller, H. J., Zehetleitner, M., & Geyer, T. (2009). Dimension- and space-based intertrial effects in visual pop-out search: Modulation by task demands for focal-attentional processing. Psychological Research, 73(2), 186–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumada, T., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Cross-dimensional interference and cross-trial inhibition. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(3), 493–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, H. W., & Egeth, H. (1992). Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 51(5), 455–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamy, D., Yashar, A., & Ruderman, L. (2010). A dual-stage account of inter-trial priming effects. Vision Research, 50(14), 1396–1401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamy, D., Zivony, A., & Yashar, A. (2011). The role of search difficulty in intertrial feature priming. Vision Research, 51(19), 2099–2109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, M. B., Pratt, J., & Abrams, R. A. (1995). Color-based inhibition of return. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 57(3), 402–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupiáñez, J., Martín-Arévalo, E., & Chica, A. B. (2013). Is inhibition of return due to attentional disengagement or to a detection cost? The detection cost theory of IOR. Psicologica: International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 34(2), 221–252.
   Google Scholar
• Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(7), 977–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Arévalo, E., Chica, A. B., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). Task dependent modulation of exogenous attention: Effects of target duration and intervening events. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(6), 1148–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maylor, E. A., & Hockey, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 777–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notebaert, W., & Soetens, E. (2003). The influence of irrelevant stimulus changes on stimulus and response repetition effects. Acta Psychologica, 112(2), 143–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N. L., & Meeter, M. (2006). On the dissociation between compound and present/absent tasks in visual search: Intertrial priming is ambiguity driven. Visual Cognition, 13, 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. C. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(1), 33–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., Cohen, Y., Choate, L., Hockey, R., & Maylor, E. A. (1984). Sustained concentration: Passive filtering or active orienting? In S. Kornblum & J. Requin (Eds.), Preparatory states and processes (pp. 49–65). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajsic, J., Bi, Y., & Wilson, D. E. (2014). Long-term facilitation of return: A response-retrieval effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(2), 418–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggio, L., Patteri, I., & Umiltà, C. (2004). Location and shape in inhibition of return. Psychological Research, 68(1), 41–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimojo, S., Tanaka, Y., Hikosaka, O., & Miyauchi, S. (1996). Vision, attention, and action: Inhibition and facilitation in sensory-motor links revealed by the reaction time and the line motion. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 597–630). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spadaro, A., He, C., & Milliken, B. (2012). Response to an intervening event reverses nonspatial repetition effects in 2AFC tasks: Nonspatial IOR? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(2), 331–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spadaro, A., & Milliken, B. (2013). Subjective expectancy and inhibition of return: A dissociation in a non-spatial two-alternative forced choice task. Psicologica: International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 34(2), 199–219.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, Y., & Shimojo, S. (1996). Location vs feature: Reaction time reveals dissociation between two visual functions. Vision Research, 36(14), 2125–2140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, Y., & Shimojo, S. (2000). Repetition priming reveals sustained facilitation and transient inhibition in reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(4), 1421–1435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Marzi, C. A., & Berlucchi, G. (1987). Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting. Neuropsychologia, 25(1), 55–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. L., & Donnelly, M. P. (2002). Inhibition of return for target discriminations: The effect of repeating discriminated and irrelevant stimulus dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(2), 292–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tower-Richardi, S. M., Leber, A. B., & Golomb, J. D. (2016). Spatial priming in ecologically relevant reference frames. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(1), 114–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, J. (1984). Saccades directed at previously attended locations in space. In A. J. Gale & C. W. Johnson (Eds.), Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 143–150). North Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, T. N., & Pratt, J. (2006). Inhibition of return in cue–target and target–target tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 174(1), 167–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. E., Castel, A. D., & Pratt, J. (2006). Long-term inhibition of return for spatial locations: Evidence for a memory retrieval account. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 2135–2147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashar, A., & Lamy, D. (2010). Intertrial repetition affects perception: The role of focused attention. Journal of Vision, 10, 3. doi: 10.1167/10.14.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashar, A., & Lamy, D. (2011). Refining the dual-stage account of intertrial feature priming: Does motor response or response feature matter? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(7), 2160–2167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehetleitner, M., Rangelov, D., & Müller, H. J. (2012). Partial repetition costs persist in nonsearch compound tasks: Evidence for multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(5), 879–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar