Physical and perceptual accuracy of upright and inverted face drawings

References

• Biederman, I., & Kim, J. G. (2008). 17000 years of depicting the junction of two smooth shapes. Perception, 37(1), 161–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busey, T. A. (1998). Physical and psychological representations of faces: Evidence from morphing. Psychological Science, 9(6), 476–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, R., & Wagemans, J. (2015). Visual arts training is linked to flexible attention to local and global levels of visual stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 161, 185–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, R., & Wagemans, J. (2016). The genesis of errors in drawing. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 65, 195–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. J. (2005). Look little, look often: The influence of gaze frequency on drawing accuracy. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 67(6), 997–1009.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. J., & Bennett, S. (1997). Why can’t most people draw what they see? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(3), 609–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. J., & Earls, H. (2010). Inverting an image does not improve drawing accuracy. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 168–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidenko, N. (2007). Silhouetted face profiles: A new methodology for face perception research. Journal of Vision, 7(4), 6, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidenko, N., Remus, D. A., & Grill-Spector, K. (2012). Face likeness and image variability drive responses in human face selective ventral regions. Human Brain Mapping, 33(10), 2334–2349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devue, C., & Grimshaw, G. M. (2017). Portraits drawn by novices predict face processing skills.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, B. (1989). Drawing on the right Side of the brain: A course in enchanting creativity and artistic confidence. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, A., Lee, K., & Symons, L. A. (2000). The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence. Perception, 29(2), 159–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, C. W. (2003). Drawing for the absolute and utter beginner. New York: Watson-Guptill Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, S., & Milne, N. (2011). What’s wrong with this picture? An experiment in quantifying accuracy in 2D portrait drawing. Visual Communication, 10(2), 149–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanwisher, N., Tong, F., & Nakayama, K. (1998). The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area. Cognition, 68(1), B1–B11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozbelt, A., Seidel, A., ElBassiouny, A., Mark, Y., & Owen, D. R. (2010). Visual selection contributes to artists’ advantages in realistic drawing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(2), 93–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miall, R. C., Nam, S. H., & Tchalenko, J. (2014). The influence of stimulus format on drawing—a functional imaging study of decision making in portrait drawing. NeuroImage, 102, 608–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrofsky, J., Cohen, D. J., & Kozbelt, A. (2014). Objective versus subjective measures of face-drawing accuracy and their relations with perceptual constancies. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 486–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrofsky, J., Kozbelt, A., Cohen, D. J., Conklin, L., & Thomson, K. (2016). Face inversion impairs the ability to draw long-range, but Not short-range, spatial relationships between features. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 34(2), 221–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrofsky, J., Kozbelt, A., & Seidel, A. (2012). Perceptual constancies and visual selection as predictors of realistic drawing skill. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richler, J. J., Cheung, O. S., & Gauthier, I. (2011). Holistic processing predicts face recognition. Psychological Science, 22(4), 464–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotshtein, P., Henson, R. N., Treves, A., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2005). Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 8(1), 107–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruskin, J. (1866). Modern painters.-5 vol (Vol. 3). New York: J. Wiley & Son.
   Google Scholar
• Solso, R. L. (2006). Brain activities in a skilled versus a novice artist: An fMRI study. Leonardo, 34(1), 31–34.
   Google Scholar
• Sperry, R. (1974). Lateral specialization in the surgically separated hemispheres. Chicago: The Neuroscience (Third study program).
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 46(2), 225–245.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 79(4), 471–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 43A(2), 161–204.
   Google Scholar
• Van Sommers, P. (1984). Drawing and cognition: Descriptive and experimental studies of graphic production processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, H. R., Loffler, G., & Wilkinson, F. (2002). Synthetic faces, face cubes, and the geometry of face space. Vision Research, 42(27), 2909–2923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 141–145.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16(6), 747–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yovel, G., & Kanwisher, N. (2005). The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect. Current Biology, 15(24), 2256–2262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, G., Cheng, Z., Zhang, X., & Wong, A. C. (2012). Smaller holistic processing of faces associated with face drawing experience. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(2), 157–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar