Oculomotion mediates attentional guidance toward temporarily close objects

References

• Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science, 14, 427–432. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.01458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awh, E., Armstrong, K. M., & Moore, T. (2006). Visual and oculomotor selection: Links, causes and implications for spatial attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 124–130. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, G. Y., & Flombaum, J. I. (2012). Close encounters of the distracting kind: Identifying the cause of visual tracking errors. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 703–715. doi: 10.3758/s13141-011-0260-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baguley, T. (2012). Calculating and graphing within-subject confidence intervals for ANOVA. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 158–175. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0123-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Updating the premotor theory: The allocation of attention is not always accompanied by saccade preparation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 902–914. doi: 10.1037/a0028662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2005). Object appearance, disappearance, and attention prioritization in real-world scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1061–1067. doi: 10.3758/BF03206444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmi, R., & Itti, L. (2006). Visual causes versus correlates of attentional selection in dynamic scenes. Vision Research, 46, 4333–4345. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.08.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827–1837. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00294-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, T., Horowitz, T. S., & Vogel, E. K. (2013). Swapping or dropping? Electrophysiological measures of difficulty during multiple object tracking. Cognition, 126, 213–223. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehd, H. M., & Seiffert, A. E. (2008). Eye movements during multiple object tracking: Where do participants look? Cognition, 108, 201–209. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fencsik, D. E., Klieger, S. B., & Horowitz, T. S. (2007). The role of location and motion information in the tracking and recovery of moving objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 567–577. doi: 10.3758/BF031939140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2010). An R companion to applied regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Franconeri, S. L., Jonathan, S. V., & Scimeca, J. M. (2010). Tracking multiple objects is limited only by object spacing, not speed, time, or capacity. Psychological Science, 21, 920–925. doi: 10.1177/0956797610373935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franconeri, S. L., Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Scholl, B. J. (2012). A simple proximity heuristic allows tracking of multiple objects through occlusion. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 691–702. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0265-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franconeri, S. L., & Simons, D. J. (2003). Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 999–1010. doi: 10.3758/BF03194829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galazka, M., & Nyström, P. (2016). Visual attention to dynamic spatial relations in infants and adults. Infancy, 21, 90–103. doi: 10.1111/infa.12091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, T., Newman, G. E., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 154–179. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, T., & Scholl, B. J. (2011). Chasing vs. stalking: Interrupting the perception of animacy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 669–684. doi: 10.1037/a0020735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, S., Cavanagh, P., & Intriligator, J. (1996). Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature, 383, 334–337. doi: 10.1038/383334a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259. doi: 10.2307/1416950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillstrom, A. P., & Yantis, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 399–411. doi: 10.3758/BF03205298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J. E., & Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 787–795. doi: 10.3758/BF03206794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horstmann, G. (2002). Evidence for attentional capture by a surprising color singleton in visual search. Psychological Science, 13, 499–505. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, M., Papenmeier, F., Jahn, G., & Hesse, F. W. (2010). Eye movements across viewpoint changes in multiple object tracking. Visual Cognition, 18, 1368–1391. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2010.495878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intriligator, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2001). The spatial resolution of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 171–216. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iordanescu, L., Grabowecky, M., & Suzuki, S. (2009). Demand-based dynamic distribution of attention and monitoring of velocities during multiple-object tracking. Journal of Vision, 9(4), 1–12. doi: 10.1167/9.4.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye. In J. Long, & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346–354. doi: 10.3758/BF03208805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane, B. P., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2006). Is motion extrapolation employed in multiple object tracking? Tracking as a low-level, non-predictive function. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 346–368. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Huff, M., & Schwan, S. (2013). Linking perceptual animacy to attention: Evidence from the chasing detection paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1003–1015. doi: 10.1037/a0030839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, H. S, Papenmeier, F, & Huff, M. (2017). Studying visual attention using the multiple object tracking paradigm: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(5), 1255–1274. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1338-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Papenmeier, F., & Huff, M. (2013). Object-based integration of motion information during attentive tracking. Perception, 42, 119–121. doi: 10.1068/p7273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Papenmeier, F., Jahn, G., & Huff, M. (2016). Not FLEXible enough: Exploring the temporal dynamics of attentional reallocations with the multiple object tracking paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, H. S., & Scholl, B. J. (in press). Auditory-induced bouncing is a perceptual (rather than a cognitive) phenomenon: Evidence from illusory crescents. Cognition.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Schwan, S., & Huff, M. (2014a). Interobject spacing explains the attentional bias toward interacting objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 412–417. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0496-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, H. S., Schwan, S., & Huff, M. (2014b). Perceptual animacy: Visual search for chasing objects among distractors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 702–717. doi: 10.1037/a0034846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality. Oxford: Basic Books. [English translation by Miles, T., & Miles, E.; originally published as Michotte, A. (1946). La perception de la causalité. Louvain: Institut Supérior de Philosophie].
   Google Scholar
• Mital, P. K., Smith, T. J., Hill, R. L., & Henderson, J. M. (2011). Clustering of gaze during dynamic scene viewing is predicted by motion. Cognitive Computation, 3, 5–24. doi: 10.1007/s12559-010-9074-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315–330. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.15.2.315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, J. W. (2007). Psychopy—psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162, 8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.neumeth.2006.11.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., & R Development Core Team. (2011). Nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-102.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25. doi: 10.1080/00335558008248231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, J., Radulescu, P., Guo, R. M., & Abrams, R. A. (2010). It’s alive! Animate motion captures visual attention. Psychological Science, 21, 1724–1730. doi: 10.1177/0956797610387440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 179–197. doi: 10.1163/156856888X00122
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rauschenberger, R. (2003). When something old becomes something new: Spatiotemporal object continuity and attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 600–615. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remington, R. W. (1980). Attention and saccadic eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 726–744. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.6.4.726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., & Umiltá, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 31–40. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90041-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux, P., Passerieux, C., & Ramus, F. (2013). Kinematics matters: A new eye-tracking investigation of animated triangles. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 229–244. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.704052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, P. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 299–309. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01506-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheliga, B. M., Riggio, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1994). Orienting of attention and eye movements. Experimental Brain Research, 98, 507–522. doi: 10.1007/BF00233988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T., & Henderson, J. (2008). Attentional synchrony in static and dynamic scenes. Journal of Vision, 8, 773 [Abstact]. Retrieved from http://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2137508
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. J., & Mital, P. K. (2013). Attentional synchrony and the influence of viewing task on gaze behavior in static and dynamic scenes. Journal of Vision, 13, 1–24. doi: 10.1167/13.8.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St.Clair, R., Huff, M., & Seiffert, A. E. (2010). Conflicting motion information impairs multiple object tracking. Journal of Vision, 10(4), 1–13. doi: 10.1167/10.4.18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunny, M. M., & von Mühlenen, A. (2011). Motion onset does not capture attention when subsequent motion is “smooth”. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1050–1056. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0152-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taya, S., Windridge, D., Osman, M., & Suzuki, S. (2012). Looking to score: The dissociation of goal influence on eye movement and meta-attentional allocation in a complex dynamic natural scene. PloS One, 7, e39060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 65–70. doi: 10.3758/BF03206462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., & Irwin, D. E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science, 9, 379–385. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tombu, M., & Seiffert, A. E. (2008). Attentional costs in multiple-object tracking. Cognition, 108, 1–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Burg, E., Olivers, C. N., Bronkhorst, A. W., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). Pip and pop: Nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1053–1065. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2017). Five factors that guide attention in visual search. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0058. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yantis, S., & Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 661–676. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.3.661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zelinsky, G. J, & Neider, M. B. (2008). An eye movement analysis of multiple object tracking in a realistic environment. Visual Cognition, 16, 553–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelinsky, G. J., & Todor, A. (2010). The role of “rescue saccades” in tracking objects through occlusions. Journal of Vision, 10, 29. doi: 10.1167/10.14.29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, S. H., Ma, Z., Wilson, C., Liu, Y., & Flombaum, J. I. (2014). Why do people appear not to extrapolate trajectories during multiple object tracking? A computational investigation. Journal of Vision, 14(12), 1–30. doi: 10.1167/14.12.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar