The power of the imagination to affect peripersonal space representations

References

• Abrams, R. A., Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Knapp, W. K., & Paull, D. (2008). Altered vision near the hands. Cognition, 107, 1035–1047. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams, R. A., & Weidler, B. J. (2014). Tradeoffs in visual processing for stimuli near the hands. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 383–390. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0583-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, R. A., & Buneo, C. A. (2002). Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 189–220. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, M. W. (2009). Panic search: Fear produces efficient visual search for nonthreatening objects. Psychological Science, 20(4), 435–437. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02303.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkering, H., & Neggers, S. F. W. (2002). Visual search is modulated by action intentions. Psychological Science, 13(4), 370–374. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2002.00466.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertamini, M., Masala, L., Meyer, G., & Bruno, N. (2010). Vision, haptics, and attention: New data from a multisensory Necker cube. Perception, 39, 195–207. doi: 10.1068/p6461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berti, A., & Frassinetti, F. (2000). When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 415–420. doi: 10.1162/089892900562237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgeois, J., Farnè, A., & Coello, Y. (2014). Costs and benefits of tool-use on the perception of reachable space. Acta Psychologica, 148, 91–95. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brozzoli, C., Ehrsson, H. H., & Farnè, A. (2014). Multisensory representation of the space near the hand: From perception to action and interindividual interactions. The Neuroscientist, 20(2), 122–135. doi: 10.1177/1073858413511153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coello, Y., & Fischer, M. H. (2016). Perceptual and emotional embodiment. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cosman, J. D., & Vecera, S. P. (2010). Attention affects visual perceptual processing near the hand. Psychological Science, 21, 1254–1258. doi: 10.1177/0956797610380697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Neural representations of graspable objects: Are tools special? Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 457–469. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.10.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davoli, C. C., & Abrams, R. A. (2009). Reaching out with the imagination. Psychological Science, 20, 293–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02293.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Montana, J., Garverick, S., & Abrams, R. A. (2010). When meaning matters, look but don’t touch: The effects of posture on reading. Memory & Cognition, 38, 555–562. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.5.555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrsson, H. (2007). The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences. Science, 317, 1048. doi: 10.1126/science.1142175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagioli, S., Hommel, B., & Schubotz, R. I. (2007). Intentional control of attention: Action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung.Special Issue: Integration in and Across Perception and Action, 71(1), 22–29. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0033-3
   Google Scholar
• Farnè, A., Demattè, M., & Làdavas, E. (2005). Neuropsychological evidence of modular organization of the near peripersonal space. Neurology, 65(11), 1754–1758. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000187121.30480.09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnè, A., & Làdavas, E. (2000). Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. NeuroReport, 11, 1645–1649. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200006050-00010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, E., Lester, V., Russo, R., Bowles, R., Pichler, A., & Dutton, K. (2000). Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently? Cognition & Emotion, 14(1), 61–92. doi: 10.1080/026999300378996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziano, M. S. A., Hu, X. T., & Gross, C. G. (1997). Visual properties of the ventral premotor cortex. The Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 2268–2292. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.5.2268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziano, M. S. A., Yap, G. S., & Gross, C. G. (1994). Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. Science, 266, 1054–1057. doi: 10.1126/science.7973661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuchi, S., Imamizu, H., & Kawato, M. (2007). Cerebellar activity evoked by common tool-use execution and imagery tasks: An fMRI study. Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 43(3), 350–358. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70460-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iachini, T., Ruggiero, G., Ruotolo, F., & Vinciguerra, M. (2014). Motor resources in peripersonal space are intrinsic to spatial encoding: Evidence from motor interference. Acta Psychologica, 153, 20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. NeuroReport, 7(14), 2325–2330. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199610020-00010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., Obayashi, S., & Iwamura, Y. (2001). Self-images in the video monitor coded by monkey intraparietal neurons. Neuroscience Research, 40(2), 163–173. doi: 10.1016/S0168-0102(01)00225-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaac, A., Marks, D., & Russell, D. (1986). An instrument for assessing imagery of movement: The Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire (VMIQ). Journal of Mental Imagery, 10(4), 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, S103–S109. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeannerod, M., Arbib, M. A., Rizzolatti, G., & Sakata, H. (1995). Grasping objects: The cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends in Neurosciences, 18, 314–320. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(95)93921-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makin, T. R., Holmes, N. P., & Zohary, E. (2007). Is that near my hand? Multisensory representation of peripersonal space in human intraparietal sulcus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 731–740. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3653-06.2007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maravita, A., Spence, C., Kennett, S., & Driver, J. (2002). Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition, 83(2), B25–B34. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00003-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruya, K., Yang, E., & Blake, R. (2007). Voluntary action influences visual competition. Psychological Science, 18(12), 1090–1098. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02030.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata, A., Gallese, V., Luppino, G., Kaseda, M., & Sakata, H. (2000). Selectivity for the shape, size and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83(5), 2580–2601. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.5.2580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Previc, F. H. (1998). The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 123–164. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, C. L., Betz, R., Garza, J. P., & Roberts, R. J. (2010). Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(1), 236–245. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.1.236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, C. L., Grubb, J. D., & Steele, C. (2006). Hands up: Attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 166–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., & Sheliga, B. M. (1994). Space and selective attention. In C. Umiltà, & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance (pp. 232–265). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakata, H., Taira, M., Murata, A., & Mine, S. (1995). Neural mechanisms of visual guidance of hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Cerebral Cortex. Special Issue: Spatial Vision and Movement in the Parietal Lobe, 5(5), 429–438. doi: 10.1093/cercor/5.5.429
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, P., & Bridgeman, B. (2011). Improved change detection with nearby hands. Experimental Brain Research, 209, 257–269. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2544-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, B. (2005). Functional significance of visuospatial representations. In P. Shah, & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 1–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vishton, P. M., Stephens, N. J., Nelson, L. A., Morra, S. E., Brunick, K. L., & Stevens, J. A. (2007). Planning to reach for an object changes how the reacher perceives it. Psychological Science, 18(8), 713–719. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01965.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wamain, Y., Gabrielli, F., & Coello, Y. (2016). EEG μ rhythm in virtual reality reveals that motor coding of visual objects in peripersonal space is task dependent. Cortex, 74, 20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidler, B. J., & Abrams, R. A. (2014). Enhanced cognitive control near the hands. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 462–469. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0514-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, J. K. (2011). Action’s effect on perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 201–206. doi: 10.1177/0963721411408770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, J. K., & Proffitt, D. R. (2008). Action-specific influences on distance perception: A role for motor simulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1479–1492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, J. K., Proffitt, D. R., & Epstein, W. (2005). Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), 880–888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlschläger, A. (2000). Visual motion priming by invisible actions. Vision Research, 40(8), 925–930. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00239-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. M., & Flanagan, J. R. (2001). Motor prediction. Current Biology, 11(18), R729–R732. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00432-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar