Target self-relevance speeds visual search responses but does not improve search efficiency

References

• Alexopoulos, T., Muller, D., Ric, F., & Marendaz, C. (2012). I, me, mine: Automatic attentional capture by self related stimuli. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 770–779. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.1882/full doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cunningham, S. J., Turk, D. J., Macdonald, L. M., & Macrae, C. N. (2008). Yours or mine? Ownership and memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 312–318. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96(3), 433–458. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2015). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4629, 1–77. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15000965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes, L. J., Sui, J., Estévez, A. F., & Humphreys, G. W. (2016). The differential outcomes procedure can overcome self-bias in perceptual matching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 451–458. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0895-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillihan, S. J., & Farah, M. J. (2005). Is self special? A critical review of evidence from experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 76–97. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. W., & Sui, J. (2015). Attentional control and the self: The self attention network (SAN). Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 15–17. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1044427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40(10–12), 1489–1506. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00163-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(3), 194–203. doi: 10.1038/35058500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JASP Team. (2018). JASP (Version 0.9) [Computer software].
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, J. P., Wheeler, M. A., Gallup, G. G., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2000). Self-recognition and the right prefrontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(9), 338–344. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01521-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kircher, T. T. J., Senior, C., Phillips, M. L., Benson, P. J., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M., … David, A. S. (2000). Towards a functional neuroanatomy of self processing: Effects of faces and words. Cognitive Brain Research, 10(1–2), 133–144. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00036-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liesefeld, H. R., Müller, H. J., Moran, R., Usher, M., & Zehetleitner, M. (2016). Search efficiency as a function of target saliency: The transition from inefficient to efficient search and beyond. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(6), 821–836. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrae, C. N., Visokomogilski, A., Golubickis, M., & Cunningham, W. A. (2017). Self-relevance prioritizes access to visual awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(3), 438–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mevorach, C., Hodsoll, J., Allen, H., Shalev, L., & Humphreys, G. (2010). Ignoring the elephant in the room: A neural circuit to downregulate salience. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(17), 6072–6079. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0241-10.2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mevorach, C., Shalev, L., Allen, H. A., & Humphreys, G. W. (2009). The left intraparietal sulcus modulates the selection of low salient stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(2), 303–315. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11(1), 56–60. doi: 10.1080/17470215908416289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, A. L., & Sanchez, R. R. (1990). Critical color differences determined with a visual search task. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and Image Science, 7(7), 1209–1217. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.7.001209
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nothdurft, H. C. (1993). The role of features in preattentive vision: Comparison of orientation, motion and color cues. Vision Research, 33(14), 1937–1958. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90020-W
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelli, D. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pylyshyn, Z. (1999). Is vision continuous with cognitionThe case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 341–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuther, J., & Chakravarthi, R. (2017). Does self-prioritization affect perceptual processes? Visual Cognition, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2017.1323813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(9), 677–688. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper, Z. J. J., Cosman, J. D., & Vecera, S. P. (2013). Perceptual load corresponds with factors known to influence visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 1340–1351. doi: 10.1037/a0031616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, S., Frings, C., & Wentura, D. (2016). About the composition of self-relevance: Conjunctions not features are bound to the self. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(3), 887–892. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0953-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, T. W., & Johnson, S. C. (2007). Relevance to self: A brief review and framework of neural systems underlying appraisal. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 31, 585–596. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, K. L., Caldwell, J., & Sorensen, R. E. (1997). Personal names and the attentional blink: A visual “cocktail party” effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(2), 504–514. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.2.504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebold, A., Weaver, M. D., Donk, M., & van Zoest, W. (2016). Social salience does not transfer to oculomotor visual search. Visual Cognition, 6285(January), 1–31. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2015.1121946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, T., Siebold, A., & Zoest, W. V. (2016). Testing the idea of privileged awareness of self-relevant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(329363), 1–16. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui, J. (2016). Self-Reference acts as a golden thread in binding. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(7), 482–483. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui, J., He, X., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). Perceptual effects of social salience: Evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1105–1117. doi: 10.1037/a0029792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2015). The integrative self: How self-reference integrates perception and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(12), 719–728. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui, J., Liu, C. H., Wang, L., & Han, S. (2009). Attentional orientation induced by temporarily established self-referential cues. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(October), 844–849. doi: 10.1080/17470210802559393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui, J., Liu, M., Mevorach, C., & Humphreys, G. W. (2015). The salient self: The left intraparietal sulcus responds to social as well as perceptual-salience after self-association. Cerebral Cortex, 25(April), 1060–1068. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui, J., Rotshtein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2013). Coupling social attention to the self forms a network for personal significance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(19), 7607–7612. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221862110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 371–394. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95(1), 15–48. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.1.15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 459–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turatto, M., & Galfano, G. (2000). Color, form and luminance capture attention in visual search. Vision Research, 40, 1639–1643. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00061-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetter, P., & Newen, A. (2014). Varieties of cognitive penetration in visual perception. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 62–75. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickery, T. J., King, L., & Jiang, Y. V. (2005). Setting up the target template in visual search. Journal of Vision, 5, 81–92. doi: 10.1167/5.1.8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, G. L., & Vickery, T. J. (2017). Self-relevance effects and label choice: Strong variations in label-matching performance due to non-self-relevant factors. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1307-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0 A revised model of visual search. Psychnomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2), 202–238. doi: 10.3758/BF03200774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (2012). Guided search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems, 99–120. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189193.003.0008
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15(3), 419–433. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.419
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Kenner, N., Hyle, M., & Vasan, N. (2004). How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research, 44, 1411–1426. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Klempen, N. L., & Shulman, E. P. (1999). Which end is up? Two representations of orientation in visual search. Vision Research, 39(12), 2075–2086. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00260-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar