Location-based explanations do not account for active attentional suppression

References

• Andersen, S. K., & Müller, M. M. (2010). Behavioral performance follows the time course of neural facilitation and suppression during cued shifts of feature-selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(31), 13878–13882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arita, J. T., Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2012). Templates for rejection: Configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 580–584. doi: 10.1037/a0027885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2014). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: One decade on. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(4), 177–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55(5), 485–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, V. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2015). Evidence for negative feature guidance in visual search is explained by spatial recoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(5), 1190–1196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, M. W., Hemsteger, S., & Peltier, C. (2015). No templates for rejection: A failure to configure attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. Visual Cognition, 23(9–10), 1150–1167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bichot, N. P., & Schall, J. D. (2002). Priming in macaque frontal cortex during popout visual search: Feature-based facilitation and location-based inhibition of return. The Journal of Neuroscience, 22(11), 4675–4685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: Evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(2), 213–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97(4), 523–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesen, C., & Habekost, T. (2008). Principles of visual attention: Linking mind and brain. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlisle, N. B., Arita, J. T., Pardo, D., & Woodman, G. F. (2011). Attentional templates in visual working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(25), 9315–9322. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1097-11.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2011a). Automatic and strategic effects in the guidance of attention by working memory representations. Acta Psychologica, 137, 217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2011b). When memory is not enough: Electrophysiological evidence for goal-dependent use of working memory representations in guiding visual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 2650–2664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2013). Reconciling conflicting electrophysiological findings on the guidance of attention by working memory. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 75(7), 1330–1335. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0529-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. A., & Egeth, H. E. (2016). Taming the white bear: Initial costs and eventual benefits of distractor inhibition. Psychological Science, 27(4), 476–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96(3), 433–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2008). Bottom-up priming of top-down attentional control settings. Visual Cognition, 16(2–3), 215–231. doi: 10.1080/13506280701458804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspelin, N., Leonard, C. J., & Luck, S. J. (2017). Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(1), 45–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018a). Distinguishing among potential mechanisms of singleton suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(4), 626–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018b). The role of inhibition in avoiding distraction by salient stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 79–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, J. J. (2014). Attentional mechanisms of distractor suppression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 147–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubert, A., Carlisle, N. B., & Eimer, M. (2016). The control of single-color and multiple-color visual search by attentional templates in working memory and in long-term memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(12), 1947–1963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, C., Di Lollo, V., & McDonald, J. J. (2009). Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(4), 760–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyonaga, A., Egner, T., & Soto, D. (2012). Cognitive control over working memory biases of selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(4), 639–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamy, D., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2013). Is goal-directed attentional guidance just intertrial priming? A review. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Calderon, J., & Luck, S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: An open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(213), 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J. (2012). Electrophysiological correlates of the focusing of attention within complex visual scenes: N2pc and related ERP components. In S. J. Luck & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), The oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 329–360). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(5), 1000–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, J., & Egeth, H. E. (2012). The ignoring paradox: Cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(8), 1590–1605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, E., & DeSchepper, B. G. (1991). Costs and benefits of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(6), 1136–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Visual marking inhibits singleton capture. Cognitive Psychology, 47(1), 1–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N. L., Peters, J., Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2011). Different states in visual working memory: When it guides attention and when it does not. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(7), 327–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, J. C., Goebel, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2009). Remembered but unused: The accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(6), 1081–1091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeder, R. R., Olivers, C. N., & Pollmann, S. (2017). Cortical evidence for negative search templates. Visual Cognition, 25(1–3), 278–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, R. M., Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2014). Visual working memory gives up attentional control early in learning: Ruling out interhemispheric cancellation. Psychophysiology, 51(8), 800–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saevarsson, S., Jóelsdóttir, S., Hjaltason, H., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2008). Repetition of distractor sets improves visual search performance in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia, 46, 1161–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2010). Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(6), 1455–1470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2011). Active suppression of distractors that match the contents of visual working memory. Visual Cognition, 19(7), 956–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl, K. N., Peelen, M. V., & Kastner, S. (2012). Neural evidence for distractor suppression during visual search in real-world scenes. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(34), 11812–11819. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1693-12.2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(1), 65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 54(2), 321–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatterott, D. B., & Vecera, S. P. (2012). Experience-dependent attentional tuning of distractor rejection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(5), 871–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D., Kristjánsson, A., & Nakayama, K. (2005). Efficient visual search without top-down or bottom-up guidance. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(2), 239–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0 a revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2), 202–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Guided search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems (pp. 99–119). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, G. F., & Arita, J. T. (2011). Direct electrophysiological measurement of attentional templates in visual working memory. Psychological Science, 22(2), 212–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman, G. F., Carlisle, N. B., & Reinhart, R. M. G. (2013). Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention? Journal of Vision, 13(3), 1–17. doi: 10.1167/13.3.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (1999). Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature, 400(6747), 867–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2003). Serial deployment of attention during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 121–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar