Differential activation of a central inhibition system by motion and colour distractors

References

• Al-Aidroos, N., Guo, R. M., & Pratt, J. (2010). You can’t stop new motion: Attentional capture despite a control set for colour. Visual Cognition, 18(6), 859–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariga, A., & Kawahara, J. I. (2004). The perceptual and cognitive distractor-previewing effect. Journal of Vision, 4-5(10), 891–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arita, J. T., Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2012). Templates for rejection: Configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 580–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, D. H., Clifford, C. W., & Wenderoth, P. (2001). Asynchronous processing in vision: Color leads motion. Current Biology, 11(8), 596–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridge Research Systems Ltd, 80 Riverside, Sir Thomas Longley Road, ROCHESTER, Kent, ME2 4BH, UK. Retrieved from: http://www.crsltd.com/
   Google Scholar
• Dux, P. E., Coltheart, V., & Harris, I. M. (2006). On the fate of distractor stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation. Cognition, 99(3), 355–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception, & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmann-Wüstefeld, T., & Vogel, E. K. (2018). Neural evidence for the contribution of active suppression during working memory filtering. Cerebral Cortex, 1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geng, J. J. (2014). Attentional mechanisms of distractor suppression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 147–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasher, L., Lustig, C., & Zacks, R. T. (2007). Inhibitory mechanisms and the control of attention. Variation in Working Memory, 19, 227–249.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, J. L., Milders, M. M., Sahraie, A., & Niedeggen, M. (2006). The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: The efficiency of selective inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(4)–907, 885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesselmann, G., Niedeggen, M., Sahraie, A., & Milders, M. (2006). Specifying the distractor inhibition account of attention-induced motion blindness. Vision Research, 46(6–7), 1048–1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange-Malecki, B., & Treue, S. (2012). A flanker effect for moving visual stimuli. Vision Research, 62, 134–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T., Hospadaruk, L., Zhu, D. C., & Gardner, J. L. (2011). Feature-specific attentional priority signals in human cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(12), 4484–4495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lleras, A., Kawahara, J. I., & Levinthal, B. R. (2009). Past rejections lead to future misses: Selection-related inhibition produces blink-like misses of future (easily detectable) events. Journal of Vision, 9(3), 26–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lleras, A., Kawahara, J. I., Wan, X. I., & Ariga, A. (2008). Intertrial inhibition of focused attention in pop-out search. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(1), 114–131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loach, D., & Marí-Beffa, P. (2003). Post-target inhibition: A temporal binding mechanism? Visual Cognition, 10(5), 513–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., Tian, L., Zhang, J., Wang, J., Ye, C., & Liu, Q. (2017). Strategic inhibition of distractors with visual working memory contents after involuntary attention capture. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 16314.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michael, L., Hesselmann, G., Kiefer, M., & Niedeggen, M. (2011). Distractor-induced blindness for orientation changes and coherent motion. Vision Research, 51(15), 1781–1787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, L., Kiefer, M., & Niedeggen, M. (2012). The influence of distracter and target features on distracter induced blindness. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8(1), 62–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, J., & Egeth, H. E. (2012). The ignoring paradox: Cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(8), 1590–1605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedeggen, M., Busch, N. A., & Winther, G. N. (2015). The state of a central inhibition system predicts access to visual targets: An ERP study on distractor-induced blindness (DIB). Consciousness and Cognition, 35, 308–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedeggen, M., Hesselmann, G., Sahraie, A., Milders, M., & Blakemore, C. (2004). Probing the prerequisites for motion blindness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(4), 584–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedeggen, M., Michael, L., & Hesselmann, G. (2012). Closing the gates to consciousness: Distractors activate a central inhibition process. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(6), 1294–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nothdurft, H. C. (2000). Salience from feature contrast: Temporal properties of saliency mechanisms. Vision Research, 40(18), 2421–2435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N., Humphreys, G. W., & Braithwaite, J. J. (2006). The preview search task: Evidence for visual marking. Visual Cognition, 14(4-8), 716–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N., & Meeter, M. (2008). A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention. Psychological Review, 115(4), 836–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeder, R. R., Olivers, C. N., & Pollmann, S. (2017). Cortical evidence for negative search templates. Visual Cognition, 25(1-3), 278–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. L., & Hall, D. A. (2008). Examining a supramodal network for conflict processing: A systematic review and novel functional magnetic resonance imaging data for related visual and auditory stroop tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(6), 1063–1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahraie, A., Milders, M., & Niedeggen, M. (2001). Attention induced motion blindness. Vision Research, 41, 1613–1617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakagami, M., & Pan, X. (2007). Functional role of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex in decision making. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17(2), 228–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakagami, M., Pan, X., & Uttl, B. (2006). Behavioral inhibition and prefrontal cortex in decision-making. Neural Networks, 19(8), 1255–1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2010). Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(6), 1455–1470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2013). Active suppression after involuntary capture of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(2), 296–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, M. W., Cowan, W. B., & Beatty, J. C. (1987). An experimental comparison of RGB, YIQ, LAB, HSV, and opponent color models. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 6(2), 123–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(1), 137–149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Velhagen, K., & Broschmann, D. (2003). Tafeln zur Prüfung des Farbsinns (33rd ed.) [Panels for tests of the colour sense]. Stuttgart: Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Winther, G. N., & Niedeggen, M. (2017a). Distractor-induced blindness: A special case of contingent attentional capture? Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 13(1), 52–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winther, G. N., & Niedeggen, M. (2017b). Adaptability and specificity of inhibition processes in distractor-induced blindness. Psychophysiology, 54(12), 1882–1898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2007). Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(2), 363–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanto, T. P., & Rissman, J. (2015). Top-down suppression. Brain Mapping: An Encyclopedic Reference, 3, 261–267.
   Google Scholar
• Zanto, T. P., Rubens, M. T., Bollinger, J., & Gazzaley, A. (2010). Top-down modulation of visual feature processing: The role of the inferior frontal junction. Neuroimage, 53(2), 736–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanto, T. P., Rubens, M. T., Thangavel, A., & Gazzaley, A. (2011). Causal role of the prefrontal cortex in top-down modulation of visual processing and working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 14(5), 656–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar