Feature guidance by negative attentional templates depends on search difficulty

References

• Arita, J. T., Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2012). Templates for rejection: Configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 580–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, V. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2015). Evidence for negative feature guidance in visual search is explained by spatial recoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 1190–1196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, V. M., Luck, S. J., & Hollingworth, A. (2018). Whatever you do, don’t look at the … : Evaluating guidance by an exclusionary attentional template. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 645–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, M. W., Hemsteger, S., & Peltier, C. (2016). No templates for rejection: A failure to configure attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. Visual Cognition, 23, 1150–1167. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2016.1149532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlisle, N. B., Arita, J. T., Pardo, D., & Woodman, G. F. (2011). Attentional templates in visual working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 9315–9322. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1097-11.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelazzi, L., Miller, E. K., Duncan, J., & Desimone, R. (1993). A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature, 363, 345–347. doi: 10.1038/363345a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Schnabl, L., Müller, H. J., & Conci, M. (2018). Amodal completion of a target template enhances attentional guidance in visual search. i-Perception, 9(4), 1–10. doi: 10.1177/2041669518796240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conci, M., Gramann, K., Müller, H. J., & Elliott, M. A. (2006). Electrophysiological correlates of similarity-based interference during detection of visual forms. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 880–888. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conci, M., Müller, H. J., & Elliott, M. A. (2007). The contrasting impact of global and local object attributes on Kanizsa figure detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1278–1294. doi: 10.3758/BF03192945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conci, M., Zellin, M., & Müller, H. J. (2012). Whatever after next? Adaptive predictions based on short- and long-term memory in visual search. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 409. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. A., & Egeth, H. E. (2016). Taming the white bear: Initial costs and eventual benefits of distractor inhibition. Psychological Science, 27, 476–485. doi: 10.1177/0956797615626564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Psychological Science, 6, 274–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018). The role of inhibition in avoiding distraction by salient stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 79–92. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, J. J., DiQuattro, N. E., & Helm, J. (2017). Distractor probability changes the shape of the attentional template. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 1993–2007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. W., & Müller, H. J. (1993). SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A connectionist model of visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 43–110. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1993.1002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JASP Team. (2017). JASP (Version 0.8.2) [Computer software].
   Google Scholar
• Kugler, G., ‘t Hart, B. M., Kohlbecher, S., Einhäuser, W., & Schneider, E. (2015). Gaze in visual search is guided more efficiently by positive cues than by negative cues. PLoS One, 10(12), e0145910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, J., Lakshmanan, B. M., Egeth, H. E., & Ewen, J. B. (2014). Inhibition drives early feature-based attention. Psychological Science, 25, 315–324. doi: 10.1177/0956797613511257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz, D. P., & Everling, S. (2004). Look away: The anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 218–228. doi: 10.1038/nrn1345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, Q.-Y., Maurer, M., Müller, H. J., & Conci, M. (2016). Inhibition drives configural superiority of illusory Gestalt: Combined behavioral and drift-diffusion model evidence. Cognition, 150, 150–162. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reeder, R. R., Olivers, C. N. L., & Pollmann, S. (2017). Cortical evidence for negative search templates. Visual Cognition, 25, 278–290. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2017.1339755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J., & Zelinski, G. J. (2017). Adding details to the attentional template offsets search difficulty: Evidence from contralateral delay activity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 429–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Töllner, T., Conci, M., & Müller, H. J. (2015). Predictive distractor context facilitates attentional selection of high, but not intermediate and low, salience targets. Human Brain Mapping, 36, 935–944. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Töllner, T., Conci, M., Rusch, T., & Müller, H. J. (2013). Selective manipulation of target identification demands in visual search: The role of stimulus contrast in CDA activations. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 1–23. doi: 10.1167/13.3.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Töllner, T., Zehetleitner, M., Gramann, K., & Müller, H. J. (2010). Top-down weighting of visual dimensions: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Vision Research, 50, 1372–1381. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsal, Y., & Makovski, T. (2006). The attentional white bear phenomenon: The mandatory allocation of attention to expected distractor locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 351–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickery, T. J., King, L.-W., & Jiang, Y. V. (2005). Setting up the target template in visual search. Journal of Vision, 5(1), 8–92. doi: 10.1167/5.1.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Kenner, N. M., Hyle, M., & Vasan, N. (2004). How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research, 44, 1411–1426. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar