Attentional suppression is delayed for threatening distractors

References

• Barras, C., & Kerzel, D. (2016). Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference. Biological Psychology, 121(Pt A), 74–83. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barras, C., & Kerzel, D. (2017). Salient-but-irrelevant stimuli cause attentional capture in difficult, but attentional suppression in easy visual search. Psychophysiology, 54(12), 1826–1838. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). No capture outside the attentional window. Vision Research, 50(23), 2543–2550. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, S. J. (2007). Neurocognitive mechanisms of anxiety: An integrative account. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(7), 307–316. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretherton, P. M., Eysenck, M. W., Richards, A., & Holmes, A. (2017). Target and distractor processing and the influence of load on the allocation of attention to task-irrelevant threat. Neuropsychologia. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buetti, S., Juan, E., Rinck, M., & Kerzel, D. (2012). Affective states leak into movement execution: Automatic avoidance of threatening stimuli in fear of spider is visible in reach trajectories. Cognition & Emotion, 26(7), 1176–1188. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.640662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buodo, G., Sarlo, M., Munafo, M., & Palomba, D. (2009). The neural correlates of attentional bias in blood phobia as revealed by the N2pc. Psychophysiology, 46(1), S32–S32.
   Google Scholar
• Burra, N., Barras, C., Coll, S. Y., & Kerzel, D. (2016). Electrophysiological evidence for attentional capture by irrelevant angry facial expressions. Biological Psychology, 120, 69–80. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burra, N., Coll, S. Y., Barras, C., & Kerzel, D. (2017). Electrophysiological evidence for attentional capture by irrelevant angry facial expressions: Naturalistic faces. Neuroscience Letters, 637, 44–49. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.11.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burra, N., & Kerzel, D. (2013). Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: Evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation. Psychophysiology, 50(5), 422–430. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burra, N., & Kerzel, D. (2014). The distractor positivity (Pd) signals lowering of attentional priority: Evidence from event-related potentials and individual differences. Psychophysiology, 51(7), 685–696. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delroisse, S., & Philippot, P. (2007). Questionnaire sur la peur des araignées: Validation Française du “Fear of Spiders Questionnaire”. Revue Francophone de Clinique Comportementale et Cognitive, 12(3), 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devue, C., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2011). The role of fear and expectancies in capture of covert attention by spiders. Emotion, 11(4), 768–775. doi: 10.1037/a0023418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwood, J. D., Smilek, D., & Merikle, P. M. (2001). Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(6), 1004–1013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M. (1996). The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99(3), 225–234. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(96)95711-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eimer, M., & Kiss, M. (2007). Attentional capture by task-irrelevant fearful faces is revealed by the N2pc component. Biological Psychology, 74(1), 108–112. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmann-Wustefeld, T., Brandhofer, R., & Schubo, A. (2016). Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts. Psychophysiology, 53(7), 1063–1073. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmann-Wustefeld, T., Schmidt-Daffy, M., & Schubo, A. (2011). Neural evidence for the threat detection advantage: Differential attention allocation to angry and happy faces. Psychophysiology, 48(5), 697–707. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01130.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmann-Wustefeld, T., & Schubo, A. (2013). Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 11–11. doi: 10.1167/13.3.11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmann-Wustefeld, T., & Schubo, A. (2016). Intertrial priming due to distractor repetition is eliminated in homogeneous contexts. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(7), 1935–1947. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1115-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmann-Wüstefeld, T., & Vogel, E. K. J. C. C. (2018). Neural evidence for the contribution of active suppression during working memory filtering.
   Google Scholar
• Fortier-Gauthier, U., Moffat, N., Dell'Acqua, R., McDonald, J. J., & Jolicoeur, P. (2012). Contralateral cortical organisation of information in visual short-term memory: Evidence from lateralized brain activity during retrieval. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1748–1758. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, E., Lester, V., Russo, R., Bowles, R. J., Pichler, A., & Dutton, K. (2000). Facial expressions of Emotion: Are angry faces detected more Efficiently? Cognition & Emotion, 14(1), 61–92. doi: 10.1080/026999300378996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspar, J. M., Christie, G. J., Prime, D. J., Jolicoeur, P., & McDonald, J. J. (2016). Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(13), 3693–3698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1523471113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspar, J. M., & McDonald, J. J. (2014). Suppression of salient objects prevents distraction in visual search. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(16), 5658–5666. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4161-13.2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018a). Combined electrophysiological and behavioral evidence for the suppression of salient distractors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(9), 1265–1280. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018b). The role of Inhibition in avoiding distraction by salient stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 79–92. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdes, A. B., Alpers, G. W., & Pauli, P. (2008). When spiders appear suddenly: Spider-phobic patients are distracted by task-irrelevant spiders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46(2), 174–187. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokce, A., Geyer, T., Finke, K., Muller, H. J., & Tollner, T. (2014). What pops out in positional priming of pop-out: Insights from event-related EEG lateralizations. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 688. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartikainen, K. M., Siiskonen, A. R., & Ogawa, K. H. (2012). Threat interferes with response inhibition. Neuroreport, 23(7), 447–450. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283531e74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, C., Di Lollo, V., & McDonald, J. J. (2009). Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(4), 760–775. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, C., McDonald, J. J., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(4), 604–613. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.4.604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilimire, M. R., Mounts, J. R., Parks, N. A., & Corballis, P. M. (2011). Dynamics of target and distractor processing in visual search: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Neuroscience Letters, 495(3), 196–200. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.03.064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodsoll, S., Viding, E., & Lavie, N. (2011). Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces. Emotion, 11(2), 346–353. doi: 10.1037/a0022771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S. L., Chang, Y. C., & Chen, Y. J. (2011). Task-irrelevant angry faces capture attention in visual search while modulated by resources. Emotion, 11(3), 544–552. doi: 10.1037/a0022763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jannati, A., Gaspar, J. M., & McDonald, J. J. (2013). Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(6), 1713–1730. doi: 10.1037/a0032251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerzel, D., Born, S., & Schonhammer, J. (2012). Perceptual grouping allows for attention to cover noncontiguous locations and suppress capture from nearby locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(6), 1362–1370. doi: 10.1037/a0027780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesel, A., Miller, J., Jolicoeur, P., & Brisson, B. (2008). Measurement of ERP latency differences: A comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods. Psychophysiology, 45(2), 250–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00618.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss, M., Grubert, A., Petersen, A., & Eimer, M. (2012). Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(3), 749–759. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolassa, I. T., Musial, F., Mohr, A., Trippe, R. H., & Miltner, W. H. (2005). Electrophysiological correlates of threat processing in spider phobics. Psychophysiology, 42(5), 520–530. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00315.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D. (1995). Attentional processing: The brain’s art of mindfulness (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamy, D., & Yashar, A. (2008). Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: Target uncertainty does. Vision Research, 48(10), 1274–1279. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leblanc, E., Prime, D. J., & Jolicoeur, P. (2008). Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(4), 657–671. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeDoux, J. (1996). Emotional networks and motor control: A fearful view. Progress in Brain Research, 107, 437–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liesefeld, H. R., Liesefeld, A. M., Tollner, T., & Muller, H. J. (2017). Attentional capture in visual search: Capture and post-capture dynamics revealed by EEG. Neuroimage, 156, 166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipp, O. V., & Derakshan, N. (2005). Attentional bias to pictures of fear-relevant animals in a dot probe task. Emotion, 5(3), 365–369. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipp, O. V., & Waters, A. M. (2007). When danger lurks in the background: Attentional capture by animal fear-relevant distractors is specific and selectively enhanced by animal fear. Emotion, 7(1), 192–200. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(5), 1000–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J., Patterson, T., & Ulrich, R. (1998). Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology, 35(1), 99–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miltner, W. H., Krieschel, S., Hecht, H., Trippe, R., & Weiss, T. (2004). Eye movements and behavioral responses to threatening and nonthreatening stimuli during visual search in phobic and nonphobic subjects. Emotion, 4(4), 323–339. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.4.323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mineka, S., & Ohman, A. (2002). Phobias and preparedness: The selective, automatic, and encapsulated nature of fear. Biological Psychiatry, 52(10), 927–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2006). Time course of attentional bias for fear-relevant pictures in spider-fearful individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(9), 1241–1250. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, A. (1996). Preferential preattentive processing of threat in anxiety: Preparedness and attentional biases. Current Controversies in the Anxiety Disorders, 2, 253–290.
   Google Scholar
• Ohman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 466–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 381–396. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108(3), 483–522. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(4), 369–378. doi: 10.3758/BF03210419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, Y., Olivers, C. N., & Theeuwes, J. (2005). Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: Intertrial priming does. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(8), 1354–1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reutter, M., Hewig, J., Wieser, M. J., & Osinsky, R. (2017). The N2pc component reliably captures attentional bias in social anxiety. Psychophysiology, 54(4), 519–527. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinck, M., Reinecke, A., Ellwart, T., Heuer, K., & Becker, E. S. (2005). Speeded detection and increased distraction in fear of spiders: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114(2), 235–248. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.114.2.235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaki, R., Geng, J. J., & Luck, S. J. (2012). A common neural mechanism for preventing and terminating the allocation of attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(31), 10725–10736. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1864-12.2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2010). Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(6), 1455–1470. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares, S. C., Esteves, F., Lundqvist, D., & Ohman, A. (2009). Some animal specific fears are more specific than others: Evidence from attention and emotion measures. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47(12), 1032–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.07.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szymanski, J., & O'Donohue, W. (1995). Fear of spiders Questionnaire. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26(1), 31–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50(2), 184–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51(6), 599–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top–down and bottom–up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 77–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuilleumier, P., & Schwartz, S. (2001). Beware and be aware: Capture of spatial attention by fear-related stimuli in neglect. Neuroreport, 12(6), 1119–1122. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200105080-00014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, M. D., van Zoest, W., & Hickey, C. (2017). A temporal dependency account of attentional inhibition in oculomotor control. Neuroimage, 147, 880–894. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weymar, M., Gerdes, A. B., Low, A., Alpers, G. W., & Hamm, A. O. (2013). Specific fear modulates attentional selectivity during visual search: Electrophysiological insights from the N2pc. Psychophysiology, 50(2), 139–148. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1988). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2003). Serial deployment of attention during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 121–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yantis, S., & Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 25(3), 661–676. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.3.661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar