Oculomotor inhibition of salient distractors: Voluntary inhibition cannot override selection history

References

• Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(25), 10367–10371. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104047108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arita, J. T., Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2012). Templates for rejection: Configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 580–584. doi: 10.1037/a0027885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 437–443. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, V. M., Luck, S. J., & Hollingworth, A. (2018). Whatever you do, don’t look at the … : Evaluating guidance by an exclusionary attentional template. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(4), 645–662. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. I. (2010). Oculomotor capture by colour singletons depends on intertrial priming. Vision Research, 50(21), 2116–2126. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlisle, N. B., Arita, J. T., Pardo, D., & Woodman, G. F. (2011). Attentional templates in visual working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(25), 9315–9322. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1097-11.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentiaonal guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10(4), 360–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosman, J. D., Lowe, K. A., Woodman, G. F., & Schall, J. D. (2018). Prefrontal control of visual distraction. Current Biology, 28, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosman, J. D., & Vecera, S. P. (2013). Context-dependent control over attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(3), 836–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosman, J. D., & Vecera, S. P. (2014). Establishment of an attentional set via statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(1), 1–6. doi: 10.1037/a0034489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. A., & Egeth, H. E. (2016). Taming the white bear. Psychological Science, 27(4), 476–485. doi: 10.1177/0956797615626564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. a., & Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(1), 32–39. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.10.1.32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmann-Wüstefeld, T., & Schubö, A. (2016). Intertrial priming due to distractor repetition is eliminated in homogeneous contexts. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(7), 1935–1947. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1115-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1030–1044. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspar, J. M., Christie, G. J., Prime, D. J., Jolicœur, P., & McDonald, J. J. (2016). Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(13), 3693–3698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspar, J. M., & McDonald, J. J. (2014). Suppression of salient objects prevents distraction in visual search. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(16), 5658–5666. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4161-13.2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspelin, N., Leonard, C. J., & Luck, S. J. (2015). Direct evidence for active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant sensory inputs. Psychological Science, 26(11), 1740–1750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspelin, N., Leonard, C. J., & Luck, S. J. (2017). Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(1), 45–62. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1209-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018a). Distinguishing among potential mechanisms of singleton suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(4), 626–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018b). Combined electrophysiological and behavioral evidence for the suppression of salient distractors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(9), 1265–1280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018c). The role of inhibition in avoiding distraction by salient stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 79–92. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, J. J., & Behrmann, M. (2002). Probability cuing of target location facilitates visual search implicitly in normal participants and patients with hemispatial neglect. Psychological Science, 13(6), 520–525. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, T., & Egeth, H. E. (2016). When does feature search fail to protect against attentional capture? Visual Cognition, 23(March), 1098–1123.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, C. J., & Luck, S. J. (2011). The role of magnocellular signals in oculomotor attentional capture. Journal of Vision, 11(13), 11–11. doi: 10.1167/11.13.11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., & Johnston, J. C. (2010). Attentional capture with rapidly changing attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1037/a0015875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22(6), 657–672. doi: 10.3758/BF03209251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, J., & Egeth, H. E. (2012). The ignoring paradox: Cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(8), 1590–1605. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0358-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2), 61–64. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0291-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertrial contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(3), 650–657. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2010). Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(6), 1455–1470. doi: 10.3758/APP
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilwell, B. T., & Vecera, S. P. (2018). Learned and cued distractor rejection for multiple features in visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81, 359–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51(6), 599–606. doi: 10.3758/BF03211656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 77–99. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (2018). Visual selection: Usually fast and automatic; seldom slow and volitional. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., & Kramer, A. F. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance, XVIII, 105–124.
   Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., & Irwin, D. E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science, 9(5), 379–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113(4), 766–786. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsal, Y., & Makovski, T. (2006). The attentional white bear phenomenon: The mandatory allocation of attention to expected distractor locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(2), 351–363. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatterott, D. B., Mozer, M. C., & Vecera, S. P. (2018). Rejecting salient distractors: Generalization from experience. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(2), 485–499. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1465-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatterott, D. B., & Vecera, S. P. (2012). Experience-dependent attentional tuning of distractor rejection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(5), 871–878. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0280-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2018). How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(4), 860–870. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1493-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101(1), 34–52. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2), 202–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Kenner, N. M., Hyle, M., & Vasan, N. (2004). How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research, 44(12), 1411–1426. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 601–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar