Statistical learning in visual search is easier after experience with noise than overcoming previous learning

References

• Allon, A., & Luria, R. (2016). Prepdat – an R package for preparing experimental data for statistical analysis. Journal of Open Research Software, 4(1), 43.
   Google Scholar
• Annac, E., Manginelli, A. A., Pollmann, S., Shi, Z., Müller, H. J., & Geyer, T. (2013). Memory under pressure: Secondary-task effects on contextual cueing of visual search. Journal of Vision, 13(13), 6–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertels, J., Franco, A., & Destrebecqz, A. (2012). How implicit is visual statistical learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1425–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bo, J., Jennett, S., & Seidler, R. D. (2011). Working memory capacity correlates with implicit serial reaction time task performance. Experimental Brain Research, 214(1), 73–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(5), 170–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 28–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conci, M., Sun, L., & Müller, H. J. (2011). Contextual remapping in visual search after predictable target-location changes. Psychological Research, 75(4), 279–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, T., Horowitz, T. S., Wolfe, J. M., & Vogel, E. K. (2012). Neural measures of dynamic changes in attentive tracking load. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(2), 440–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhart, A. L., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (2009). Changing structures in midstream: Learning along the statistical garden path. Cognitive Science, 33(6), 1087–1116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goujon, A., Didierjean, A., & Thorpe, S. (2015). Investigating implicit statistical learning mechanisms through contextual cueing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(9), 524–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., Song, J. H., & Rigas, A. (2005). High-capacity spatial contextual memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(3), 524–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. S., Woodman, G. F., Braun, E., & Luck, S. J. (2007). Implicit memory influences the allocation of attention in visual cortex. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 834–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungé, J. A., Scholl, B. J., & Chun, M. M. (2007). How is spatial context learning integrated over signal versus noise? A primacy effect in contextual cueing. Visual Cognition, 15(1), 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M. J., Poole, B. J., Tuholski, S. W., & Engle, R. W. (2006). Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of “executive attention”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(4), 749–777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karuza, E. A., Li, P., Weiss, D. J., Bulgarelli, F., Zinszer, B. D., & Aslin, R. N. (2016). Sampling over nonuniform distributions: A neural efficiency account of the primacy effect in statistical learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(10), 1484–1500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jiménez, L., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116(3), 321–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunar, M. A., Flusberg, S. J., & Wolfe, J. M. (2006). Contextual cuing by global features. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 68(7), 1204–1216.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, C. C. (2011). Integrating spatial context learning over contradictory signals: Recency effects in contextual cueing. Visual Cognition, 19(7), 846–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luria, R., & Vogel, E. K. (2011). Visual search demands dictate reliance on working memory storage. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(16), 6199–6207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luria, R., & Vogel, E. K. (2014). Come together, right now: Dynamic overwriting of an object’s history through common fate. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(8), 1819–1828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makovski, T., & Jiang, Y. V. (2010). Contextual cost: When a visual-search target is not where it should be. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(2), 216–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manginelli, A. A., Langer, N., Klose, D., & Pollmann, S. (2013). Contextual cueing under working memory load: Selective interference of visuospatial load with expression of learning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(6), 1103–1117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manginelli, A. A., & Pollmann, S. (2009). Misleading contextual cues: How do they affect visual search? Psychological Research, 73(2), 212–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mednick, S. C., Makovski, T., Cai, D. J., & Jiang, Y. V. (2009). Sleep and rest facilitate implicit memory in a visual search task. Vision Research, 49(21), 2557–2565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(4), 369–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perruchet, P., & Pacton, S. (2006). Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(5), 233–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926–1928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlagbauer, B., Rausch, M., Zehetleitner, M., Müller, H. J., & Geyer, T. (2018). Contextual cueing of visual search is associated with greater subjective experience of the search display configuration. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 4, 1. doi:10.1093/nc/niy001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, P., Hsu, T. Y., Tzeng, O. J., Hung, D. L., & Juan, C. H. (2011). Probabilities in implicit learning. Perception, 40(7), 822–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk-Browne, N. B. (2012). Statistical learning and its consequences. In The influence of attention, learning, and motivation on visual search (pp. 117–146). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Individual differences in working memory capacity and learning: Evidence from the serial reaction time task. Memory & Cognition, 33(2), 213–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadillo, M. A., Konstantinidis, E., & Shanks, D. R. (2016). Underpowered samples, false negatives, and unconscious learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 87–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaskevich, A., & Luria, R. (2018). Adding statistical regularity results in a global slowdown in visual search. Cognition, 174, 19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickery, T. J., Sussman, R. S., & Jiang, Y. V. (2010). Spatial context learning survives interference from working memory load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T. (2004). The psychology and neuroscience of forgetting. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 235–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search. Attention, 1, 13–73.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, R. Q., & Zhao, J. (2015). The persistence of the attentional bias to regularities in a changing environment. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(7), 2217–2228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zang, X., Zinchenko, A., Jia, L., Assumpção, L., & Li, H. (2018). Global repetition influences contextual cueing. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellin, M., Conci, M., von Mühlenen, A., & Müller, H. J. (2011). Two (or three) is one too many: Testing the flexibility of contextual cueing with multiple target locations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(7), 2065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellin, M., Conci, M., von Mühlenen, A., & Müller, H. J. (2013). Here today, gone tomorrow–adaptation to change in memory-guided visual search. PloS one, 8(3), e59466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellin, M., von Mühlenen, A., Müller, H. J., & Conci, M. (2014). Long-term adaptation to change in implicit contextual learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 1073–1079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., Ngo, N., McKendrick, R., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011). Mutual interference between statistical summary perception and statistical learning. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1212–1219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinchenko, A., Conci, M., Müller, H. J., & Geyer, T. (2018). Predictive visual search: Role of environmental regularities in the learning of context cues. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(5), 1096–1109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar