1,754
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Forthcoming Special Issue on: Visual Search and Selective Attention

Eye movements reveal learning and information-seeking in attentional template acquisition

, &
Pages 467-486 | Received 07 Dec 2018, Accepted 21 Jun 2019, Published online: 22 Jul 2019

References

  • van Asselen, M., Sampaio, J., Pina, A., & Castelo-Branco, M. (2011). Object based implicit contextual learning: A study of eye movements. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(2), 297–302. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0047-9
  • Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 437–443. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010
  • Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., & Pelz, J. B. (1995). Memory representations in natural tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(1), 66–80. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.1.66
  • Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., & Rao, R. P. N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(04), doi: 10.1017/S0140525X97001611
  • Berlyne, D. E. (1958). The influence of complexity and novelty in visual figures on orienting responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(3), 289–296. doi: 10.1037/h0043555
  • Bichot, N. P., & Schall, J. D. (1999). Effects of similarity and history on neural mechanisms of visual selection. Nature Neuroscience, 2(6), 549–554. doi: 10.1038/9205
  • Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97(4), 523–547.
  • Bundesen, C., Habekost, T., & Kyllingsbæk, S. (2005). A Neural theory of visual attention: Bridging cognition and Neurophysiology. Psychological Review, 112(2), 291–328. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.291
  • Carlisle, N. B., Arita, J. T., Pardo, D., & Woodman, G. F. (2011). Attentional Templates in visual working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(25), 9315–9322. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1097-11.2011
  • Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1(1), 42–45. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042
  • Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193–222. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
  • Droll, J. A., Gigone, K., & Hayhoe, M. M. (2007). Learning where to direct gaze during change detection. Journal of Vision, 7(14), 6–6. doi: 10.1167/7.14.6
  • Droll, J. A., & Hayhoe, M. M. (2005). Knowing when to remember and when to forget: Expected task relevance controls working memory use. Journal of Vision, 5(8), 618–618. doi: 10.1167/5.8.618
  • Droll, J. A., Hayhoe, M. M., Triesch, J., & Sullivan, B. T. (2005). Task Demands control acquisition and storage of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1416–1438. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1416
  • Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96(3), 433–458.
  • Foley, N. C., Kelly, S. P., Mhatre, H., Lopes, M., & Gottlieb, J. (2017). Parietal neurons encode expected gains in instrumental information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(16), E3315–E3323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613844114
  • Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1030–1044. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
  • Gayet, S., van Moorselaar, D., Olivers, C. N., Paffen, C. L., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2019). Prospectively reinstated memory drives conscious access of matching visual input. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 4793.
  • Gottlieb, J., Oudeyer, P.-Y., Lopes, M., & Baranes, A. (2013). Information seeking, curiosity and attention: Computational and neural mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(11), 585–593. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.001
  • Gunseli, E., Meeter, M., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2014). Is a search template an ordinary working memory? Comparing electrophysiological markers of working memory maintenance for visual search and recognition. Neuropsychologia, 60, 29–38. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.012
  • Gunseli, E., Olivers, C. N. L., & Meeter, M. (2014). Effects of search Difficulty on the selection, maintenance, and learning of attentional Templates. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(9), 2042–2054. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00600
  • Gunseli, E., Olivers, C. N. L., & Meeter, M. (2016). Task-irrelevant memories rapidly gain attentional control with learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(3), 354–362. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000134
  • Hayhoe, M. M., Droll, J., & Mennie, N. (2007). Learning where to look. In R. P. G. Van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements (pp. 641–646IX). Oxford: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-008044980-7/50032-X
  • Johansson, R., & Johansson, M. (2014). Look here, Eye movements play a Functional role in memory retrieval. Psychological Science, 25(1), 236–242. doi: 10.1177/0956797613498260
  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354.
  • Le Pelley, M. E., Pearson, D., Griffiths, O., & Beesley, T. (2015). When goals conflict with values: Counterproductive attentional and oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 158–171. doi: 10.1037/xge0000037
  • Luck, S. J., & Kappenman, E. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Opensesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
  • Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from Normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2), 61–64. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061
  • Navalpakkam, V., Koch, C., Rangel, A., & Perona, P. (2010). Understanding how reward and saliency affect overt attention and decisions. Journal of Vision, 10(7), 32–32. doi: 10.1167/10.7.32
  • Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertrial contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(3), 650–657. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.650
  • O’Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the ‘real’ mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 46(3), 461–488. doi: 10.1037/h0084327
  • Peck, C. J., Jangraw, D. C., Suzuki, M., Efem, R., & Gottlieb, J. (2009). Reward Modulates attention independently of Action value in Posterior Parietal Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(36), 11182–11191. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1929-09.2009
  • Peterson, M. S., Kramer, A. F., Wang, R. F., Irwin, D. E., & McCarley, J. S. (2001). Visual search has memory. Psychological Science, 12(4), 287–292. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00353
  • Rayner, K. (1978). Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 85(3), 618–660. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.85.3.618
  • Reinhart, R. M. G., & Woodman, G. F. (2014). High Stakes Trigger the Use of multiple memories to enhance the control of attention. Cerebral Cortex, 24(8), 2022–2035. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht057
  • Ryan, J. D., & Cohen, N. J. (2004). The nature of change Detection and Online representations of Scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(5), 988–1015.
  • Schneider, D., Bonmassar, C., & Hickey, C. (2018). Motivation and short-term memory in visual search: Attention’s accelerator revisited. Cortex, 102, 45–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.022
  • Stritzke, M., Trommershäuser, J., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2009). Effects of salience and reward information during saccadic decisions under risk. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 26(11), B1. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.26.0000B1
  • Tatler, B. W., Hayhoe, M. M., Land, M. F., & Ballard, D. H. (2011). Eye guidance in natural vision: Reinterpreting salience. Journal of Vision, 11(5), 5–5. doi: 10.1167/11.5.5
  • Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113(4), 766–786.
  • van Moorselaar, D., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2016). Learning changes the attentional status of prospective memories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1483–1490. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1008-7
  • Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428(6984), 748–751. doi: 10.1038/nature02447
  • Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature, 438(7067), 500–503. doi: 10.1038/nature04171
  • Voss, J. L., Schendan, H. E., & Paller, K. A. (2010). Finding meaning in novel geometric shapes influences electrophysiological correlates of repetition and dissociates perceptual and conceptual priming. NeuroImage, 49(3), 2879–2889. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.012
  • Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature Integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419.
  • Woodman, G. F., Carlisle, N. B., & Reinhart, R. M. G. (2013). Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention? Journal of Vision, 13(3), 1–1. doi: 10.1167/13.3.1